Guns, Guts and Goons
irish -liberty or death!
2012/07/31 00:56:04
Guns, Guts and Goons
Gun ownership in America is the primary reason why the internationalists fear the wrath of an armed citizenry.
The destruction of the Bill of Rights is a prime objective of the
beltway statists. Conversely, the elimination of the remnants of an
American federalist constitutional republic is the key eliminate
required for imposition of the global Illuminati matrix.
The primal reason to foster a society that bears weapons is to maintain the means to fight tyranny on your native soil.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/07/30/guns-guts-and-goons/
Top Opinion
-
Rusty Shackleford 2012/07/31 01:08:42






















timeline
2012 June 20, 2012
Uses position to withhold documents tied to gun smuggling probe
http://abcnews.go.com/Politic... tempt-vote/story?id=16610613#...
May 10, 2012
Threatens to veto DOJ bill because it blocks gun control law
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
April 22, 2012
Embraces executive orders to bypass Congress
http://www.infowars.com/we-ca...
February 21, 2012
At the U.N.: Pro-gun groups are stifled
http://www.heritage.org/resea...
February 17, 2012
Sneaks anti-gun measures into 2013 budget proposal
http://dailycaller.com/2012/0... ment-freedoms/
February 13, 2012
Cuts funds in half for armed pilot counter-terrorism program
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-...
2011 December 23, 2011
Says he won’t be bound by gun-control ban in omnibus
http://thehill.com/blogs/heal...
July 11, 2011
Authorizes administration’s first major gun regulation
http://www.rightsidenews.com/...
July 11, 2011
At the U.N.: Final Arms Trade Treaty talks under way
http://thenewamerican.com/usn...
July 7, 2011
Obama aide says gun legislation in "near future"
http://content.usatoday.com/c...
March 30, 2011
Says we’re working on gun control "under...
&&
&&
&&
&
&&
&
&
&
&
timeline
2012 June 20, 2012
Uses position to withhold documents tied to gun smuggling probe
http://abcnews.go.com/Politic... tempt-vote/story?id=16610613#...
May 10, 2012
Threatens to veto DOJ bill because it blocks gun control law
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
April 22, 2012
Embraces executive orders to bypass Congress
http://www.infowars.com/we-ca...
February 21, 2012
At the U.N.: Pro-gun groups are stifled
http://www.heritage.org/resea...
February 17, 2012
Sneaks anti-gun measures into 2013 budget proposal
http://dailycaller.com/2012/0... ment-freedoms/
February 13, 2012
Cuts funds in half for armed pilot counter-terrorism program
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-...
2011 December 23, 2011
Says he won’t be bound by gun-control ban in omnibus
http://thehill.com/blogs/heal...
July 11, 2011
Authorizes administration’s first major gun regulation
http://www.rightsidenews.com/...
July 11, 2011
At the U.N.: Final Arms Trade Treaty talks under way
http://thenewamerican.com/usn...
July 7, 2011
Obama aide says gun legislation in "near future"
http://content.usatoday.com/c...
March 30, 2011
Says we’re working on gun control "under the radar"
http://www.washingtonpost.com...
March 15, 2011
Looks for ways around Congress on gun policy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
March 13, 2011
Calls for gun reforms following Tucson tragedy
http://azstarnet.com/article_...
February 28, 2011
At the U.N.: Debate over scope of global gun restrictions
http://www.armscontrol.org/ac...
February 8, 2011
At the U.N.: Agreement signed with anti-gun group IANSA
http://en.iansa.org/node/1498
obama
timeline
2010 November 15, 2010
Nominates anti-gun Andrew Traver to head ATF
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/...
March 1, 2010
Busts plan to sell rifles to Americans
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
September 15, 2010
Appoints anti-gun Greg Nickels to U.N. post
http://www.uscca.us/ccr/view_...
July 12, 2010
At the U.N.: Arms Treaty to include all conventional weapons
http://www.heritage.org/resea...
May 10, 2010
Nominates anti-gun Elena Kagan for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
2009 October 14, 2009
Reverses stance on treaty to regulate arm trade
http://www.reuters.com/articl...
May 26, 2009
Nominates anti-gun Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court Justice
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire...
April 22, 2009
Nominates anti-gun Cass Sunstein for top regulatory post
http://www.opposingviews.com/...
April 16, 2009
Says "90% of guns recovered in Mexico come from U.S."
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
April 16, 2009
Assures he hasn’t "backed off at all" on pledge to restore gun ban
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-...
obama
timeline
2008 December 1, 2008
Nominates anti-gun Eric Holder for attorney general
http://www.examiner.com/conse...
December 1, 2008
Names anti-gun Hillary Clinton as secretary of state
http://www.issues2000.org/sen...
November 13, 2008
Weeds out gun owners from his White House staff
http://cnsnews.com/news/artic...
April 2, 2008
Says "I am not in favor of concealed weapons"
http://www.pittsburghlive.com...
February 16, 2008
Says right to bear arms "subject to common-sense regulation"
http://www.jsonline.com/news/...
February 15, 2008
Says microstamping is a "common-sense law"
http://www.buckeyestateblog.c...
January 15, 2008
Supports repealing the Tiarht Amendment
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2...
2007 April 22, 2007
Favors a ban on standard-capacity magazines
http://nraila.org/gun-laws/di...
2006 October 17, 2006
Says "I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities."
http://usliberals.about.com/o...
January 31, 2006
Votes against Samuel Alito for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
2005 September 22, 2005
Votes against John Roberts for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
obama
timeline
July 29, 2005
Votes against prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers
http://www.issues2000.org/201...
July 29, 2005
Votes to ban common rifle ammunition
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2...
2004 October 21, 2004
Says it’s "a scandal" Bush didn’t renew assault weapons ban
http://www.issues2000.org/200...
April 27, 2004
Says he continues to oppose concealed carry
http://articles.chicagotribun...
March 25, 2004
Votes against lowering FOID card age from 21 to 18
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati... 61&SessionID;=3&GA;=93
March 25, 2004
Votes to uphold local gun bans
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati... 61&SessionID;=3&GA;=93
March 25, 2004
Votes to uphold prosecution of people using guns in self-defense
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati... 61&SessionID;=3&GA;=93
2003 March 13, 2003
Votes to ban hundreds of common rifles & shotguns
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati... 4&SessionID;=3&GA;=93
obama
timeline
2001 July 5, 2001
Says he continues to favor handgun registration & licensing
http://www.guncite.com/gun_co...
February 20, 2001
Says "No reason why anybody should need an assault weapon"
http://www.guncite.com/gun_co...
2000
Co-sponsors bill to limit firearm purchases to one gun a month
http://civilliberty.about.com...
1999 December 13, 1999
Proposes banning gun stores within 5 mi. of schools & parks
http://michellemalkin.com/200...
December 13, 1999
Supports 500% tax increase on guns & ammo
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-f...
December 13, 1999
Supports ban on resale of police-issued firearms
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-f...
1998
Sits on Board of Directors for anti-gun Joyce Foundation
http://www.politico.com/news/...
July 2, 1998
Endorses a ban on sale or transfer of all semi-auto guns
http://www.issues2000.org/Bar...
1996 September 9, 1996
Supports ban on manufacture, sale & possession of handguns
http://www.thepoliticalguide....
obama
timeline
On Monday, July 30, U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and U.S. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced legislation that would impose sweeping new--and not so new--restrictions on ammunition sales.
The bills, S. 3458 and H.R. 6241, are known as the “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.” The bill itself has four elements:
•A federal licensing requirement for ammunition sellers;
•Recordkeeping on all ammunition sales;
•Reporting of all sales of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to anyone without a federal firearms license within five consecutive business days; and
•A photo identification requirement for all non-licensees buying ammunition, “effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians.”
The two lawmakers’ contempt for “regular civilians” is nothing new, and neither are the first two of the requirements they propose. Starting in 1968, ammunition dealers had to have licenses from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and also had to keep records of purchasers. The recordkeeping requirement on .22 caliber rimfire ammunition was so burdensome that it was repealed in 1982. Congress did away with the remaining licensing and recordkeeping provisions as part of the "Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986" after the BATF itself said t...
On Monday, July 30, U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and U.S. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced legislation that would impose sweeping new--and not so new--restrictions on ammunition sales.
The bills, S. 3458 and H.R. 6241, are known as the “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.” The bill itself has four elements:
•A federal licensing requirement for ammunition sellers;
•Recordkeeping on all ammunition sales;
•Reporting of all sales of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to anyone without a federal firearms license within five consecutive business days; and
•A photo identification requirement for all non-licensees buying ammunition, “effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians.”
The two lawmakers’ contempt for “regular civilians” is nothing new, and neither are the first two of the requirements they propose. Starting in 1968, ammunition dealers had to have licenses from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and also had to keep records of purchasers. The recordkeeping requirement on .22 caliber rimfire ammunition was so burdensome that it was repealed in 1982. Congress did away with the remaining licensing and recordkeeping provisions as part of the "Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986" after the BATF itself said the restrictions had “no substantial law enforcement value.”
The proposed bill would turn back the clock to the days when ammunition was only available in person at licensed stores, driving up prices and making less popular cartridges nearly unobtainable for millions of lawful gun owners. The effect of all of these proposals on competitive shooters, who buy ammunition by the case lot for consistent accuracy and shoot tens of thousands of rounds each year in practice, would be especially devastating. And because the word “ammunition” is defined in federal law to include components such as bullets and empty cartridge cases, the bill would be disastrous for handloaders--especially those who enjoy shooting rare, historic cartridges.
In fact, Lautenberg and McCarthy would do well to heed the words of the Obama administration’s top negotiator at the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty conference, who pointed out to the nations of the world that “Ammunition is … fungible, consumable, reloadable, and cannot be marked in any practical way that would permit it to be tracked or traced. Any practical proposal for ammunition would need to consider the significant burdens associated with licensing, authorizations, and recordkeeping for ammunition that is produced and transferred in the billions of rounds per year.”
Please contact your U.S. Senators and your U.S. Representative and urge them to oppose S. 3458 and H.R. 6241 respectively. You can find contact information for your elected officials by using the "Write Your Representatives" tool at www.NRAILA.org., or you can call your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121 and your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121. Once you have taken this action, please be sure to forward this information to your family, friends, and fellow firearm owners, and strongly encourage them to contact their lawmakers as well.
The bills, S. 3458 and H.R. 6241, are known as the “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.” The bill itself has four elements:
•A federal licensing requirement for ammunition sellers;
•Recordkeeping on all ammunition sales;
•Reporting of all sales of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to anyone without a federal firearms license within five consecutive business days; and
•A photo identification requirement for all non-licensees buying ammunition, “effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians.”
The two lawmakers’ contempt for “regular civilians” is nothing new, and neither are the first two of the requirements they propose. Starting in 1968, ammunition dealers had to have licenses from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and also had to keep records of purchasers. The recordkeeping requirement on .22 caliber rimfire ammunition was so burdensome that it was repealed in 1982. Congress did away with the remaining licensing and recordkeeping provisions as part of the "Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986" after the BATF itself said the re...
The bills, S. 3458 and H.R. 6241, are known as the “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.” The bill itself has four elements:
•A federal licensing requirement for ammunition sellers;
•Recordkeeping on all ammunition sales;
•Reporting of all sales of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to anyone without a federal firearms license within five consecutive business days; and
•A photo identification requirement for all non-licensees buying ammunition, “effectively banning the online or mail order purchase of ammo by regular civilians.”
The two lawmakers’ contempt for “regular civilians” is nothing new, and neither are the first two of the requirements they propose. Starting in 1968, ammunition dealers had to have licenses from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and also had to keep records of purchasers. The recordkeeping requirement on .22 caliber rimfire ammunition was so burdensome that it was repealed in 1982. Congress did away with the remaining licensing and recordkeeping provisions as part of the "Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986" after the BATF itself said the restrictions had “no substantial law enforcement value.”
The proposed bill would turn back the clock to the days when ammunition was only available in person at licensed stores, driving up prices and making less popular cartridges nearly unobtainable for millions of lawful gun owners. The effect of all of these proposals on competitive shooters, who buy ammunition by the case lot for consistent accuracy and shoot tens of thousands of rounds each year in practice, would be especially devastating. And because the word “ammunition” is defined in federal law to include components such as bullets and empty cartridge cases, the bill would be disastrous for handloaders--especially those who enjoy shooting rare, historic cartridges.
In fact, Lautenberg and McCarthy would do well to heed the words of the Obama administration’s top negotiator at the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty conference, who pointed out to the nations of the world that “Ammunition is … fungible, consumable, reloadable, and cannot be marked in any practical way that would permit it to be tracked or traced. Any practical proposal for ammunition would need to consider the significant burdens associated with licensing, authorizations, and recordkeeping for ammunition that is produced and transferred in the billions of rounds per year.”
Please contact your U.S. Senators and your U.S. Representative and urge them to oppose S. 3458 and H.R. 6241 respectively. You can find contact information for your elected officials by using the "Write Your Representatives" tool at www.NRAILA.org., or you can call your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121 and your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121. Once you have taken this action, please be sure to forward this information to your family, friends, and fellow firearm owners, and strongly encourage them to contact their lawmakers as well.