Gun Control
Tennessean
2012/06/25 23:25:43
|
|
|||||
|
3 votes
|
|
25% | |||
|
9 votes
|
|
75% | |||
You're
sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.
Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with
fear, you hear
muffled whispers.
At
least two people have broken into your house and are moving your
way.
With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up
your shotgun.
You rack a shell
into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.
In the darkness, you make out two
shadows.
One holds something
that looks like a crowbar.
When
the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire.
The blast knocks both thugs to the
floor.
One writhes and screams
while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.
As you pick up the telephone to call
police, you know you're in trouble.
In your country, most guns were
outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently
regulated as to make them useless..
Yours was never registered.
Police arrive and inform you that
the second burglar has died.
They arrest you for First Degree
Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm.
When you talk to your attorney, he
tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to
manslaughter.
"What kind of
sentence will I get?" you ask.
"Only ten-to-twelve years," he
replies, as if that's nothing.
"Behave yourself, and you'll
be out in seven."
The next day,
the shooting is the lead story in the local
newspaper. Somehow,
you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are
represented as choirboys.
Their
friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them..
Buried deep down in the article,
authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous
times.
But the next day's headline says it all:
"Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to
Die."
The thieves have been
transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters..
As the days wear on, the story takes
wings.
The national
media picks it up, then the international
media.
The surviving burglar has become a
folk hero.
Your attorney says
the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.
The media publishes reports that your home has been
burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local
police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.
After the last break-in, you told
your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.
The District Attorney uses this to
allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars..
A few months later, you go to
trial.
The charges haven't been
reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.
When you take the stand, your anger
at the injustice of it all works against you..
Prosecutors paint a picture of you
as a mean, vengeful man.
It
doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.
The judge sentences you to life in
prison.
This case really
happened.
On August 22, 1999,
Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a
second.
In April, 2000, he was
convicted and is now serving a life term...
How did it become a crime to defend
one's own life in the once great British Empire ?
It started
with the Pistols Act of 1903.
This
seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and
established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a
license.
The Firearms
Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only
handguns but all firearms except shotguns..
Later laws
passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by
private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.
Momentum for total handgun
confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987.
Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed
man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he
saw.
When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.
The British
public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even
tougher restrictions.
(The seizure of
all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)
Nine
years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic
weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.
For many
years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse,
criminals.
Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up
law-abiding gun owners.
Day after
day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and
demanded a total ban on all handguns.
The
Dunblane Inquiry, a few
months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private
citizens.
During the
years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights,
the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as
vigilantism.
Authorities refused to
grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was
no longer considered a reason to own a gun.
Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or
rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.
Indeed,
after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying,
"We cannot have people take the law into
their own hands."
All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous
times,
and several elderly people
were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the
consequences.
Martin himself, a
collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by
burglars.
When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns
were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.
Being
good British subjects, most people obeyed the law.
The few who didn't were visited by
police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't
comply.
Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns
from private citizens.
How did the authorities know who had
handguns?
The guns had been registered and licensed.
Kind of like cars.
Sound familiar?
WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.
"...It does not require a
majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush
fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams
Top Opinion
-
Cuppajo 2012/06/25 23:31:52Unreasonable


















Drug addict is using strong painkillers and overdoses. Said junky had a private supplier, instead of buying from just any lowlife on the street. As soon as the media gets word of the OD they immediately go into a frenzy portraying the junkie to be an unfortunate victim if some vile monster. Public devours and fuels the media circus, just to add to this farce the authorities join in the circus and the supplier, who dealt to no other addicts, wasn't selling in front of schools, or anything of the sort. Is arrested, but would the circus allow him to be charged only with the crime he committed? Hell no, who wants to see someone tried for distributing a controlled substance? So this person, who would only have made strike one is hauled into the center ring on charges on killing the junkie, and of course, after the media played their part this man was sent off to prison same as if he would have shot the junkie. And the audience cheered and carried on about how evil that person was for dealing drugs to an addict who wanted them from where ever he could get them.
It is a sad time we are living in, and not a day goes by that something doesn't lower my opinion of it.