Got Guns?

When the hell will this country have a politician with the testicular fortitude to tell the UN to pack their sh!t and get the hell out of our country? It staggers the imagination that we supply those America hating, sissified, socialist, a-holes with piles of our tax money so they can sit around on their asses in their posh hotels (that we pay for) thinking of ways to undermine this country.

You need to send that very message to your Senators.

Obamass and HiLiary have been trying to get rid of our guns. They'd prefer Americans to be unarmed. They're easier to control without a weapon in hand. The NRA has been fighting for our rights, so the two cowards sneak behind our backs and look to the UN to take away our weapons. The vote is July 27th I believe. The Hag and Thief are trying.

I would have voted for Charlton Heston and his "cold dead fingers" quote if I had seen the whole thing. Correct me if I'm wrong "Praise the Lord and Pass the ammunition" was a popular WWII saying.
Call your senators and complain about the UN Gun Treaty.

I already have and he replied that he was aganist the treaty if it in anyway impedes the 2nd ammendment rights marco rubio of fla. It takes 60 vote in senate to ratify a treaty. All 47 repulbican senators oppose this treaty. As of right now they don't have the votes. The big problem is that the treaty well go before the senate during the laim duck session.

Even if the Senate doesn't go along w/ Obie on this he'll push it thru by executive order like he does everything else.

Well he can't approve a treaty by executive order. Only congress can do that. If he did that would definitely grounds for impeachment which i think the congress would definitely take action and put him down and that includes the demoasses. Like you said i wouldn't put it pass him to try it.

The filthy bastard gun grabbing obama can KISS my F&%#ing ass.

With over 100 million gun owners in America, and people purchasing 5 million guns a month. I really feel sorry for the police and military if they attempt to enforce the UN's Gun Treaty in Texas and most of the South, and South West. They'll be facing conservatively 2 million gun owning American resistors. That could be as high as 10 million, depending on the percentage of American who don't go a long to get a long. That's a number that no military in the world can defeat. I'm sorry to hear that it's coming down to all of this.

There should be more than that since there is close to 100 million gun owners in America.

Hopefully you're right. But I'm going really conservative (worse case scenerio) here,in the event that the government and media bamboozle Americans that it's in their overall best interest to turn in their new UN banned weapons, and everthing is going to be alright.

Even if a large percentage follow that BS, and if only 2-10 percent resist? Then we're still talking 2 to 10 million gun owners. But you're right, it could be as high as let's say 50 to 70 million who won't comply with the UN Treaty. Hopefully, you're right, then the Treay would be impossible to enforce.

I was once ask what would I do if they came for my weapons I told them that they could have them one piece at a time starting with the hollow points


Just a few of my weapons







My Henry chamber for 357



Also













Semper Fi

and I am Damm Good with all of them

Wow, Freud would have a field day with you :-)

They could try.

Semper Fi

Well I see that Bush had it right with the nasty UN....He paid NO attention to them.....when they said not to invade he told them to shove off.....

The NWO is after our guns.....and if Fast and furious did not get it done then they will find another way.. Because until our guns are gone we are a free people.....!!!!!! believe it.

And WHEN our guns are gone, we are no longer free.

yep....exactly..... do you know who holds the largest army in the world?

The American people ....100 million owned guns in this country....

don't mess with my gun....

I'm good!

HAHAHAHAHAHA

They will have to kill me to take my guns.

True - I am really conservative and could care less if they take my money (taxes) etc... BUT - if they try to take my guns that is where I will draw the line. I won't say how I will do it because I am becoming paranoid with all the GOV monitoring, including the new Drones over the USA that are supposedly to monitor the "bad guys" - the problem is Homeland Security sees us as the bad guys. Sad thing is I am a military officer, but this is one order I cannot obey

It will be a sad day when they come for my guns because someone will die.

I dread the thought of having to shoot someone (as well as dying of course), but there are things in life that are more valuable than life. Liberty being one of them. I will use deadly force to protect my freedom as well as the freedom of my fellow citizens.

Pass the end of the barrel while pulling the trigger.

Not on my watch!!!

SOMEONE MIGHT TAKE A LOOK AND SEE WHAT THEY ARE UP AGAINST...ALL MY LAW ENFORCEMENT FRIENDS SAY THEY WOULD NEVER SUPPORT THIS...

Never will I give up my guns willingly.

I always say if they come for my guns, they'd better bring guns.

That too.

I will never give them up unwillingly

There's still time, go buy a Remington Home Defense Shotgun, you don't need a permit to own one.

I may or may not, why you askin'? Break into my house and take a chance!

No thanks I'll pass. You gotz yours and I gotz mine... as it should be.

Fair enough.

You raised a question I just had to have an answer to. In my mind, I knew the answer, but as is my policy, trust but verify. Here's what I found.
Can a treaty override an individual right protected under the Constitution? In its 1957 decision in Reid v. Covert, the Supreme Court held that the "obvious and decisive answer to this, of course, is that no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." (1) There is perhaps no element of the foreign relations law canon more universally held than the proposition that constitutional rights prevail as against inconsistent international agreements; a consensus of commentators, (2) courts, (3) and other constitutional actors (4) has long held that, in this respect, the Constitution stands supreme. Even as other elements of modern foreign relations law have come under vigorous assault. (5) this constraint on the treaty power has gone unchallenged. Indeed, across the political spectrum, the rule is counted among those whose deep entrenchment eliminates the need for justification--so much so that it has attracted almost no scholarly attention in recent decades.

Excellent. I hope the paranoiacs read and digest your response. Geez!

Oh I am not saying the threat isn't real. The Globalists know they have to destroy the American people and the Constitution which we live under. As we have witnessed under the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, he has no problems stretching, violating or misinterpreting the Constitution for he and his minions agenda. I am just informing those who may not have the legal position so that when our Constitutional "Professor"-in-Chief attempts to once again circumvent it for his agenda we will have some facts.

*sigh*

LOL, disappointed? Living in reality can be disappointing.