Quantcast

Google Unveils Project Glass: Superb or Scary?

SodaHead News 2012/04/04 23:33:37
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Law enforcement is already having a tough time keeping people from texting while driving, and if Google's new Project Glass takes off it's going to get a lot tougher. Imagine all the functionality of a smartphone (Google Maps, daily memos, text messages from friends and family) and transfer it to a device that's pretty much a futuristic-looking pair of eyeglasses. As in: you can see all the information that pours into your smartphone in front of your very eyes... without even glancing at your cell.

Project Glass isn't even close to being complete and Google says it's only sharing the idea with the public to get some feedback on the technology. Watch the video for more insight and let us know what you think of the development of "Project Glass." We're a little frightened with the futuristic-ness of it all... but hey, we may be alone.

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • prosperhappily 2012/04/05 15:39:12 (edited)
    Scary
    prosperhappily
    +10
    If they can find a way to keep people from using it while driving or walking near the street I'd be fine with it. In fact, I'd think it's damn cool.

    Thing is there are a lot of stupid, irresponsible people out there. They will not stop to think about the danger they're putting themselves and others in. Just encountered that on Monday when my car was hit by an uninsured motorist.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Cimz Alexandria 2012/04/05 08:10:29
    Cimz
    lol i only raved cause I loved the cat's expression! lol
  • BigKwell 2012/04/05 03:32:22
    Scary
    BigKwell
    +2
    Bad enough we have to worry about distracted drivers, we don't need them ignoring what's ahead of them.
  • @TheMis... BigKwell 2012/04/05 04:50:07
    @TheMissesHelp <-Follow/Tweet me
    +1
    I want to know when the parade of "let's try this out and accidently walk into random objects" starts.
  • 13_Junk... BigKwell 2012/04/05 05:48:53 (edited)
    13_JunkyardDog
    drivers who crash wearing these can be a perfect example of Darwinism. If your stupid enough to distract yourself in such a way while driving, perhaps you deserved it
  • katywon 2012/04/05 03:30:40
    Scary
    katywon
    +1
    It will be amazing but when anyone is driving a car or truck on these busy roads it will be just another distraction. Doesn't anyone just like to drive and listen to music and relax. Unless its an emergency it seems only to be really useful if you are stuck in traffic or you need help in someway. Is everyone so lonely these days that they have to be in constant communication with someone? texting car accident
  • De-Dee 2012/04/05 03:29:03
    Superb
    De-Dee
  • Anthony Souls 2012/04/05 03:27:15
    Scary
    Anthony Souls
    +1
    Not scary, just not practical. How will you control the device? Hand motions? Voice operated? Remote controlled? And what health concerns will happen from the side effects? Reminds me of The Jerk movie all over again: where Steve Martin invents eyeglasses that turns everyone cross-eyed. Scientists don't ask all the fundamental questions, anymore.

    Take care,
  • Crypt_H... Anthony... 2012/04/05 03:33:48
    Crypt_Heart
    +2
    Probably 'eye control'. It's already being released in Japan where the hardware tracks your eye movements to flick through the photo's being displayed or zoom in. Apparently a bit confusing to get used to at first but there were a lot of positive reviews for the control.

    I would expect text input to be voice controlled.

    Side effects...people already wear glasses and VDU's (Visual Display Units) the health effects for both of these items are well documented. The only difference is that this becomes an Interactive VDU instead of just being a "tv in glasses" effect.
  • Anthony... Crypt_H... 2012/04/05 03:47:25
    Anthony Souls
    Should of considered that it could be eye controlled, sigh. However, the side effects of watching a T.V. from afar would be a lot of different than a display inches from your eyes. Also, eyes were never meant to be used in such a fashion, our use of computers is highly repetitious: this will no doubt take more of a toll on our eyes than ever expected. Furthermore, wearing eye glasses to correct your vision is a lot different than wearing eye glasses to control a display...

    On the top of my head, I would list these side effects of such a device:
    1. Severe eye strain.
    2. Possible damage from direct light emission that would be necessary to produce a crystal clear image from inches away.
    3. Involuntary eye movements as a result of repetitious actions to click, zoom, view, and etc...
    4. Possible illusory side effects from distorting vision from such a close proximity: like how your eyes adjusts to new eye glasses over a prolonged period of time.
    5. etc...

    Take care,
  • Crypt_H... Anthony... 2012/04/05 03:58:13
    Crypt_Heart
    +1
    We already know the medical side effects because we already have products on the market... approved by the US the EU and China. Although they aren't heads up display they are effectively the positioning of two tv's directly in front of your eyes. (I have a pair, I love em XD)

    Do you get involuntary finger movements from over use of the computer? (I know I don't and I spend the majority of my time on the computer. )
  • Anthony... Crypt_H... 2012/04/05 04:47:27
    Anthony Souls
    Eye movements are more prone to involuntary problems, if you ask me: damaging the eye muscle will cause spasms and so fourth; also, constant focusing is going to cause eye distortion: simply because constantly wearing prescription lenses changes in vision. Therefore, long term use of eye controlled devices will end up with some obvious, but unforeseen by some, side effects :P Don't say I didn't warn you :P The idea is just waiting for effects to happen :P If we already had high definition lenses that your eye movements can control, Google wouldn't be creating such a project: therefore, the side effects can't be conflated like that.


    Take care,
  • Crypt_H... Anthony... 2012/04/05 06:49:51 (edited)
    Crypt_Heart
    We don't have lenses but we do have screen.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?... < eye control
    http://gadgets.softpedia.com/... < Visual Display Unit (Myvu)

    What google is doing is expanding on the idea. It has the money to waste after all.

    Edit.

    Long term usage of prescription glasses do not change the eye lenses unless you have a short term problem. Once you are short sighted it stays that way and gets gradually worse. There's no way to stop, prevent or reverse, except by chopping the lens to pieces (eye surgery). Source: Every optician I've asked so far (Three). Why: Slightly short sighted T_T
  • Alex, WolmanXX 2012/04/05 03:24:40
    Superb
    Alex, WolmanXX
    This isn't bad, but definatly a lot of "if"s.
  • mihai71 2012/04/05 03:13:40
    Scary
    mihai71
    +1
    If you look back in the history every age of accelerated advance was followed by a dark period of time. I won't be around in 50-100 yrs for sure (40+ now). My question is how can we be sure the high tech will take us up?
  • Anthony... mihai71 2012/04/05 03:23:18
    Anthony Souls
    My thoughts exactly, with every changing of the generational guards, our society gets thrown through chaos, and history shows that every century or so, drastic wars happen to resolve this pattern.

    Take care,
  • Steelshrt 2012/04/05 03:12:06
    Superb
    Steelshrt
    Not sure I would wear it all day though. Having all that stuff obstruct my view would be a hasle.
  • Lexi 2012/04/05 03:06:17
    Superb
    Lexi
  • baby shaker 2012/04/05 03:03:56
    Superb
    baby shaker
    +2
    Insurance is gonna go through the roof
  • Angecael 2012/04/05 02:55:33
    Superb
    Angecael
    +1
    When I was young and pictured futuristic objects I always imagined that.. I like it.
  • alanh 2012/04/05 02:52:44
    Superb
    alanh
    +1
    Its a little of both scary and superb. If it is used while driving than it scares the sh@t out of me!!!! Don't we have enough lousy drivers out there already!!!
  • zcberry 2012/04/05 02:47:13
    Superb
    zcberry
  • UndeadZander 2012/04/05 02:40:31
    Superb
    UndeadZander
    +1
    Oh
    My
    God
    I
    Want
    <3
  • Royo 2012/04/05 02:38:33
    Superb
    Royo
    +2
    OMG I WANT THAT SOOOOO BAD!!!
  • MLor 2012/04/05 02:34:58 (edited)
    Scary
    MLor
    +1
    Might be a problem with impersonating robots! Enough is enough. Shepard on FOX said it best, "strap an i-fone to yur face". This is going too far.
    Wonder how many assults on the streets will happen when the "have-nots" think they're entitled to these for free?
  • Crypt_H... MLor 2012/04/05 03:35:16
    Crypt_Heart
    On your last point, they could be disguised as normal glasses or sun glasses quite easily.
  • Pooua 2012/04/05 02:34:21
    Scary
    Pooua
    +2
    Although I have envisioned something like this for 3 decades (when I was in middle school science class in 1979/80), this demo felt awkward. I'm skeptical of how easy it would be to interface with this device. I don't believe it will be that easy to command the system to do as desired, and while trying to get it to work correctly, someone is likely to walk right out in front of a car. Even in the demo, the constantly changing display came at me too fast for me to catch it all, and I can see a lot of pitfalls, such as someone hacking your camera and spying on your meetings. I'm also disappointed that the Glass did not ID the dogs, buy the tickets right then and there (what's this "remind me to buy tonight" stuff?) or figure out on its own how to pronounce that entertainer's name (because, I guarantee I wouldn't have). All told, real life with any device like this is going to take a lot of adjustment and training from all parties involved to get it to work correctly.
  • Crypt_H... Pooua 2012/04/05 03:36:33
    Crypt_Heart
    You're not supposed to use them in the car...that's going to be quickly illegal. It'll be just as distracting as a mobile phone. That said it will be harder to track.
  • Brehtttt 2012/04/05 02:24:37
    Scary
    Brehtttt
    +2
    I don't think the tech is the problem, it's the people who show poor judgment in using it and not knowing the actual limits of their capability behind the wheel.
  • Pooua Brehtttt 2012/04/05 02:44:35
    Pooua
    Naw, the tech is also a problem. Did you notice that Google (understandably) foresees using Glass with its own, generally rejected social media applications? These are not necessarily good fits with this system. I'm not such a fan of Google's vision for the display, either.
  • Crypt_H... Pooua 2012/04/05 03:37:19
    Crypt_Heart
    Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
  • suomynonA 2012/04/05 02:19:36
    Superb
    suomynonA
    I cant wait for this.
  • BwaHa 2012/04/05 02:15:01
    Superb
    BwaHa
    I love new hi-tech stuff!
  • Broken 2012/04/05 02:13:53
    Superb
    Broken
    +4
    As a military guy, it looks like a modification of the Heads Up Displays we give our pilots so they can fly and engage targets better and safer. I think this will be a great technology. All the worry warts who want to outlaw cell phones in cars, etc. are swimming against the tide of technology that people want and will use regardless of whatever draconian laws they create to force us to do otherwise. They are dinosaurs.
  • Pooua Broken 2012/04/05 02:24:16 (edited)
    Pooua
    I guess you missed the poll a few weeks ago about legalizing cell phone jammers...

    Out of curiosity, do you know if pilots use their heads-up display to watch the status of everything around them while they attempt to land aircraft? I'm thinking they don't. I'm thinking the HUD is mostly used when the pilots don't have to pay a lot of attention to what is a half-second in front of their aircraft.
  • Broken Pooua 2012/04/05 03:07:35
    Broken
    Not being a pilot myself, but being in an aviation unit, I will ask one of my pilot buddies.
  • Crypt_H... Broken 2012/04/05 03:38:23
    Crypt_Heart
    That's effectively it yet =D Except your HUD's have headtracking *drool*
  • jonahpraveen 2012/04/05 02:04:16
    Superb
    jonahpraveen
    +1
    Each Human decides how a human should be so not a problem. He chooses humans not humanoids i guess...........
  • Mr.Hoodz the Truth Troll 2012/04/05 02:02:52
    Scary
    Mr.Hoodz the Truth Troll
    +5
    Putting the people deeper and deeper into the matrix.

    "I sort of gave up on this whole human adventure a long time ago, divorced myself from it emotionally. It gives me an artistic detachment that I find valuable. I think the human race has squandered its gift, and I think this country has squandered its promise, for the sake of cell phones and Jet Skis."

    George Carlin.
  • Drachen 2012/04/05 02:01:00
  • Couri 2012/04/05 02:00:16
    Superb
    Couri
    +2
    I think it's a great concept. There's just the problem of how to make it more practical. It would get annoying seeing all those blinking lights right in front of your eyes after a while.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 12:21:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals