

|
|
|||||
|
16 votes
|
|
27% | |||
|
36 votes
|
|
60% | |||
|
8 votes
|
|
13% | |||
The Apartheid entity called Israel is based on terrorism and ethnic cleansing right from the beginning.
From what I can ascertain they aren't permanent residents and have homes elsewhere.
Its an area in Hevron/Hebron, I hope these archaeologists can find the Jewish shepherd that tended to their flock thousands of years ago and continued to well before the Arabs.
Some of these caves/homes were not legally theirs.
It may seem sad but states not only Israel have had to move people from homes for a variety of reasons.
They have homes in other areas to go to according to the information.
I'm going by information on an extreme left-wing anti-Israel newspaper.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/d...
Most Jews will never chose Jesus its antithetical to Judaism. "This is the Zionist agreed 1948 UN deal that created the state of Israel for all Jews." - can you be more specific?
"it clearly states that the City of Jerusalem does not belong to the Jews from 1948 to infinity" - again, be more specific what and where clearly states which thing. I need something to work off here.
I don't like religion. I don't care about Christianity as long as it doesn't impose itself on me. I mentioned it to destroy a point you made. " Maybe he wants to remove the Christians out of Jerusalem too!" - ie: if he wanted to (not that he can) he's doing it the wrong way.
You can ignore what the jews did to Jesus Christ all you like, but it is the only reason many Christians dislike jews. Only the nazis were anti-semitic, and those thugs were never Christians.
Leaving aside my atheism, that I don't believe Jesus existed and I accept that * supposedly* some Jews over 2,000 years ago had a role in the death of Jesus:
1. It as the Romans that killed him.
2. The Christian religion wouldn't exist as it is since Jesus is supposed to return to earth and "save" humanity (or something like that).
3. Without his death along with all the irrational illogical reasons and implications regarding taking the burden of sin etc the logic follows that mankind wouldn't be "saved/redeemed."
4. One would think:
A). Thank the Jewish people/the Romans modern day Italians.
B). Practice their faith/think critically and rationally about it and drop a 2,000 "dislike" Jews of today have nothing to do with the actions of some Jews over 2000 years ago.
I'm glad the majority of Jews don't dislike Christians due to their 2,000 years of persecution and massacres of Jews: Crusades, Martin Luthor, inquisitions, progroms, holocaust, blood libels, converting Jews delegitmization of Israel, ...
Leaving aside my atheism, that I don't believe Jesus existed and I accept that * supposedly* some Jews over 2,000 years ago had a role in the death of Jesus:
1. It as the Romans that killed him.
2. The Christian religion wouldn't exist as it is since Jesus is supposed to return to earth and "save" humanity (or something like that).
3. Without his death along with all the irrational illogical reasons and implications regarding taking the burden of sin etc the logic follows that mankind wouldn't be "saved/redeemed."
4. One would think:
A). Thank the Jewish people/the Romans modern day Italians.
B). Practice their faith/think critically and rationally about it and drop a 2,000 "dislike" Jews of today have nothing to do with the actions of some Jews over 2000 years ago.
I'm glad the majority of Jews don't dislike Christians due to their 2,000 years of persecution and massacres of Jews: Crusades, Martin Luthor, inquisitions, progroms, holocaust, blood libels, converting Jews delegitmization of Israel, starting wars in the region, arming the enemies of Israel too the teeth etc, the list is endless,
There was only one Nazi that was a Catholic to be excommunicated and that was because he married a protestant. I don't accept this nonsense that Nazis weren't Christians. Hitler was a Christian. Obviously Christians dismiss any Christian nutcase as not "real Christians" as if they know who and what a "real Christian is" is similar to what Muslims say about Islamic extremists. Lets be clear Christians cant' even agree amongst themselves there are over 30,000 different denominations of Christianity alone all claiming to hold the objective truth.
http://www.knesset.gov.il/hol...
"On November 29, 1947, the UN General Assembly voted in favor of a resolution, which adopted the plan for the partition of Palestine, recommended by the majority of the UN Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP). 33 states voted in favor of the resolution and 13 against. 10 states abstained. UNSCOP was appointed seven months earlier, after Great Britain, which ruled the country on the basis of a League of Nations Mandate, decided that in light of the growing Jewish resistance and violent opposition to its rule, it was unwilling to continue on the existing basis, and handed the whole issue over to the UN. The UN Committee reached the conclusion that the Mandate for Palestine should be terminated, and most of its members recommended the establishment in the territory of Mandatory Palestine of an Arab state and a Jewish state, while internationalizing Jerusalem.
The partition map proposed by UNSCOP allotted the Jewish state only a small part of Western Palestine. Despite this fact, the Zionist Organization and the institutions of the Jewish community in Eretz Yisrael agreed to accept the plan, since it recognized the right of the Jewish people to a state and not only a "national home" as stated in the 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 Mandate for Palestine.
The adoption of the partition resolution by the General Assembly was received by the Jewish community with great joy and thousands went out to the streets to celebrate, even though it was clear that the Arab states and the Palestinian Arabs would embark on a relentless war against the realization of the plan to establish a Jewish state."
http://www.knesset.gov.il/pro...
I've looked for you link and narrowed the search I can't find anything it would help if you posted the link:
http://www.loc.gov/search/?q=...
I'll answer that: They do not now nor have they ever intended to see it become a reality.
The United States did something similar with the American Native Peoples. US forces and civilians carried out more than a century of manipulation and heavily one sided and brutal military campaings against the native tribes. Who were simply fighting to preserve their way of life and protect themselves, their families and their homelands against an aggressor who viewed them as less than human and which believed it's actions to be ordained by their god. After decimating the native population they confined the majority of them to the Indian Territory (Oklahoma). Except of course for those few tribes who lived in areas that nobody else wanted anyway. Like the desert dwelling Navaho and Pueblo. Then after all of the former native lands had been parceled out to the interlopers. They turned their attention to the Indian Territory. They crammed the remaining native peoples into even smaller allocations within the territories. (The least favorable areas that is.) Then they set about parceling out t...
I'll answer that: They do not now nor have they ever intended to see it become a reality.
The United States did something similar with the American Native Peoples. US forces and civilians carried out more than a century of manipulation and heavily one sided and brutal military campaings against the native tribes. Who were simply fighting to preserve their way of life and protect themselves, their families and their homelands against an aggressor who viewed them as less than human and which believed it's actions to be ordained by their god. After decimating the native population they confined the majority of them to the Indian Territory (Oklahoma). Except of course for those few tribes who lived in areas that nobody else wanted anyway. Like the desert dwelling Navaho and Pueblo. Then after all of the former native lands had been parceled out to the interlopers. They turned their attention to the Indian Territory. They crammed the remaining native peoples into even smaller allocations within the territories. (The least favorable areas that is.) Then they set about parceling out that land as well.
It should be nothed that at each step the US government and it's agents swore on a stack of bibles that they would never require the native peoples to give up more than the terms of this last treaty required. They broke that oath at every turn, every time. Even now the US government is steadily and quietly carrying out this policy.
Of course it's not a new story. It's happened every time anyone has ever expanded into new real estate.