
Good Guns Can Kill Bad People
☆astac☆
2012/12/15 17:52:01
The progressives hadn't let the blood dry on the classroom floor in Newton, CT before they were using the deaths of all those children to leverage their cause of gun control. Had conservative broadcasters attempted to exploit such human suffering, they'd be roundly denounced as soulless ghouls and rightly so. When I first read online of the killings, I just shook my head in sadness then immediately steeled myself for what I knew was coming from the hysterical lefties. They did not disappoint although, I must confess to a certain despair that Mayor Bloomberg has become such a predictable old scold. Can we not somehow sue this turkey for calling himself a Republican?
Another horrific mass murder and if we could not predict its timing we could predict its site within certain parameters. With predictable regularity, the most lethal of these types of attacks take place in public venues such as shopping malls, restaurants, theaters, with the deadliest frequently being institutions of learning. We are all familiar with the Columbine High School killings in which 12 students and a single teacher died or the Virginia Tech massacre where 32 people died. Fewer remember the 2006 killing of five Amish schoolgirls by a milk truck driver or the Jonesboro, AR school shooting in which five died, gunned down by fellow students. How many remember the memorable name of Kip Kinkel, an Oregon high school student who murdered his parents and two students in 1998? Or what about that Red Lake, MN mass killing where nine died in 2005? Of course everyone remembers the Aurora, CO theater shooting, but what about the 2007 Arvada, CO school shooting that left five dead?
The point I'm attempting to make here is that these tragedies recur with an irregular chronological predictability, but with a largely predictable targeted area, school campuses, be they elementary as with this latest tragedy, or high school as at Columbine, or university as with Virginia Tech. Other than their educational bond, they all share another commonality, the one which most likely leads to their selection by the perpetrators as the scenes for their slaughters: they are all sites where the presence of firearms is strictly prohibited and enforced with zero tolerance. There is no one to shoot back and thus deter the shooter from his maddened mission. Think about it, most of these mass shootings end with the suicide of the killer after he has accomplished his goal. Few are ever killed by authorities or captured.
Read More: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/12/good_g...
Top Opinion
-
Kronan_1 2012/12/15 18:06:51



















The worst school killing didn't use guns at all, it was dynamite. The year 1927 in Bath, Michigan, an irate person by the name of Kehoe who was miffed over school taxes set timed dynamite inside a school in various places on the beams that held up the school structure and blew up the school killing 38 children. The principle got a bunch of kids out and to a safe place saw Kehoe running across the grass towards his car and when the principle went to talk to him, Kehoe blew up his car killing himself, the principal and 3 bystanders. So this type of thing has been going on because people who are nuts do nutty things. Gun bans will do nothing at all to stop this. When they ban guns, then the murders will use bombs, knives, pipe bombs anything they can get. And making these things are easy as hell.
Every staff member who passes the qualifications should be trained to defend their school from armed attackers, their classroom or office should have a (well secured) gun locker with a semi automatic rifle, ammo, a flack jacket and helmet.
That might make a difference. Both in terms of response and in terms of prevention because I don't think most mass shooters desire heavy and immediate opposition, they seem to like soft targets.
Sheep or free people?
OP blocked me because he doesn't like it when people fight back. sounds like a bitch move to me.
A gun will be used in an infinitely small percentage of the time that you own it. At any point when you are not using it in self-defense, something can go wrong. Weapons are more difficult to properly use and maintain without special training than realized by most people. Guns are harder to aim than people think and firing one accurately in a crisis situation is even more difficult. Emergencies are unpredictable. “You can’t say you will be prepared and safe because you have a gun. You never know what you might be facing. You will be able to hedge your defenses much better if you instead invest in a very good security system.” Guns are dangerous. “There is no safety that can’t be overcome, by a six year old....In another horrifying scenario, what if you are disarmed…? Now your weapon is his weapon…” Even in a best case scenario, you might have to kill someone. 65% of offenders are known to their victims; consider the possibility that the target will be a loved one, friend, or neighbor. I’ll add one more: every gun owner that insists that if they had been at that latest mass shooting, with their trusty gun, that lives would have been saved are assuming flawless execution. Who knows what happens when you start a crossfire in a crowded public space? That’s why police prioritize evacuating as many people as possible from the area before engaging the shooter.