Quantcast

'God Hates Gays' On Utah Road Construction Sign (VIDEO)

(▪‿▪)DoctorWhoGuru(▪‿▪) 2012/08/11 00:27:55


Read More: http://www.advocate.com/society/2012/08/10/provo-u...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • P. Sturm 2012/09/16 15:46:37
    P. Sturm
    +1
    There sure was a speed-of-light response from the cops, 4 1/2 hours.
  • ghostrider 2012/09/09 03:51:16
    ghostrider
    +1
    Interesting how 'god' is used to promote hate and intolerance ... glad I don't subscribe to the concept.
  • Random 2012/09/04 12:40:24
    Random
    +1
    "The foremost is, 'Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is one Lord; and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.' "The second is this, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no other commandment greater than these." (NAS, Mark 12:28-31)
    Jesus hates no one, people!
  • Leeaqua 2012/08/29 17:17:04
    Leeaqua
    +1
    That is soooo sick o ! Why does one have to have their religious dogma displayed for the rest of the population ? ? ? I don't want to see it, hear it or have it legislated ! If you cna't be progressive, go form your own narrow minded , ignorant country or state !
  • MrSexyPants 2012/08/20 05:14:19
    MrSexyPants
    +1
    wow. just... wow. i don't even have words...
  • Angel* 2012/08/14 03:57:40
    Angel*
    +1
    What God hates is lost time these idiots wasted making this sign rather then helping
    someone in need.
  • sjalan 2012/08/12 06:16:06
    sjalan
    +2
    And the question remains, can a country that endorses a religion of love survive when that religion also preaches hatred.

    The answer is NO!
  • NoHandlebarsAttached 2012/08/12 00:43:29
    NoHandlebarsAttached
    +1
    Welcome to America.
  • elijahin24 2012/08/12 00:26:17
    elijahin24
    +1
    Imagine my surprise.
  • Lily 2012/08/12 00:13:48
    Lily
    +1
    To personally hold up a sign while picketing is freedom of speech, to have a solo sign displaying such hate is a state problem and could Utah look any worse already?
  • Dyonus 2012/08/11 21:42:04
    Dyonus
    +2
    I honestly couldn't tell you if homosexuality is a sin (nor do I care), but it if is...God doesn't hate sinners. If that were the case, he would hate ALL of mankind. For ALL have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

    God doesn't discriminate against certain sinners over others.

    Honestly, people like that make me sad because they make Christians as a whole look bad and not all Christians feel that way. I personally have nothing against homosexuals regardless of my faith. Some of the homosexuals I've met are actually nicer than some of the Christians I've met. Go figure.
  • ttfndude 2012/08/11 17:55:59
    ttfndude
    +2
    okay if a christian TRULY follows the good book they will see (I am not debating this just being devils advocate) that God loves All people but hates Sin which if you follow word for word being gay is a Sin. So the sign should not read "God hates gays" because he doesn't it should say "God hates the sin of men sleeping with other men".....not as catchy I know just sayin!
  • kingmike525 2012/08/11 13:43:54
    kingmike525
    +2
    The home of the Mormons is also the home of the Morons.....
  • PandoraBoxe 2012/08/11 12:31:24
    PandoraBoxe
    +1
    what an ass to have put that on a road sign
  • NumptyNuts 2012/08/11 09:22:39
    NumptyNuts
    +1
    I do not understand the hate thing. Jesus embraced everyone. EVERYONE!. The bible and Koran are contradictory and open to interpretation and that's the crux of the matter. How come the main religions exclude groups of Gods children? I was at the Gay Pride Parade in Belfast and it was amazing. There was enough goodwill and love to fuel the planet. However, there were "Christians" protesting. I'm confused!? Love thy neighbour ... NO way it seems. I know a very referred minister who has the bible in one hand and his dick in the other. He assaulted youngsters. The Vatican is corrupt to the core. Being Gay is genetic. Being prejudiced is a choice ... who would you rather go out on the town with?
  • HillaryLover 2012/08/11 07:28:32
    HillaryLover
    +1
    God is NOT a hater.
  • Eddie 2012/08/11 07:03:04
    Eddie
    +1
    This is just too stupid to comment on.
  • Tom R 007 2012/08/11 06:58:08 (edited)
    Tom R 007
    +1
    Why do people keep saying that God hates gays? He obviously doesn't. He loves everyone. Even if homosexuality is a sin (which I'm not entirely convinced that it is. I have my own theories) all sins are the same in the eyes of the Lord, so that means, by their logic, that God hates everyone because we all sin. Yes, including the people who put these signs up.
  • Tastentier Tom R 007 2012/08/11 09:38:52
    Tastentier
    +2
    That's a good point. Do you think there would be the same outrage if the sign said "god hates adulterers", "god hates promiscuity", or "god hates divorce"?
  • Tom R 007 Tastentier 2012/08/11 10:05:26
    Tom R 007
    +1
    The outrage would probably be worse because more people would probably fall into those categories. The problem is that the "Christians" who walk around with "God Hates Fags" signs clearly don't know God. If they did, they would know that God doesn't hate anyone. What he hates is the sins we commit. So even if homosexuality was a sin, in God's eyes it is no worse than committing adultery, stealing, lying and every other sin mentioned in the Bible. These morons who put up signs like this really need to learn to love their neighbour.
  • Tastentier Tom R 007 2012/08/11 11:08:50 (edited)
    Tastentier
    +1
    That was my point :) I'm not religious, but I know that according to the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than adultery or divorce. And yet there is no public outrage when a preacher says that adultery is wrong and sinful. Everyone agrees that cheating on one's partner is morally questionable.

    Religious morality aside, cheating also increases the STD risk of both the cheater and their steady partner, which is exactly why this taboo was naturally selected for. Socio-religious taboos are the product of natural selection, which tends to select against dangerous behavior.
    Of course we also all agree that adultery shouldn't be a criminal offense. It should be up to people's own conscience. But should cheating be openly promoted? Should there be a call for public acceptance and tolerance of adultery? That's the other extreme, imho.

    The same goes for homosexuality. Like I said, I'm not religious, so it doesn't matter to me how anybody's god supposedly feels about gays. But it's hard to ignore the fact that taboos, as well as feelings of disgust, are instincts that have been naturally selected for. The reason is obvious in this case: Even in the age of condoms and safe-sex education, the STD rates among men who have sex with men is about 40% higher than among the rest of the population.

    I...




    That was my point :) I'm not religious, but I know that according to the Bible, homosexuality is no worse than adultery or divorce. And yet there is no public outrage when a preacher says that adultery is wrong and sinful. Everyone agrees that cheating on one's partner is morally questionable.

    Religious morality aside, cheating also increases the STD risk of both the cheater and their steady partner, which is exactly why this taboo was naturally selected for. Socio-religious taboos are the product of natural selection, which tends to select against dangerous behavior.
    Of course we also all agree that adultery shouldn't be a criminal offense. It should be up to people's own conscience. But should cheating be openly promoted? Should there be a call for public acceptance and tolerance of adultery? That's the other extreme, imho.

    The same goes for homosexuality. Like I said, I'm not religious, so it doesn't matter to me how anybody's god supposedly feels about gays. But it's hard to ignore the fact that taboos, as well as feelings of disgust, are instincts that have been naturally selected for. The reason is obvious in this case: Even in the age of condoms and safe-sex education, the STD rates among men who have sex with men is about 40% higher than among the rest of the population.

    It's important to keep in mind that men who have sex with men (MSMs) are a much larger group than gays. This group contains bi-curious, bisexual, pansexual, and even straight-identified men who simply don't care if they have sex with a fleshlight, an inflatable doll, or a person that they don't really find attractive.
    Another important point is that many MSMs live in a heterosexual marriage or relationship. In many cases, their only reason to cheat is that their wife or girlfriend can't satisfy their occasional same-sex desires.

    While there is nothing inherently wrong with same-sex interests, these men are not only putting their own health at risk. They're also gambling with the health of their female partners. HPV (human papillomavirus) infection, for example, is usually harmless for men, but it considerably increases the risk of cervical cancer in women. Condoms do little to prevent HPV, since the virus can be present in the entire pubic or mouth area. It can also be transferred through hand-to-genital contact, oral-genital contact, and kissing.

    Gays actually constitute a rather small percentage of MSMs. While gays have no choice in this matter and shouldn't be discriminated against for their natural feelings, other MSMs *do* have a choice. People who aren't exlusively gay might not act on their same-sex interests if homosexuality was treated like adultery: Perfectly legal, but not advertised as something positive and cute that should be celebrated in parades. If homosexuality is normalized and openly celebrated, there will be an understandable backlash from both religious and non-religious people with strong moral instincts.
    (more)
  • Tom R 007 Tastentier 2012/08/11 11:12:38
    Tom R 007
    Well I am religious, and the way these so-called "Christians" behave disgust me.
  • Tastentier Tom R 007 2012/08/11 11:33:52 (edited)
    Tastentier
    +1
    I agree that this is a nasty extreme, and I feel sorry for all gay people who had to read this message. But there is no effect without a cause. This is one extreme, gay pride parades and aggressive activism are the other. If both sides dialed it down a little, they might actually be able to get along.

    I know a number of BDSM lifestylers. They, too, only follow their natural inclinations. They have felt the need to dominate or submit, to inflinct pain or feel pain since their early teenage years. And there is nothing wrong with the consensual things they do in their bedrooms, dungeons and darkrooms. Their sexual activities have both been decriminalized and de-pathologized, they don't bother the general public with their sexual interests, everyone is happy.

    Now imagine a BDSM rights movement. "Sexual slavery is normal! End the discrimination! Stop demonizing sadism and masochism!" A BDSM lifestyler in every other TV show. BDSM education and bondage safety instructions in schools. BDSM pride parades with collars and leashes, whips and chains. Activism for marriage contracts that allow legal slave ownership.

    Don't you think this would upset the current social equilibrium between kinksters and "vanilla" people, as they call ordinary folks? What is so wrong with "we leave you alone if you leave us alone"?
  • Tom R 007 Tastentier 2012/08/11 11:40:00
    Tom R 007
    +1
    I've always said that extremists in any group, religious or otherwise, are bad news. I've encountered many atheist extremists too. The ones who feel that they can state as absolute FACT that God DEFINITELY doesn't exist and that anyone who believes in God is a complete moron. They annoy me as much as the religious extremists who go around telling people that they're going to Hell and that God hates them. If there were less extremists in the world and more tolerance, imagine how great this world would be.
  • Tastentier Tom R 007 2012/08/11 12:07:34 (edited)
    Tastentier
    +1
    I used to be one of those atheist activists after I deconverted :) Everyone wants to change the world when they're young I guess. It's always hard to keep an open mind and try to understand the other side.

    I still don't understand religion and spiritual feelings because I lack the spiritual disposition of the majority. But I do understand by now that religion serves an important purpose, which is one reason why I jumped off the liberal "gay is good" bandwagon.

    I see religion as a behavioral modifier that promotes moral and family values and increases reproductive success. People often say that God is in all of us, and that's true insofar that religious morality reflects our natural moral instincts. If people with a different moral compass are raised by a religious family, they learn to accept the moral norm of society and are more inclined to act in a way that benefits everyone.

    I mean no offense when I explain religion in a naturalistic way. This is simply the only way in which I can understand it. The important part is that while I'm personally not compatible with religion, I can respect it and accept the fact that people like myself are a minority. We have to try and fit in, or at least try and get along with the Christian majority.

    The same goes for all minorities, imho. We ...
    I used to be one of those atheist activists after I deconverted :) Everyone wants to change the world when they're young I guess. It's always hard to keep an open mind and try to understand the other side.

    I still don't understand religion and spiritual feelings because I lack the spiritual disposition of the majority. But I do understand by now that religion serves an important purpose, which is one reason why I jumped off the liberal "gay is good" bandwagon.

    I see religion as a behavioral modifier that promotes moral and family values and increases reproductive success. People often say that God is in all of us, and that's true insofar that religious morality reflects our natural moral instincts. If people with a different moral compass are raised by a religious family, they learn to accept the moral norm of society and are more inclined to act in a way that benefits everyone.

    I mean no offense when I explain religion in a naturalistic way. This is simply the only way in which I can understand it. The important part is that while I'm personally not compatible with religion, I can respect it and accept the fact that people like myself are a minority. We have to try and fit in, or at least try and get along with the Christian majority.

    The same goes for all minorities, imho. We can't change or reprogram the majority population in our favor. We have to accept that the moral norm is the norm for a good reason. If the norm doesn't work for us, we can do our own thing, but not to the point where we step on other people's toes. That goes for atheists, gays, and the Westboro Baptist church alike.
    (more)
  • Tom R 007 Tastentier 2012/08/11 12:26:49
    Tom R 007
    +1
    I was an atheist for the first 26 years of my life, my family are still atheist as are most of my friends, so I understand both sides. I would never claim it as 100% fact that God exists though. It's just my belief that he does. I think that all intelligent people are agnostic to some extent. By that I mean that they know that it's impossible to state God's existence or non-existence as fact. I am 99% certain that God exists, but I'm certainly not arrogant enough to make it 100%. The fact is that if I'm wrong, and there is no God, then I'm no worse off than anyone else on the planet. We all die in the end :-)
  • Chris 2012/08/11 06:38:25 (edited)
    Chris
    +1
    disagree.. this is called evolution :D
  • Fariborz-Zak 2012/08/11 06:35:46
    Fariborz-Zak
    agree
  • dallasjoe 2012/08/11 04:55:31
    dallasjoe
    One thing you can say they are not Hypocrits in Utah
  • Cliff 2012/08/11 03:51:44
    Cliff
    Ooooops....they got the sign backwards. It should read "Gay hate God".
  • sue 2012/08/11 02:59:39
    sue
    +2
    gol has pure loves he loves the sinner but hates the sin, sin = deaths unless we repent and ask forgivness, he will forgive all your sins .
  • Ninja 2012/08/11 02:47:33
    Ninja
    +2
    hmm, that fact god is in heaven kind of makes it impossible for him to make a sign about what he does and does not hate. Screw you bright lights.
  • Max7 2012/08/11 02:18:22
    Max7
    +2
    God does not hate Gay's, he hates what constitutes being gay, just like lieing, murder and any other sin.
  • dallasjoe Max7 2012/08/11 04:56:32
    dallasjoe
    or rape
  • Max7 dallasjoe 2012/08/11 23:36:15
    Max7
    Rape is sin
  • Frannin 2012/08/11 02:04:12
    Frannin
    +1
    So tragic that some folk have such closed minds. The sign insults my sense of justice.
    Pity the poor souls who cannot tolerate anyone unlike themselves. They make a boring
    world out of their existence.
  • Dan der... Frannin 2012/08/11 04:19:28
    Dan der Mensch
    They generated a thread on SH, so their existence isn't all boring.
  • Rock 2012/08/11 02:01:37
    Rock
    +1
    Wow, just wow.

    I don't understand why people use god to justify their own points of view. Cowardly is all I can think.
  • Me 2012/08/11 01:39:29
    Me
    +1
    wow...so not cool
  • luvguins 2012/08/11 01:24:23
    luvguins
    +1
    Evangelicals could reprogram it to God hates Mormon cults!

News & Politics

2013/05/22 13:44:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals