Global warming: real or scam?

NASA is in the news again but this time for its scientists who have
proven they have a spine. Apparently 49 NASA scientists, many of them
astronauts, have strongly objected to those who use the Agency as a
political football. Their letter to the Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.,
NASA Administrator, denouncing global warming as bad science and
excoriating NASA for propounding the idea, appears at the end of this
article.

For those who don’t know or remember, my co-editor and co-founder of Conservative News and Views,
Terry Hurlbut, was the first journalist to report that the global
warming alarmists were deliberately misleading the public. Terry exposed the now famous emails that confirmed that the global warming theory was a first class scam.
Terry and those who insisted on empirical data to support the theory of
global warming have suffered much ridicule by the media elites. But now
those 49 scientists have vindicated them. In so vindicating, they have
confirmed something else that Terry found: that NASA had become America’s CRU.

The
Hubert Lamb Building, headquarters of the Climatic Research Unit,
University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK. Photo: User
ChrisO/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License.

Whether or not global warming is happening, and if it is, whether
carbon dioxide emissions are causing it, is not the point of this
article. The point is that no one made non-political scientific
evaluations. Since the days of Galileo, we have known that politics and
science do not mix well. Ironically, “political scientists” have often
used the plight of Galileo to censor the quest to develop honest
scientific data that may or may not conflict with popular theories.
Nowhere is this irony more clear than in the Evolution/Creation battle.
Using Galileo as their poster boy against creation science,
evolutionists have successfully censored the contradictions to their
theory from public classrooms. They have taken this tactic so far as to
fight to keep known scientific errors in textbooks – the most notable is
Haeckels’ embryo drawings, which reputable biologists have known to be
fraudulent since the late 1800s.

As if scientific censorship isn’t bad enough, political agendas have added to this hysteria. Globalists and those trying to usher in
a New World Order have seized upon the global warming theory to propel
their hidden agendas. The most noteworthy is UN Agenda 21. If
successful, Agenda 21 will swallow up our national sovereignty and
subject us to a one world order – all in the name of sustaining the
environment and protecting it from global warming.

Don’t take my word for it, read the letter below and draw your own conclusions.

March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.

NASA Administrator

NASA Headquarters

Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard
Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven
remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA
and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact
on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when
considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of
well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists
publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming
particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is
NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change
is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of
all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public
statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme
position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact
of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA
refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future
releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the
exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and
employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern,
we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or
others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science

CC: Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center

Read more here.