Quantcast

Global Warming Hoax: AGU's Gleick & NASA's Hansen Complicit in Conspiracy

Wolfman 2012/03/11 07:00:34
Comment on the Global Warming Hoax if you wish.
I believe the Global Warming foolishness anyway.
You!
Add Photos & Videos
FBI agents are urged to grill others linked to self-confessed
climate criminal, Dr. Peter Gleick in the 'Fakegate’ climate
counterfeiting scandal. Evidence now points to NASA’s Dr. James Hansen
as accomplice in global warming racket.



Dr. Peter Gleick resigned last Thursday as chairman of the American
Geophysical Union's Task Force on Scientific Ethics. Ross Rice, an FBI
agent and spokesman from the Chicago field office confirmed an FBI probe
is under way, “We are currently working with the [Heartland] institute
and the U.S. Attorney’s office in Chicago.”



Climate criminals seem to gravitate to the AGU with circumstantial
evidence now tying Gleick, Hansen and the AGU in a climate conspiracy.



Dr. Gleick's rapid fall from grace has mired other top tier
climatologists in what may become a full-blown wire fraud and RICO
racketeering investigation by federal authorities. Leading critics are
sure that the elements of 18 USC 1343 appear already met under admitted facts.



Questions will now need to be asked about AGU’s role in enabling Hansen make a notorious presentation to Congress on June 23, 1988; all thanks to a dubious ‘peer-reviewed’ paper of his that AGU brusquely shoehorned through.



Now identity thief Peter Gleick has been exposed as the forger
of at least one document used to defame the Heartland Institute, a
well-known free trade policy think tank. Gleick admitted to Huffington Post
readers that he handled stolen and forged documents. His intent was to
injure others – a crime under U.S. Law. Actual financial harm occurred
due to Gleick's unlawful release of Heartland's donor list and
contributions; one donor has since withdrawn funding.



However, none of the documents produced by Gleick (other than the fake
strategy document) reveal any smoking guns against Heartland. But
already, astute investigators have found a worrying link between Gleick,
Dr. James Hansen and the American Geophysical Unit (AGU) that may yet
point to a real smoking gun in U.S. climate fraud racketeering from
1988.



Gleick, Hansen and the AGU Complicit in the 'Greatest Crime'



Hansen's paper, foretelling of a world of catastrophic man-made global
warming was 'peer reviewed’ to sway an otherwise skeptical Congress. The
AGU is thus a vehicle of dubious patronage.



Hansen misled elected officials by deceitfully claiming that carbon
dioxide (CO2) from ocean out-gassing and other natural vents has
different carbon ratios 'signature' than human 'fossil fuel' emissions.
Hansen then successfully duped policymakers into believing human CO2
emissions were linked to global warming. But the truth is that there is
no way to distinguish between natural or man-made sources of CO2.
Hansen's paper was thus not up to the scientific standard necessary for
publication and should never have passed proper peer review.



Thus Hansen’s Congressional charade precipitated the U.S. government’s
resolve to fight global ‘greenhouse gas’ warming and blow $100 billion
tackling a proven non-problem (despite 30 percent rises in carbon
dioxide emissions global temperatures have fallen this century).



Federal agents now have a green light to apply RICO statutes, designed to root out racketeering, based on the following facts:



As a self-confessed climate criminal Dr. Peter Gleick faces
incarceration. He has already admitted to being implicated in identity
theft, stealing private documents and falsifying evidence to defame, and
thus injure the Heartland Institute and others. Gleick is linked via
the AGU to Hansen's 1988 paper and by association to other scientists
suspected of fraud (inc. hockey stick graph conjurer, Michael Mann).



Over the decades such unprincipled alarmists stand accused of filching
millions in taxpayer funds by exploiting public fears in a phony global
warming narrative.

On other fronts, Virginia, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is a
high-profile prosecutor adamant he will continue the fight on behalf of
the Commonwealth’s taxpayers and expose Michael Mann's hidden misdeeds.



Meanwhile, in Vancouver popular skeptic climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball is making strides defending vexatious libel suits filed separately by
Dr. Michael Mann and Dr. Andrew Weaver. History will eventually join all
such pieces of the puzzle to show how just extensive the climate fraud
truly was.


More: http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=9212&linkbox;=true&po...

Read More: http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=9212&linkb...

Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • closinyou 2012/03/11 21:32:04 (edited)
    Comment on the Global Warming Hoax if you wish.
    closinyou
    +1
    So, what was the point of the hoax? CONTROL and MANIPULATION!

    Too bad the real players and pushers aren't going to be held accountable!
  • Wolfman closinyou 2012/03/11 21:39:07
    Wolfman
    +1
    Hansen is a good place to start. Put him in prison.
  • closinyou Wolfman 2012/03/11 21:43:43
    closinyou
    +1
    Agreed!
  • Wolfman closinyou 2012/03/11 21:46:46
    Wolfman
    +1
    The point of his hoax was funding.
  • closinyou Wolfman 2012/03/12 00:31:32
    closinyou
    +1
    Maybe I misunderstand the situation. Isn't funding always the point, at least initially. We can't stop there though. In my opinion funding wasn't the driving force behind this. It was part of it but not all of it!
  • Wolfman closinyou 2012/03/12 00:47:51
    Wolfman
    +1
    The driving force for scientists who sell their integrity like Hansen, Jones, Mann and others is funding and grants for further studies; i. e., money. For people like Gore the AGW incentive is carbon credits and wealth; money again. But for people like Obama and those in the UN the incentive is power and control.
  • closinyou Wolfman 2012/03/12 03:20:59
    closinyou
    +1
    We are in full agreement then. We're saying the same thing. Sadly, Hanson who is probably a man of descent character, will wind up facing the consequences that belong to our current administration as well as our future one!

    "If you once forfeit the confidence of your fellow citizens, you can never regain their respect and esteem. It is true that you may fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

    - Abraham Lincoln
  • JanHopkins 2012/03/11 10:16:34
    Comment on the Global Warming Hoax if you wish.
    JanHopkins
    +1
    Well, well, well. This should prove interesting.
  • Wolfman JanHopkins 2012/03/11 20:47:56
    Wolfman
    Indeed. Thanks for responding.
  • Icarus 2012/03/11 09:11:34
    I believe the Global Warming foolishness anyway.
    Icarus
    James Hansen is a hero. While people like you are frenetically pretending that AGW isn't real, Hansen is alerting the world to the danger we face, and trying to get something done about it. To be honest, I'm almost 100% sure that it's too late and that we're (collectively) too short-sighted and combative to actually get together and solve the problem... even if it's solvable, which is very much in doubt. Nevertheless, Hansen deserves the highest possible accolades for standing up and being counted, with the best interests of humanity at heart, and at great personal risk.

    He is, absolutely, a reluctant hero.

    Gleick was certainly unwise in the way he tried to expose Heartland's AGW denial hoax, and their conspiracy to deceive schoolchildren about climate science, but we all know he had the best of intentions. If the FBI are to investigate anyone it ought to be Heartland, and all the other AGW denial hoax organisations, and the fossil fuel billionaires who are funding them, and the politicians they bribe to do their bidding.
  • jojac Icarus 2012/03/11 10:38:49
    jojac
    +1
    You're right about him warning about the danger being faced. And that he has "humanity
    at heart". He is veiling the truth though. The danger he sees is over population,
    too many people to get control over them. Got to deceive them into accepting more control,
    meanwhile there will be this and that crisis created, which will kill thousands, such as
    false flag events, you know, nuclear explosions in large cities, bird and pig viruses,
    etc.
  • Icarus jojac 2012/03/11 23:14:39
    Icarus
    Certainly overpopulation is a massive problem, but there are numerous problems all occurring at once, and overpopulation just exacerbates all of them (global warming, soil erosion, ocean acidification, shortage of fresh water and so on).
  • jojac Icarus 2012/03/13 05:38:54
    jojac
    +1
    I didn't mean that the world is over populated, only that some think it is.
    The world is NOT lover ;populated. Granted there are nations with massive
    starvation The nations that have languished in long term famine are ones
    that have rejected the true God. God alone has the right to determine who
    will be born and when Global warming is a myth. Water can be purified by
    several methods. Man is not creating too much carbon dioxide. Man requires
    oxygen which vegetation gives off and they thrive on carbon dioxide.
    All of the worlds problems can be solved just simply by people honoring and
    obeying the true God.; But the majority will not honor and obey Him, They had
    rather go to hell for eternity, than to bow down before Him and acknowledge that
    He is greater than they are. But they WILL bow down and acknowledge that
    He is LORD, one day very soon. Tragically for most, it will be too late.
  • Icarus jojac 2012/03/13 07:26:18
    Icarus
    Don't be ridiculous.
  • jojac Icarus 2012/04/11 05:08:17
    jojac
    +1
    What is ridiculous in what I said?
  • Icarus jojac 2012/04/11 06:37:32
    Icarus
    Everything you said about 'god', but also the statement that the world is not over-populated. Sustainable global population is probably just a few hundred million.
  • jojac Icarus 2012/04/16 03:56:48
    jojac
    +1
    I didn't say anything about god. I spoke about God.
    And we were told that we would starve to death in the
    60's I believe it was. It appears that we didn't.

    There has been well over "a few hundred million"
    for a good while. Yes, there has been long term
    starvation in some nations, but that is because they
    reject the true God. If all would worship the true God
    there would be NO long term hunger. God is able to
    supply the needs of all the people that He puts here.

    The problems man faces results from his rebellion
    against God. Man keeps thinking that he can create
    Utopia by himself and that he doesn't need God.
  • Icarus jojac 2012/04/16 08:57:42
    Icarus
    Sorry but you're clearly living in a fantasy world. Gods and goddesses aren't real things you know - they're characters in religious mythology, i.e. fiction. They're no more real than Harry Potter or The Hobbit.
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/04/16 15:48:47
    Wolfman
    Or AGW. LOL
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/04/16 16:31:00
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/11 20:50:29
    Wolfman
    Hansen lied before Congress and you hero is going to jail. He will meet Gleick in prison, no doubt.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/11 23:16:10
    Icarus
    Interestingly, Richard Lindzen is the one who lied to Congress, not Hansen. I doubt Lindzen will ever be brought to justice now, but time will tell.
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 00:37:35
    Wolfman
    Interestingly, in 1988, Dr. James E. Hansen testified before the Senate about the impending doom of global warming. Dr. Hansen testified again on 23 June 2008. He lied both times. Put the sucker in jail.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 10:45:42 (edited)
    Icarus
    Hansen has been proven right by observations for 30 years now. Lindzen has been proven wrong by observations. You tell me who was lying.

    hansen proven observations 30 years lindzen proven wrong observations lying
    Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - Hansen et al 1981
    http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/doc...

    atmospheric carbon dioxide hansen al 1981 httppubs giss nasa govdoc
    http://www.skepticalscience.c...
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 15:29:39
    Wolfman
    Hansen is a liar.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 15:49:37
    Icarus
    Hansen has been proven right for over 30 years. Can you cite *any* climate science deniers whose projections have been proven right for 30 years?

    Of course you can't, because there aren't any.
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 15:53:33
    Wolfman
    Hansen is a proven liar.

    global warming myth
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 15:56:39 (edited)
    Icarus
    Evasion noted.

    Hansen has been proven right by observations for 30 years now. Lindzen has been proven wrong by observations. You tell me who was lying.

    hansen proven observations 30 years lindzen proven wrong observations lying
    Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - Hansen et al 1981
    http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/doc...

    atmospheric carbon dioxide hansen al 1981 httppubs giss nasa govdoc
    http://www.skepticalscience.c...
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 16:05:42
    Wolfman
    Hansen is a liar.

    no agw
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 16:08:13
    Icarus
    Hansen has been proven right by observations for 30 years now. Lindzen has been proven wrong by observations. You tell me who was lying.

    hansen proven observations 30 years lindzen proven wrong observations lying
    Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - Hansen et al 1981
    http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/doc...

    atmospheric carbon dioxide hansen al 1981 httppubs giss nasa govdoc
    http://www.skepticalscience.c...
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 16:11:20
    Wolfman
    Stop spamming my blog with the same lies or I'll have to block you.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 16:12:58
    Icarus
    Then stop answering facts with conspiracy theory garbage.
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 16:14:30
    Wolfman
    I have answered your debunked data with the truth.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 16:17:28 (edited)
    Icarus
    You can't handle the fact that your AGW denial hoax is being thoroughly debunked. Remember: I give it about 3 years. Then the architects of the hoax will be starting to panic. Once the Arctic ice cap disappears, there will be no more AGW deniers -


    architects hoax starting panic arctic ice cap disappears agw deniers
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 16:25:11
    Wolfman
    Have you looked at this graph?

    global warming myth
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 16:32:17
    Icarus
    As far as I can tell, this was from 21 years ago. Today the AMS say:

    "...strong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change."
    http://www.ametsoc.org/policy...

    The AGU say:

    "Many components of the climate system—including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons—are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century"
    http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/po...
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 17:11:34
    Wolfman
    Translated, that means that AGW is a myth.
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/12 17:59:10
    Icarus
    How so?
  • Wolfman Icarus 2012/03/12 19:35:31
    Wolfman
    CO2 is not a warming driver and has little effect on temperature.

    agwnot2
  • Icarus Wolfman 2012/03/13 10:42:15
    Icarus
    Well, how much effect on temperature *does* it have? Based on what evidence?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/19 13:39:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals