Germany's Former First Lady Sues Google for 'Prostitute' Algorithm: Whose Side Are You On?
AdriHead
2012/09/12 22:21:28
|
|
|||||
|
210 votes
|
|
36% | |||
|
369 votes
|
|
64% | |||
Bettina Wulff, Germany's former first lady, is not a prostitute -- and she want you to know it. The wife of former German President Christian Wulff is suing Google over its autocomplete function while searching, which shows the words "prostitute" and "escort" after Wulff's name is typed out.

The former German first lady says she's never been a prostitute but that rumors circulated about her allegedly racy past around 2006, most likely to harm her husband's political career. Wulff may not be a prostitute, but do you think the lawsuit is fair? Or is Google being sued for all the wrong reasons?
NYDAILYNEWS.COM reports:


The former German first lady says she's never been a prostitute but that rumors circulated about her allegedly racy past around 2006, most likely to harm her husband's political career. Wulff may not be a prostitute, but do you think the lawsuit is fair? Or is Google being sued for all the wrong reasons?
NYDAILYNEWS.COM reports:
Germany’s former first lady is not happy with her Google results. Bettina Wulff, 38, is suing the search giant over their autocomplete function, which she argues perpetuates rumors that she was once a prostitute.

Read More: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/bettina-wulf...
Top Opinion
-
Mog of War 2012/09/12 22:29:44Team Google!+12Google's autocomplete feature is base on popular searches. Deal with it. Google could probably filter this from their autocomplete, and likely will, so this lawsuit is pointless.






















She should have educated herself on "the bizarre random way" Google search works (are you serious?) before filing a LAWSUIT.
She may not be a whore, but she sure as hell is an ATTENTION whore.
That is a fact, neither vicious nor spiteful.
However, they did magnify and reinforce that reality with every hit. But, overall, Google is not the responsible party and allowing this would really be a can of worms.
I also searched wuff and wuff wuff came up and it could mean Google thought she was a dog. She should sue google and all dogs. And all dogs who work at Google.
As much as I want Bernanke’s move to be a meaningful epitaph to the legislative stupidity of Congress and the Executive Branch, I am afraid it will just be another tiny pebble in the road to ruin.
The day rapidly approaches when the most popular question on Main Street becomes: “What the HELL were they thinking?"
There was not a single site that would justify google autocomplete to suggest that she was or is a prostitute. Google needs to be more careful who they hire to create the autocomplete database.
That's not how it works though. Google is not a news agency; it helps you find what you are looking for.
If enough people look for "Bettina Wullf prostituierte" to specifically search for articles on that subject, Google search suggests the same term for anyone else searching for "Bettina Wulff", to save them time.
The autocomplete function simply suggest words that OTHER USERS associate with the search, and in this case, it happened to be "escort" and "prostituierte" because a lot of people were trying to find out if those rumor were true, and searched for that.
The third suggestion is "height" because apparently a lot of non-German people were also interested in her height for some reason
.
See how that works? And do you see now how ridiculous and moronic it is to sue Google for showing popular search results?
"Google needs to be more careful who they hire to create the autocomplete database."
Please explain how an autocomplete function should work.
Maybe I'll get to go back in a few years.
BMO's and dust dirt are the pits.
I came back with all three.
I still have the car and the clock.
http://nozama.typepad.com/.a/...
One of my favorite places.