Germany bans ultraconservative Islamic organization amid raids across the country. Do you think our government should forget about being PC and start doing the same here?
Selketskiss
2012/06/17 18:42:59
|
|
|||||
|
40 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
10% | |||
Is Germany waking up to the threat of these Islamic organizations. I believe our government needs to wake up also and raid the 35 terrorist training camps here on US soil.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/06/14/germany-bans-salafist...
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=418566
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/381953/
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/06/14/germany-bans-salafist...
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=418566
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/381953/
Top Opinion
-
Boris Badinov 2012/06/18 00:38:43Yes

















See this educational video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Additionally, each and every right under the Constitution is subject to restraint or forfeiture, if it conflicts with the constitutional rights of others. For example, we all have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness under the Constitution. But if you kill your neighbor because his dog crapped on your lawn, you can lose all those rights.
So too things like the "Jim Jones kool-aid party" and what the Quran commands are NOT protected under the Constitution. Courts are required to apply the "balancing of the scales" analysis, when opposing sides in a case maintain that they have a right under the Constitution. And the judge must determine WHICH side has the greater claim to "right" under the Constitution and which side would suffer the greatest harm by allowing the opposing side to exercise the right that they claim.
To put things in perspective, YOU play the judge in the following case, then tell us your verdict:
Side A alleges it has a right to kill, oppress...
See this educational video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Additionally, each and every right under the Constitution is subject to restraint or forfeiture, if it conflicts with the constitutional rights of others. For example, we all have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness under the Constitution. But if you kill your neighbor because his dog crapped on your lawn, you can lose all those rights.
So too things like the "Jim Jones kool-aid party" and what the Quran commands are NOT protected under the Constitution. Courts are required to apply the "balancing of the scales" analysis, when opposing sides in a case maintain that they have a right under the Constitution. And the judge must determine WHICH side has the greater claim to "right" under the Constitution and which side would suffer the greatest harm by allowing the opposing side to exercise the right that they claim.
To put things in perspective, YOU play the judge in the following case, then tell us your verdict:
Side A alleges it has a right to kill, oppress and annihilate anyone who refuses to believe as they do.
Side B alleges that they have a right to NOT be killed, oppressed or annihilated.
So please tell us, WHICH side, side A or side B, would you rule in favor of.
If you say side A, then you have violated the Constitution. If you say side B, then you have ruled that Islam is NOT a "religion" for 1st Amendment purposes.
That's what I think.
Hamburg, Germany was over-run by Muslimes and the same thing has been allowed to occur in Dearborn, Michigan.... not that the Detroit area was worth saving anyway.
So the U.S. has 35 known terrorist training camps within our borders and the illustrious cabal of jackasses ... aka 0bozo, Holder, Nappytano & Clinton have no problem with it whatsoever.
Let THAT be yet another reason this entire administration and thought process MUST be eradicated ASAP... either at the ballot box or by whatever means necessary.