German court rules religious circumcision on boys an assault. Agree or Disagree?

THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS
Excerpts from Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective
by Ronald Goldman, Ph.D.

“I had profound doubts about my decision [to circumcise]. But because open discussion of Brit Milah seems to be discouraged in the Jewish community, I experienced my doubts privately and without comfort. . . . Thus, a rite intended to inspire feelings of Jewish unity evoked in me a sense of loss and alienation.”

“If a woman is made to distrust her most basic instinct to protect her newborn child, what feelings can she ever trust?”

“My tiny son and I sobbed our hearts out. . . . After everything I'd worked for, carrying and nurturing Joseph in the womb, having him at home against no small odds, keeping him by my side constantly since birth, nursing him whenever he needed closeness and nourishment-the circumcision was a horrible violation of all I felt we shared. I cried for days afterward.”

“I have never heard such screams. . . . Will I ever know what scars this brings to your soul? . . . What is that new look I see in your eyes? I can see pain, a certain sadness, and a loss of trust.”

“I've never even talked about this before-I thought I was the only one who worried about it.”

“I heard him cry during the time they were circumcising him. The thing that is most disturbing to me is that I can still hear his cry. . . . It was an assault on him, and on some level it was an assault on me. . . . I will go to my grave hearing that horrible wail.”

“The screams of my baby remain embedded in my bones and haunt my mind. . . . His cry sounded like he was being butchered. I lost my milk.”

“I knew that this was a terrible mistake and that it was something that no one, especially newborn babies, should ever have to endure."

CIRCUMCISION IS A WOMEN'S ISSUE

• The maternal instincts and experiences of women uniquely qualify them for the important responsibility of caring for infants and protecting them from pain and harm.

• Research demonstrates that women are generally more sensitive than men to the needs and feelings of infants, and newborn infants recognize, prefer, and are more responsive to their mothers.1

• Generally, because they are not themselves circumcised, females are not subject to the personal psychological motivations of circumcised men to perpetuate the practice (e.g., "I want him to look like me").2

• According to a recent study, circumcision can adversely affect female sexual enjoyment.3

• Any adverse psychological consequences of circumcision on males may adversely affect male-female relationships.4

• Because of the prevalence of circumcision in the United States, some potential adverse psychological effects of circumcision on males (known/unknown) may have indirect adverse social effects on women.5

• Mothers sign the majority of hospital circumcision consent forms.6

In one way, yes. In another way, no. In the "yes" sense, the practitioners of a religion should be able to practice it as their faith demands. That is a fundamental human right.



In the "no" sense, I know enough about human anatomy and physiology to understand that there is a big difference between the procedure which was performed on me and the procedure you are describing. I seriously considered a career in medicine, and my leisure studies were geared to that end for the better part of a decade. The male foreskin is not a powerful sensory organ; it actually has relatively few nerves. The female clitoris, on the other hand, is a sensory powerhouse, representing a large portion of the touch sensitivity in a woman's genital area. Whereas removing the male foreskin has a very small effect on the male sexual response (and may actually heighten it,) removing the clitoris does make a huge difference in the woman's sexual response, in some cases rendering it completely inert. It is approximately the same as comparing removing the radiator grill from a car to removing an entire wheel from the car.



One point that I would make is that these girls who are "permanently scarred" have nothing with which to compare their sexual experience, and so, apart from a bunch of people feeling sorry for them and telling them how sorry they are, they would accept whatever sexual experience they had as normal. Sex to a woman is largely an emotional thing anyway, not a physical one, so I believe that to most women, it wouldn't be that big a deal. That said, I would never encourage the practice, for the reasons I listed previously.



Whether I like the practice or not should not come into the equation. All people must be free to worship their god as they see fit, or no one is free. The only exception I can see to this would be religions which demand human sacrifice, and only that because their religion requires them to violate another human's right to life, the defense of which is one of the key elements of good government.