Quantcast

Georgetown student: "Sandra Fluke Does Not Speak for Me"

RJ~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/02 18:41:28

http://thecollegeconservative.com/2012/03/02/sandra-fluke-doe...


I’m a proud Georgetown woman upset about another Georgetown woman who may have no pride at all. How else do you explain - Ms. Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown Law student, now famous for testimony she never gave – jumping up to talk about her sex life (with the Senate Minority Leader and with the liberal media) and ask for the cost of her sex life to be subsidized by other students at a Jesuit School?

Sandra Fluke was declined the privilege (a privilege, not a right) of testifying in front of a Senate Committee on the proposed contraceptive mandate.

Her name was submitted too late to be admitted to testify. She’s not a lawyer. She’s not a member of the clergy – crucial for a hearing on religious freedom, wouldn’t you say? That’s what Representative Issa said. Her one claim to fame in the reproductive health care debate is…drumroll, please…being a student club leader! You go, Sandra! Hang those posters girl. Wear out those Sharpies.

Me? I love me some extracurricular involvement. The difference between Sandra and me is that I don’t think it qualifies me to speak in front of Congress. ”The Chair calls to the stand the captains of the intramural ultimate frisbee team!”

Having been told by Congress to more or less shut up and go home, Sandra found a sympathetic ear in Nancy Pelosi. She is not going to find one on the Georgetown Campus. She is wildly out of step.

Senate Democrats needed a show pony for this circus – and they knew they could find a liberal woman on a college campus who would willingly trot around the ring. That’s why Nancy & Pals created a photo op with all the props – the microphones, the podium, an air of pretense, and the all-important liberal media – for Sandra to tell her “story.” And it is just that – a story, told on a stage.

But Nancy Pelosi and the Liberal Media should know that they can no longer rely on college campuses as an endless source of liberal support. My colleagues and I at TheCollegeConservative are creating a new wave on campuses across the country. Every day we make it a little safer to be conservative – out in public – without fear of bad grades as a result of our views. Sandra should know we have no fear in calling out a classmate for thoughtless liberal ideology.

Sandra Fluke doesn’t speak for me. Or for Georgetown.

She doesn’t speak for those of us who worked hard to be able to choose to come to a great institution with a great tradition of faith and scholarship. She certainly can’t speak for the Jesuits who dedicated their lives to God and Education with a long established set of rules. There are only ten of them, and Ms. Fluke would do well to give them a quick read.

If she wants a more liberal sex life, she can go to Syracuse. (Syracuse, I must apologize – but we are in March and basketball matters – sorry you got caught up in this.)

Sandra doesn’t even speak for all skanks! She only speaks for the skanks who don’t want to take responsibility for their choices. That’s a tiny group of people. Hey Sandra! How about next Saturday night, you come hang out with me and my gay boyfriends! Your hair will look fabulous and you’ll get to see great musical theatre! Oh, and odds of you getting pregnant? Zero percent.

Even the oh-so-left HuffPo called Sandra out on her media sluttery: ”Fluke got the stage all to herself and was hailed as a hero by the crowd and Democratic lawmakers on the panel, all of whom rushed to appear on camera with her at the end. “Excuse me. I’d love to get a picture with our star,” Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said as she pushed her way through the packed room to Fluke.” Star of what? Star of the bedroom sex tape? When did Georgetown Law start admitting Kardashians?

Sandra, we might be on the same campus, but we are not on the same planet.

Sandra told some sob stories about how contraception isn’t covered by the Jesuit institution we attend. (Maybe they don’t cover it because, you know, they’re a Jesuit institution. Religious freedom? Anyone? Bueller?)

A student group called Plan A H*yas for Choice staged a demonstration against the university health plan last year, duct taping their mouths and chaining themselves to the statue of Georgetown’s founder on the university’s front lawn. Then, a funny thing happened – nothing. We left them there. Now Sandra has chained herself to the sinking ship of Pelosi Liberalism. She will always be remembered as a Welfare Condom Queen.

Let’s talk priorities here. It costs over $23,000 for a year at Georgetown Law. Sandra, are you telling us that you can afford that but cannot afford your own contraception? Really? Math was never my strong suit, but something about Sandra’s accounting just doesn’t seem right.

No one forced Sandra to come to Georgetown. And now that she has, Sandra does not have to depend on the university health plan. She could walk down the street to CVS and get some contraception herself. Or, go to an off-campus, non-university doctor and pay for it out of pocket. (Or, you know…maybe not have so much sex that it puts her in financial peril?)

Funny how the same side that cries “Get your rosaries off my ovaries” is the same side saying, “on second thought…please pay for me to have all the sex I want!” The people who espouse “pro-choice” “values” are the same people who say religious institutions have no right to choose.

Imagine if someone else had asked the government to cover a different activity. Let’s say I want to go rock climbing. It’s my body and my choice and I want to climb all the cliffs I can! Imagine if I went to the government and asked it to pay for helmets and ropes and band-aids I’ll need to safely climb rocks every day of my life. What would everyone say?

“It’s your choice to do that- no one’s forcing you to scale cliffs. So, either quit it or pay for it yourself!”

This is the reaction we should have had to Sandra Fluke.

Sandra, I hope you take to heart our school’s motto of “Cura Personalis” – care of the whole person. You are so much more than your reproductive organs. Please, have some self-respect and take responsibility for your choices instead of having to beg the government for help. The government should not be able to force a religious institution – like the one we attend – to pay for the things they don’t believe in. That is pretty clear in the first amendment. But since you missed the ten commandments I can’t expect you to read the Bill of Rights either.

I believe in Georgetown. I love this school. And I know that we are so, so much better than what Sandra Fluke would make us out to be.

Hoya Saxa.

Angela Morabito :: Georgetown University :: Washington, DC

Read More: http://thecollegeconservative.com/2012/03/02/sandr...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~ 2012/03/09 09:56:39
    iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~
    This kind of shows the problem with looking at the mandate as an assault on religious liberty.

    Georgetown is a private institution that really in no way caters to a Jesuit population. It pretty much has a student body like other good schools. The fact that it is affiliated with the Jesuits is important to its history and ideals, but in no way does the school function as a religious institution. It's a university. And it's population is diverse.

    The fact that Fluke attends the school and seems so horribly anti-Jesuit (according to the author) provides evidence that it's just a school. So here's the rub: if the Jesuits want to accept students who are diametrically opposed to them on certain ideological issue...and take their money for tuition, it seems hypocritical that the same institution get special objections because of those beliefs. These businesses reap the benefits of hiring a diverse group of professionals and workers, receiving funds from a diverse group of students...but insurance for contraceptives is an issue somehow?
  • Robert Morgan 2012/03/04 10:12:55
    Robert Morgan
    +1
    The first lawyer-esq question I had in response to Fluke's testimony would be this: Why stop at women when covering contraceptives? Do men not have an equal right to affordable options? Should my insurance company reimburse me if I send them a receipt for a box of condoms every week? If no to these questions, then my follow-up would be "Why don't you support equal reproductive rights for ALL citizens, rather than just women? Would that not, in itself, be an example of the very sexism and discrimination you are claiming to be a victim of?
    I am not a lawyer, and by the fact that these questions came to my untrained mind, I'd expect them to be planned for by a legal mind, such as a graduate law student like Fluke. Her argument would most likely fail in any undergrad college logic course.
  • RJ~PWCM... Robert ... 2012/03/05 03:26:12
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Good point. The Democrat party shielded her from questions by staging the phony Democrat-only Campaign Hearing, rather than a real hearing.
  • Longbow 2012/03/03 21:45:29
    Longbow
    +1
    Sandra Fluke is now a headline. Sharp move except she succeeded by debasing herself and arousing Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein all whom I believe have no further opportunity for sex. Heaven help her parents the FLUKES
  • Longbow 2012/03/03 21:38:24
    Longbow
    +1
    If Ms Fluke ever finds the time to study instead of you know what-ing she might by some miracle obtain her law degree and pass the Bar (between assignations). She may then become the most popular junior lawyer in town expert at you know what.
  • jtjustice 2012/03/03 06:26:34
    jtjustice
    +1
    fluke is a slut who found a whore in congress to support the power grab desired by the socialist swine...watch the tapes on this slut as she winks at mama whore...
  • RJ~PWCM... jtjustice 2012/03/03 12:36:17
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Well, I'm not sure that calling her a "slut" was the best idea. She is certainly a political activist on this issue, specifically brought in to deliver a prepared statement.

    And did you read it? It's disgusting, the way she fawns over Pelosi and the Dems in the first couple of paragraphs. Barf!
  • Navajogirl 2012/03/03 04:34:45
    Navajogirl
    +3
    Bravo!! I love this student post.
  • Ukie 2012/03/03 02:10:23
    Ukie
    +1
    Good for you!!!!
  • Jimbo 2012/03/03 01:33:08
    Jimbo
    Great country America, people can have different opinions everywhere. Proud to say women are smarter than men (HS, college grad rates) and support Sandra more than her detractor.
  • Robert ... Jimbo 2012/03/04 10:21:08
    Robert Morgan
    +1
    So, according to equality of reproductive rights, you are comfortable with my insurer (and by extension, yours) buying me $1k/year worth of condoms? I mean, all Men have reproductive health needs, and you need to respect that.

    (As an aside, there is something I can't figure out in Fluke's story: if you can't even afford contraceptives, how can you afford all the costs associated with getting laid? If you're too destitute to even afford gasoline, you're not shopping for a car...)
  • RJ~PWCM... Robert ... 2012/03/05 03:26:47
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    That's an intelligent question. But you'll never get an intelligent answer from this one.
  • paulyman 2012/03/03 01:30:36
    paulyman
    Sandra Fluke, funny name hahaha
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/02 23:31:35
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Good for you!
  • MW121 2012/03/02 22:50:21
    MW121
    +3
    It's amazing how people think everything this free.. I'm so sick of having to pay more and more in taxes just to cover so called "FREE" ... Nothing is free..
  • Idiot r... MW121 2012/03/03 01:09:00
    Idiot repubs
    +1
    If you pay for health insurance and perscription coverage it should be comprehensive.
  • MW121 Idiot r... 2012/03/03 03:48:45
    MW121
    Agreed, but thats not free... this girl is saying it should be free...
  • RJ~PWCM... Idiot r... 2012/03/03 12:37:20
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Why? There should be a choice of plans, some that cover more, some that cover less, so that people aren't forced to pay a higher premium for a plan that covers things they'll never ever need.
  • santanasmooth 2012/03/02 22:48:18
    santanasmooth
    +2
    What a self righteous little witch
  • RJ~PWCM... santana... 2012/03/02 22:52:05
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    OMG, OMG!!!! Ring the woman-hater alarm!!!!!!!!!!
  • santana... RJ~PWCM... 2012/03/02 22:54:26
    santanasmooth
    +1
    Why do you hate woman? You want to limit their choice , you want to protect the child molesting church instead of woman's rights . Ya i know your a woman hater but you don't have to be so obvious about it.
  • RJ~PWCM... santana... 2012/03/02 22:55:31
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    OMG, it was a JOKE!

    Why don't libs have any sense of humor?
  • Jimbo RJ~PWCM... 2012/03/03 01:31:06
  • Defend ... Jimbo 2012/03/03 03:06:51
    Defend Western Civlization
    +1
    How are women who do not want pay for this womens desires trying to stop women's rights?
    its not a right for you get free birth control and will not fund it so get over it
  • RJ~PWCM... Defend ... 2012/03/03 03:30:50
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    You make a very good point.

    But you're wasting it on a vegetable!
  • Space Invader 2012/03/02 22:35:32
    Space Invader
    +1
    great article.......Fluke;Hmm..what an appropriate name....
  • Andrew 2012/03/02 21:56:03
    Andrew
    +2
    She has another claim to fame! She is so sexually active, she used all the free contraceptives within driving distance of Georgetown University and now her only hope is if the Catholic Church pays for it! Otherwise, she might have to put her knees back together until the Health Department restocks!
  • Dee 2012/03/02 21:35:42
    Dee
    +1
    Sandra Fluke says her birth control costs her $3,000 over her college years which her insurance at a Catholic University doesn't cover. What type of birth control does this young lady (I use the term loosely because a lady would never stand in front of the Nation and proclaim she has so much sex she needs someone else to pay for the contraception) use? Is she not aware that the Department of Health in Washington, DC will send her FREE condoms?
  • RJ~PWCM... Dee 2012/03/02 21:38:03
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    The whole thing was a campaign stunt stage-managed by Pelosi and the Democrat party.

    Sandra Fluke isn't a stupid woman, but accepting her testimony at face value requires, as Hillary Clinton put it, the "willing suspension of disbelief".


    (OT - Yeah. It was just peachy keen for Clinton to call a General a liar to his face. And did she apologize to him later on when events proved that his testimony regarding the surge was 100% accurate, and she didn't know her ass from her elbow? Of course not.)
  • Dee RJ~PWCM... 2012/03/02 22:00:23
    Dee
    +2
    You are correct. I caught a little bit of a news report that she had specifically researched the insurance coverage at different universities and settled on Georgetown for the quality of education and not the medical coverage. But, now she's complaining??

    It seems to me that for what these ladies are paying for a Saturday night out would cover their pills or condoms. My insurance never paid for the pill way back in the day when I was making $75.00 a week and I managed. You just have get your priorities straight - newest electronic gadget or contraception..... smart phone or contraceptives.... alcohol or contraception.
  • AdLib 2012/03/02 21:17:00
    AdLib
    +1
    She speaks for me, as well as, millions of other American women.

    RJ, when would she speak for you? Do you take oral contraceptives? When was your last visit to a OBGYN? (just curious)
  • Stix AdLib 2012/03/02 21:31:26
    Stix
    +2
    Why should I have to pay for your birth control?
  • AdLib Stix 2012/03/02 21:33:59
    AdLib
    +1
    And, why should I have to pay for your Viagra?
  • Stix AdLib 2012/03/02 23:36:03
    Stix
    +3
    You don't, I don't need it or use it. And even if I did, up until ObamaCare, I had a very specific policy for men only through Group Health that cover male issues only...my rate was $270 per month with a $3,500 anual deductable....now because of ObamaCare and all the female stuff they have had to include by government mandates it now costs me $411 (just 2 years latter) and have raised my anual deductable to $6,500....the $3,500 deductable would cost me over $700 a month...all because of ObamaCare.
  • RJ~PWCM... Stix 2012/03/02 23:55:21
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Yeah, exactly.

    So many libs say "She's just asking for it to be covered, not for everyone else to pay for it".

    They have no clue how insurance works. Adding things to the coverage means exactly that everyone else will pay for it through higher premiums!
  • Georgia50 Stix 2012/03/03 01:27:15
    Georgia50
    +2
    As an Illinois elected official, Obama supported the law that forced auto insurance companies to pay for DUI injuries caused by their own customer. I wonder how the motorists of Illinois like having that little premium added to their policies.
  • danila777 Stix 2012/03/03 01:53:39
    danila777
    +1
    you're right, Group Health used to have such wonderful rates but now everything cost double and the copay is $30 per visit. I've been with them for 22 years and I still think they're better than everyone else out there. As for birth control I asked my doctor to recomend a brand and buy it myself. I do not see the big deal, you can make do without a night out or a few less frappucinos, these people do not wat any personal responsibilities.
  • AdLib danila777 2012/03/03 16:24:32
    AdLib
    Actually, no he is not.

    "Insurers won't be able to get away with hiking up the prices much longer. The several pieces of health reform that will bring prices down haven't been fully implemented yet and until they are, several insurers are raising premiums as much as they dare and earned record profits as a result."

    Women of all economic levels want to remain "responsible" by being allowed access to affordable health care. It means, taking responsibility for unwanted pregnancies, hence lowering abortion rates, planning when they choose to start a family and having access to prescription drugs that will help with certain medical issues. As a woman, I find it unconscionable that you do not support your own gender in this issue.
  • danila777 AdLib 2012/03/04 04:47:55
    danila777
    +1
    You can debate this issue as much as you want, and I will not change my views and my ideas. Call me whatever you want but I do not agree with the girls that have multiple sex partners, I was in college too and I saw what was going on and I still do not agree. As for abortion I think that the woman should put the child up for adoption, but that is just my point of view, birth control should be between a woman and her husband or doctor not a countrywide issue.
  • AdLib Stix 2012/03/03 16:02:32
    AdLib
    Its no wonder why republicans vote against their own self interest when you only listen to right-wing talking heads and not do the research on your own.

    Insurers won't be able to get away with hiking up the prices much longer. The several pieces of health reform that will bring prices down haven't been fully implemented yet and until they are, several insurers are raising premiums as much as they dare and earned record profits as a result.

    This past Sept 1st insurance companies that want to raise prices more than 10% have to do so by announcing it in public. Not only that they will have to give details on a standardized consumer friendly form anyone can read at Healthcare.org.

    If you want to see how bad insurance companies are gouging the public, look at what Atena has done in raising its prices, before Affordable Health Care has taken affect. So, if you want to continue to let insurance companies raise prices, then go ahead and remain ill-informed and vote against your own self interest.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 03:15:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals