Four new States join Georgia in challenging Obama's eligibility for the Ballot and one of them is ...
KCurtis
2012/01/28 01:21:46
|
|
|||||
|
920 votes
|
|
91% | ||
|
91 votes
|
|
9% | ||
Illinois...
...and Official Challenges have been filed in Alabama, Massachusetts, and Tennessee. Finally the word JUSTICE is ringing true to the American people.
Numerous Organizations are popping up to support the Laws under the Constitution and put a stop to the theft of the highest office of the United States of America. Freedom Nations is one who advocates a petition to support the Eligibility Requirements be mandatory in every state https://secure.freedomdonations.com/proofpositive/demand_proo...
But the biggest news is that one of the states seeking justice and proof of eligibility, beyond Nancy Pelosi's certification is ILLINOIS. A State that knows too well Obama's lack of accomplishments since he served as an Illinois Senator but the majority of his service was cloaked with Present votes. A vote to record one's presence in the senate, but abstinence of any real stance.
Hilary Clinton called the record correctly when she said, "In the Illinois State Senate, Senator Obama voted 130 times 'present,'"
Clinton said. "That's not 'yes.' That's not 'no.' That's 'maybe.'"
This week, Retired ASAR LTC William F. Reade filed an official ballot challenge with election officials, contending that Barack Obama is ineligible to appear on the Massachusetts ballot. Reade’s challenge is well researched and filled with numerous legal citations to back his case.
But perhaps most interesting are the similarities between LTC Reade’s and
Barack Obama’s citizenship status. Like Obama, Reade was born in the United
States. But, also like Obama whose father was a Kenyan citizen and therefore a
British subject, Reade’s father was also a British subject. As such, Reade
correctly points out that he himself is not a “natural born citizen” as defined
by the Supreme Court and therefore, like Barack Obama, Reade is also ineligible
for the office of President.
Commentary: So the Liberals and Progressives can call the race card, stomp their feet and scream foul all they want the facts are facts. Obama has not been proven eligible under US law and unless he does so his HOPE is fading. He and his highly paid legal eagles failure to appear in court and failure to produce an unquestionable paper document proving his citizenship are still yet to be found. 3 years is a long time to hide Obama, we're coming.
Best,
The Tea Party
Should Obama be removed from the Ballot?
...and Official Challenges have been filed in Alabama, Massachusetts, and Tennessee. Finally the word JUSTICE is ringing true to the American people.
Numerous Organizations are popping up to support the Laws under the Constitution and put a stop to the theft of the highest office of the United States of America. Freedom Nations is one who advocates a petition to support the Eligibility Requirements be mandatory in every state https://secure.freedomdonations.com/proofpositive/demand_proo...
But the biggest news is that one of the states seeking justice and proof of eligibility, beyond Nancy Pelosi's certification is ILLINOIS. A State that knows too well Obama's lack of accomplishments since he served as an Illinois Senator but the majority of his service was cloaked with Present votes. A vote to record one's presence in the senate, but abstinence of any real stance.
Hilary Clinton called the record correctly when she said, "In the Illinois State Senate, Senator Obama voted 130 times 'present,'"
Clinton said. "That's not 'yes.' That's not 'no.' That's 'maybe.'"
This week, Retired ASAR LTC William F. Reade filed an official ballot challenge with election officials, contending that Barack Obama is ineligible to appear on the Massachusetts ballot. Reade’s challenge is well researched and filled with numerous legal citations to back his case.
But perhaps most interesting are the similarities between LTC Reade’s and
Barack Obama’s citizenship status. Like Obama, Reade was born in the United
States. But, also like Obama whose father was a Kenyan citizen and therefore a
British subject, Reade’s father was also a British subject. As such, Reade
correctly points out that he himself is not a “natural born citizen” as defined
by the Supreme Court and therefore, like Barack Obama, Reade is also ineligible
for the office of President.
Commentary: So the Liberals and Progressives can call the race card, stomp their feet and scream foul all they want the facts are facts. Obama has not been proven eligible under US law and unless he does so his HOPE is fading. He and his highly paid legal eagles failure to appear in court and failure to produce an unquestionable paper document proving his citizenship are still yet to be found. 3 years is a long time to hide Obama, we're coming.
Best,
The Tea Party
Should Obama be removed from the Ballot?
Read More: http://www.teapartypac.org/2012/01/27/four-new-sta...
Top Opinion
-
bman~AVA 2012/01/28 01:59:48Obama is a Fraud and should be removed from all US Ballots
+27Very good post my friend. I'm just real surprised the commie country of Illinois is one of them. I live here and I've seen how corrupt this state is. For crying out loud, 4 of our last 7 Governors ended up in prison. How many other states have that particular distinction? Now with that being stated if Illinois is pushing for this then you know it's serious! It's about time(no scratch that it's well past time) this train started rolling down the tracks
We're talking about HIGH TREASON here. That means Obama, Eric Holder and more are ALL guilty. What will that do to our Country? Obozo has been nothing but BAD for the United States!
1. No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
2. (The Congress) To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
3. The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequ...
1. No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
2. (The Congress) To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
3. The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
4. The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that [Law of Nations]. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. The words "all children" are certainly as comprehensive, when used in this connection, as "all persons," and if females are included in the last they must be in the first. That they are included in the last is not denied. In fact the whole argument of the plaintiffs proceeds upon that idea.
born in Hawaii to one citizen parent and one student visiting on a visa therefore a citizen but not a natural born citizen which is a requirement for being the President ... did you not read and understand ... there is no where else to find the answers ... everything relevant to Constitutional eligibility is in my post above ... thats it ... nothing else matters ... if you read those four paragraphs and still believe that Obama is Constitutionally eligible then there is no helping you ... you will believe what you want regardless of the facts right in your face ... these people talking about the 14th amendment make no sense ... the natural born citizen clause for the eligibility of the president is found in the Constitution ... do you really believe that they knew they were going to amend the Constitution? If you believe that they knew (they didn't) then why did they wait until the 14th amendment to define it? (they didn't) ... either you support the Constitution or it doesn't matter to you ... if you support it than there is only way of looking at it ... if you dont care about the Constitution that is one thing but you will at least know to stop arguing just because he is "your guy" and just say i don't care bout the Constitution I just care that the great and wonderful Obama can lead me ... a whole lot of incense and bells ringing … the Constitution is quite clear ... and you believe that it took until the 14th amendment for them to define a natural born citizen ... when the path is provided in the Constitution ... I have provided above everything in the Constitution that is needed to decipher eligibility and only a fool (victim of a trick) will continue arguing that it didn't happen until the 14th amendment ... (14th amendment allowed slaves to become citizens and without the end of slavery there would have been no 14th amendment but keep believing your 14th amendment is where constitutional eligibility comes from) use your brain folks ...
The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The Congressional Research Service has stated that the weight of scholarly legal and historical opinion indicates that the term means one who is entitled under the Constitution or laws of the United States to U.S. citizenship "at birth" or "by birth," including any child born "in" the United States (other than to foreign diplomats serving their country), the children of United States citizens born abroad, and those born abroad of one citizen parent who has met U.S. residency requirements.[1]
The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts dealing with the question of eligibility for citizenship by birth, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen
If the Constitution/SCOTUS hasn't defined it seems like its irrelevant...
Natural born citizen is not defined in the Constitution he was born in Hawaii and qualifies. You're the one with nothing left. The debate is over and done with except for birther nutz..
So they resort to this. Claiming this is about the Constitution when they know damn well this is about race. Nothing more, Nothing less.
If I had to endure 8 years of Bush, then I’m not really concerned with the legitimacy of President Obama’s citizenship. Bush was one of the dumbest presidents we’ve had to endure. I didn’t vote for him. People are getting jobs, Osama is dead, our troops are home, and the economy is getting better. I could careless about his citizenship. If Mr. Malihi wants to vote someone else in office, he’s free to cast his vote like everybody else. The disrespect of OUR President is getting ridiculous.
If you hate being called racists, Stop beating this dead horse and admit it!
Anyone who calls Obama a fraud is a racist!
I said 4 yrs ago that Obama wasn't qualified to lead a Cub Scout troop to a camp ground on a paved road with a map and a tour guide. Nothing to do with Color or Race (by the way, he still claims on occasion that he is 1/2 white).
With the drastic increase of the debt at Oscama's EXPRESS request, you can't honestly believe that Oscama is qualified to lead this nation.
Foreign affairs - LOSER
Military Operations and Defense Policy - LOSER, the Military is carrying his water.
Immigration - LOSER, fails to follow federal statute.
Domestic Affairs - LOSER, he's at war with the PEOPLE, dividing them racially, economically, social class and trampling on the Constitution....
forward this as received, but without comment.
DO NOT ADD A SINGLE WORD
Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening.
The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised "Meet The Press'.
From Sunday's 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised "Meet the Press" THE THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.
General Bill Ginn' USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171...
During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".
NOW GET THIS !!
...
forward this as received, but without comment.
DO NOT ADD A SINGLE WORD
Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening.
The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised "Meet The Press'.
From Sunday's 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised "Meet the Press" THE THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.
General Bill Ginn' USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171...
During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".
NOW GET THIS !!
'Senator'Obama replied:
"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides". "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression.." "The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing."
(ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???)
Obama continued: "The National Anthem should be 'swapped' for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing'. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as 'redesign' our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It's my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of waring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ......"
When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past".
"Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path..My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country's First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America "
WHAAAAAAAT, the Hell is that???
Yes, you read it right.
I, for one, am speechless!!!
Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post
EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NEEDS
TO READ THIS, KEEP IT GOING ! !
SAVE AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE ! !
Jay Bookman of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution wrote this about Secretary of State Brian Kemp, and just how he'll proceed with a ruling, if indeed he does proceed. He has 60 days to do so.
"At any rate, the final decision is Kemp's. Regardless of what Malihi recommends, Kemp does not want to become the Republican secretary of state who ruled Barack Obama off the ballot in Georgia. Becoming a birther hero would not begin to compensate for the lasting infamy such a step would bring him, especially because such a ruling would be challenged in state or federal court and almost immediately overturned on any number of reasons. Kemp would then look like a fool and put an end to any further political ambitions he might have. I doubt that’s the course he will choose to take."—Jay Bookman
In the end, no groundbreaking arguments, testimony or evidence were presented at Thursday's hearing, perhaps a testament to the tired nature of these challenges. Taitz is one of the most seasoned veterans of the birther movement, and the fact that she was even granted a hearing came as her first "victory." She was fined $20,000 last year by a Georgia judge for filing frivolous lawsuits of the same nature.
Since Obama has shown proof of his citizenship, several times, is it any wonder why he and others didn't show up in Georgia? Why waste everyone's time?
You might as well face it...Obama will be re-elected in November, and will be around for another 4-year term.