Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed
|
|
|||||
|
6 votes
|
|
55% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
45% | |||
July 10, 2009
Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens.
The
tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person
now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?
These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren,
whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for
Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of
Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United
States’ Science Czar. I In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs
intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from
them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables)
“can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in
other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global
economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives —
using an armed international police force.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things.
Well,
I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration.
John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the
proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of
pages in the book Ecoscience,
co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul
Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply
conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered
and accurately transcribed.
UPDATE:
Make sure to read the new statements issued by the White House and by
John Holdren’s office in response to the controversy raised by this
essay — you can see them below following the Ecoscience excerpts, or you
can jump directly to the statements by clicking here.]
This report was originally inspired by this article
in FrontPage magazine, which covers some of the same information given
here. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from
John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. Why
not? Because, as I discovered when discussing the article with various
friends, there was no proof that the quotes were accurate — so most
folks (even those opposed to Obama’s policies) doubted their veracity,
because the statements seemed too inflammatory to be true. In the modern
era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are
presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to
back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence.
Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he
co-authored about what he imagined at the time (late 1970s) was an
apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: overpopulation. He felt extreme
measures would be required to combat an extreme problem. Whether or not
you think this provides him a valid “excuse” for having descended into a
totalitarian fantasy is up to you: personally, I don’t think it’s a
valid excuse at all, since the crisis he was in a panic over was mostly
in his imagination. Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost
always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for
actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible.
Direct quotes from John Holdren’s Ecoscience
Below
you will find a series of ten short passages from Ecoscience. On the
left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of
the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage,
with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short
analysis by me
Following
these short quotes, I take a “step back” and provide the full extended
passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to
provide the full context
And
at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans (and photos) of
the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash
any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to
forestall any claims that the quotes were taken “out of context.”
Read More: http://www.governmenttyranny.com/obamas-science-cz...
Top Opinion
-
i think+3they have been getting mind control for abortion over years sense they couldnt do it that way abortion was legalized.























Sterilization and abortions could have long-term harmful effects on the genetics of the current and future generations by altering the structure or preventing the production of DNA. I predict that the human race will become less diverse and heavily controlled if this continues (Eugenics is also a very serious possibility, although it is unfair to the natural order of things as well as to human rights (by denying you to option of reproducing for yourself)).
"It is high time, to accept as forever gone, the sparsely populated world of the past, and move on, in an orderly transition, to the populous world of the future." Pronatalist
"How can there be too many children? That's like saying there are too many flowers." Mother Teresa
There are quite many people remaining, who do not believe in using any means of "birth control," because it aims to hinder the natural spread of human life. What could be a more egregious violation of the most basic of human rights, than imposing population "control" upon people? We are not the New World Order criminal elitist's cattle playthings to experiment upon. Why are our religious beliefs and individual rights, not respected?
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a leading promoter of Eugenics and originally founded the organization with that Nazi-like purpose in mind. The feminists have played right into the hands of, and in some cases promote, this attack on women and the family claiming the opposite. The Government has made this so appetizing that it has made it anti-woman to believe otherwise--even though the research shows that a lot of these women are sterilizing themselves through abortion because the future chance of having "wanted" children are extremely low in women who have had abortions with fractionalizing the chances 4 to 5x with each subsequent abortion. Women aren't notified of these facts because the Government wants population low so it can be controled. If everyone were open to hea...
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a leading promoter of Eugenics and originally founded the organization with that Nazi-like purpose in mind. The feminists have played right into the hands of, and in some cases promote, this attack on women and the family claiming the opposite. The Government has made this so appetizing that it has made it anti-woman to believe otherwise--even though the research shows that a lot of these women are sterilizing themselves through abortion because the future chance of having "wanted" children are extremely low in women who have had abortions with fractionalizing the chances 4 to 5x with each subsequent abortion. Women aren't notified of these facts because the Government wants population low so it can be controled. If everyone were open to hearing all the facts on abortion, no one would be for it or allow it--even in the most extreme cases--because they would realize that it really is not a "choice", except to get many times closer, if not assuring, one's own voluntary sterilization.
probably not!