If unusually warm weather helped encourage job growth earlier this year, May was like a wet, cold rain. A report from the Labor Department on Friday showed that U.S. employers added just 69,000 jobs last month — far fewer than expected.
Hiring ground to a halt across different industries in many parts of the country. Republican White House-hopeful Mitt Romney seized on the report as fresh evidence to attack President Obama's handling of the economy. The disappointing numbers sent the Dow Jones industrial average plunging nearly 275 points.
"My sense is that it's fear," says Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics.
Zandi says would-be employers have been spooked by the sell-off in the stock market, the slowing growth in China and the European debt crisis that never seems to end.
"Business people are just very nervous. They've been through a lot. If anything goes off-script, they pull back. They stop hiring," he says.
The 69,000 jobs added in May represent the slowest pace of hiring in a year. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of new job-seekers started looking for work. That sent the unemployment rate up to 8.2 percent.
Talking Jobs On The Campaign Trail
The disappointing jobs report comes at a bad time for Obama, since these are the months that tend to shape voters' opinions about the economy as they prepare for the November election. Obama stressed Friday that the U.S. is still adding jobs — just not quickly enough.
"We knew there would be ups and downs along the way," he said. "But we also knew if we were willing to act wisely and boldly, and if we were acting together as Americans ... and never quit, then we wouldn't just come back. We'd come back stronger than ever."
Romney argues the president has had three and a half years to turn the economy around. Speaking on CNBC Friday, Romney said the U.S. should be well into a robust recovery by now.
"Their policies have not worked, and in many respects their policies have made it harder for the economy to recover," he said. "I think that's one of the reasons why people are looking for a new direction."
Obama loyalists argue the struggling job market is less an indictment of the president's policies than the failure by Congress to pass them.
Jared Bernstein, formerly Vice President Joe Biden's chief economist, says the president hasn't been able to get much through Congress in the last year and a half, ever since Republicans took control of the House.
"The president has been pushing for policies which — if they were in place — the job market wouldn't be doing as badly as it is," he says.
For example, Obama has called for more federal spending on public works projects and local government, which might have prevented last month's loss of 28,000 construction jobs and 13,000 government jobs. But Congress never approved that spending.
Bernstein, who's now a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, says lawmakers have added their own measure of uncertainty with their refusal to compromise on taxes, spending targets and the debt ceiling.
"I think the political gridlock, or dysfunction, if you will, has made things even worse. Now we're talking about going over this fiscal cliff and having another debt ceiling fight," he says. "That's obviously exactly the wrong medicine for the current economy. So it's not just that Congress isn't helping — it's that they're actively hurting."
What It Means For Obama
Obama renewed his call for congressional action on the jobs front Friday. And his re-election campaign has been busy criticizing Romney's record on job creation when he was governor of Massachusetts.
Still, Nathan Gonzales, deputy editor of The Rothenberg Political Report, says history suggests it's Obama who will be held accountable for the economy if things don't improve between now and November.
"Voters just want to feel like the country and the economy are headed in the right direction," he says. "And I don't know if enough voters believe that right now to help the president win a second term."
At this point, there aren't many months left to change their minds.
http://www.npr.org/2012/06/02/154191028/analysts-smell-fear-a...http://www.npr.org/2012/06/02/154191028/analysts-smell-fear-a...
[Obama stressed Friday that the U.S. is still adding jobs — just not quickly enough.
"We knew there would be ups and downs along the way," he said. "But we also knew if we were willing to act wisely and boldly, and if we were acting together as Americans ... and never quit, then we wouldn't just come back. We'd come back stronger than ever."]
Who writes this crap? This is the same worn out lines we've been fed since the "Recovery Summer 2009" was touted, which never happened and all in his head.
Unemployment shot up to 10.2% while he flew around the U.S trying to sell 0bozocare, destroying perfectly good vehicles, (that could have been used by many) stifling growth in the private sector while increasing the Federal govt. workforce.
He laughed about the so-called shovel-ready jobs that weren't so shovel ready after all, and now is talking about more spending for public works projects that don't do a thing to grow the economy. Very "FDR" of him to return to the failed policies of the past. Who cares if all the street signs are uniform in capital letters across the nation?
Nearly $1Trillion in wasted stimulus (unless you ask those in line for paybacks) that should have gone towards repairing and upgrading our failing power grids, utility lines, leaky aquedu...&
[Obama stressed Friday that the U.S. is still adding jobs — just not quickly enough.
"We knew there would be ups and downs along the way," he said. "But we also knew if we were willing to act wisely and boldly, and if we were acting together as Americans ... and never quit, then we wouldn't just come back. We'd come back stronger than ever."]
Who writes this crap? This is the same worn out lines we've been fed since the "Recovery Summer 2009" was touted, which never happened and all in his head.
Unemployment shot up to 10.2% while he flew around the U.S trying to sell 0bozocare, destroying perfectly good vehicles, (that could have been used by many) stifling growth in the private sector while increasing the Federal govt. workforce.
He laughed about the so-called shovel-ready jobs that weren't so shovel ready after all, and now is talking about more spending for public works projects that don't do a thing to grow the economy. Very "FDR" of him to return to the failed policies of the past. Who cares if all the street signs are uniform in capital letters across the nation?
Nearly $1Trillion in wasted stimulus (unless you ask those in line for paybacks) that should have gone towards repairing and upgrading our failing power grids, utility lines, leaky aqueducts, necessary bridges, and perhaps 10,000 low cost walk-in clinics around the U.S., staffed and operated by private, local doctors & nurses to alleviate the load on hospital emergency rooms.
Instead, it was wasted on new runways at airports, few use, additional bridges where perfectly usable ones existed, turtle tunnels, fences around dry lakes, fish ladders, subsidies for really fast choo-choos, and the dozens of green energy pipe dreams that continue to go bankrupt.
He ran out of ideas long ago, and now he's out of excuses.
Both parties supported those bills with the exception of a few.
There were round-about figures as to how much would be divided up through various departments but no mention in the bill as to where exactly the dollars were headed and for what.
It basically opened dozens checking accounts with stacks of blanks checks.
A very few number of programs were mentioned in broad detail, like Cash 4 Clunkers.
Initially, $1Billion was supposed to go from monies the DOT was given to play with but the fund went bust within a few weeks and there was a Congressional battle over adding another $2Billion to the program
Eventually it was passed, costing Americans $4,500 for every vehicle destroyed.
I would suggest you go to a nonpartisan site and see how the money was actually spent.
Talk about do-overs?
If Congress knew then, what we know now, there's no way in Hades the bill would have ever made it through.
They didn't even have enough tome to read the thing. It was touted as a MUST DO and MUST DO NOW proposition.
A few months later, after people had a chance to dissect it, the news was out and Americans started calling and E-mailing Congress saying WTF? - over.....
Then came the first draft of 0bozocare.... HR3200 .... (we de...
There were round-about figures as to how much would be divided up through various departments but no mention in the bill as to where exactly the dollars were headed and for what.
It basically opened dozens checking accounts with stacks of blanks checks.
A very few number of programs were mentioned in broad detail, like Cash 4 Clunkers.
Initially, $1Billion was supposed to go from monies the DOT was given to play with but the fund went bust within a few weeks and there was a Congressional battle over adding another $2Billion to the program
Eventually it was passed, costing Americans $4,500 for every vehicle destroyed.
I would suggest you go to a nonpartisan site and see how the money was actually spent.
Talk about do-overs?
If Congress knew then, what we know now, there's no way in Hades the bill would have ever made it through.
They didn't even have enough tome to read the thing. It was touted as a MUST DO and MUST DO NOW proposition.
A few months later, after people had a chance to dissect it, the news was out and Americans started calling and E-mailing Congress saying WTF? - over.....
Then came the first draft of 0bozocare.... HR3200 .... (we designated volunteers online to concentrate on 20 pages only, each and report back) people got off their asses and showed up at the town-hall meetings.... and the TEA Party of 2009 was born.
So now you are telling me both sides are so stupid that they will vote in a vague piece of legislation/policies. Funny how Ron Paul didn't go for it when the rest of his party did; as I stated, you make excuses and garner no self accountability.
Yes, they were that totally ignorant not to demand the bill got a thorough examination before taking it up for a vote. Everyone was still caught up in the Hopey-Changey cloud of confusion and 0bozo was riding on a 65% approval rating. I blame every one of them for rushing a bill that large through without a single one reading it.
No, Ron Paul was FAR from the only one who opposed it.
The House introduced their version, on the 26th of January 2009. Two days later it was voted on 244-188. All R's voted no, along with 11 D's.
The Senate took it up on February 2nd, called a special session for debate on Sat. the 7th, voted to end debate on the 9th and took a final vote on the 10th ... 61-37 with only 3 R's voting yes.... the typical Collins, Snowe & Specter.
So.... bills that were written well before he usurped the office were signed - sealed and delivered.on February 17th and it was just a hint of the nightmare to come.
In order for the economy to improve and job creation to increase we must have tax reform and certainty, reduction of job killing regulations on business (do not read as 'no' regulations), cuts in all spending, toss out Obamacare and replace with reforms and common sense ways to assist the uninsured, shrink the size of government through reduction of all middle management and desolution of all duplication, reform SS, reform Medicare, and that is for starters.
Socialism was here before Obama stepped in office; The New Deal was Socialism.
Socialism was here before Obama with The New Deal, SS, Subsidies and the list goes on. Learn some history; in addition to Fascism being here before Obama came in office. Woodrow Wilson practice Fascism, so did FDR and others. SMH
Globalization moved the jobs to the cheapest place. Think you can buy gas for the car when your take home pay is $30 a week. We have college grads working the Starbucks counter.
The best first step to remediate this ongoing misery is tax reform , and Congress has no intention of doing so. One party's cheerleading about low jobs numbers is callous in the face of so much misery -- especially when the misery's likely to continue for years if more isn't done. The current political framework is incapable of enacting meaning policy changes. This is due to their inability to take responsibility for the disasters they have created. Both sides are guilty .....the degrees of whic...
Globalization moved the jobs to the cheapest place. Think you can buy gas for the car when your take home pay is $30 a week. We have college grads working the Starbucks counter.
The best first step to remediate this ongoing misery is tax reform , and Congress has no intention of doing so. One party's cheerleading about low jobs numbers is callous in the face of so much misery -- especially when the misery's likely to continue for years if more isn't done. The current political framework is incapable of enacting meaning policy changes. This is due to their inability to take responsibility for the disasters they have created. Both sides are guilty .....the degrees of which are immaterial. Both have sold themselves as true representatives of their constituencies. Both are duplicitous prevaricators. We are ill-served by those we put our faith in. How do we change that?