Federalist or Democratic Republican?
Robo Toaster
2010/02/20 01:59:48
Imagine it's the 1700s. George Washington is the President. There are two major political parties, the Federalists, and the Democratic-Republicans. Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, is the head of the Federalist Party, and Thomas Jefferson, the Secretary of State, is the head of the Democratic-Republican Party.
The Federalist Party platform is strong government, establishment of a national bank, and a focus on industrialization. They supported the Constitution regardless of whether it had a bill of rights.
The Democratic-Republican Party platform advocates states rights, opposition to a national bank, and a focus on the farmer. They refused to ratify the Constitution unless it had a bill of rights.
So I ask you this question. Would you be a Federalist, Democratic-Republican, or have no party like Washington did?
The Federalist Party platform is strong government, establishment of a national bank, and a focus on industrialization. They supported the Constitution regardless of whether it had a bill of rights.
The Democratic-Republican Party platform advocates states rights, opposition to a national bank, and a focus on the farmer. They refused to ratify the Constitution unless it had a bill of rights.
So I ask you this question. Would you be a Federalist, Democratic-Republican, or have no party like Washington did?
Top Opinion
-
doofiegirl POTL~PWCM~JLA 2010/02/20 02:15:12Democratic Republican





















beyond that...Hamilton was regarded as a monarchist sympathizer, (one of those who wanted George Washington to be King) Aaron Burr may have done the nation a great service by shooting and killing him
Hamilton as Secretary of the Treasury started the Coast Guard to collect the tariffs of vessels coming into New York harbor. He made sure that the states that had spent so much financing troops in the war got reimbursed. Granted he succombed to the enticement of power and had problems. Had he have been landed aristocracy like most of the Founding Fathers he would have been more highly respected. In my mind he was truly a self made man and did it by the time he was in his late twenties.
As far as people go, Washington assisted the "Federalists" in making the Constitution dishonestly and with an illegal clause. At the same time, I was disappointed with Jefferson, because he went beyond the powers of the federal government in, I think it was, buying land.
Throughout his two terms, Washington insisted on his power to act independent of Congress in foreign conflicts, especially when war broke out between France and England in 1793 and he issued a Declaration of Neutrality on his own authority. He also acted decisively in putting down a rebellion by farmers in western Pennsylvania who protested a federal whiskey tax (the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794). After he left office, exhausted and discouraged over the ...
Throughout his two terms, Washington insisted on his power to act independent of Congress in foreign conflicts, especially when war broke out between France and England in 1793 and he issued a Declaration of Neutrality on his own authority. He also acted decisively in putting down a rebellion by farmers in western Pennsylvania who protested a federal whiskey tax (the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794). After he left office, exhausted and discouraged over the rise of political factions, Washington returned to Mount Vernon, where he died almost three years later.
Historians agree that no one other than George Washington could have held the disparate colonies and, later, the struggling young Republic together. To the Revolution's last day, Washington's troops were ragged, starving, and their pay was months in arrears. In guiding this force during year after year of humiliating defeat to final victory, more than once paying his men out of his own pocket to keep them from going home, Washington earned the unlimited confidence of those early citizens of the United States. Perhaps most importantly, Washington's balanced and devoted service as President persuaded the American people that their prosperity and best hope for the future lay in a union under a strong but cautious central authority. His refusal to accept a proffered crown and his willingness to relinquish the office after two terms established the precedents for limits on the power of the presidency. Washington's profound achievements built the foundations of a powerful national government that has survived for more than two centuries.
{{{Hug}}}
I want my Country back. I will get too it and all the wondrous articles being posted in group. I really love how the group is shaping up.
The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments. ~ George Washington
I really believe the two-party system we have today places the focus on the party. This focus of what is best for the party and has caused people to pick one side and distrust the other.
Yet, I can honestly say that a one-party system would probably not work today. It would take someone far smarter than I to figure that one out. Washington put his country and his countrymen above the pettiness of both Hamilton and Jefferson and least that's what I see ... but nothing is written in stone and I live to learn which is why I wouldn't make a good politician either. :-)