Quantcast

Fascism & Right-Wing Ideology And Ignorance: So You Hate Unions And Love Corporations Huh?

riceroni ~ POTC**FUKU2** 2011/02/26 12:15:06
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Anyone educated to the level of that becoming a
kindergartener know that corporations have an invested interest in hating
unions. But what makes a person that benefits or would from union membership
actually hate the union and side with the corporation who have no stake in them
being empowered in any form or fashion. For the working person this formula is
a simple one where the welfare of the worker is concerned….

Union = Empower
Corporation = Oppress

Is it some sort of Stockholm syndrome? Or maybe
it’s just wanton stupidity and willful ignorance. Whatever the case, they
willingly accept the fact that the corporation do not care about them, their
safety, their welfare, or that of their families. They don’t mind being treated
as expendable pieces of scrap, and once your usefulness is extracted you’re
discarded like the garbage they’ve always treated you like. The union is simply
making sure that while the corporation is leaching every drop of your
usefulness that you’re at least getting a fair deal and treatment for it.
Because anyone with a fully functional brain knows that what the corporation
get out of the worker as oppose to what the working put into the corporation is
as lopsided and Rush Limbaugh and Stephanie Miller sharing a see-saw.




Corporate Goal



Devour as much profit as
possible at anyone’s expense! That’s it, it’s that simple. A corporation’s loyalty
is only to profits and its shareholders and the rest be damned. The concerns of
you and yours matter not to the corporation. Maximum profits coming in, and
minimum expenditures going out. This will be fulfilled by any means necessary.



The Corporate Person



When we speak of the constitution and its intent
there are some things that only sheer greed will allow you to pursue. When the
14th amendment was passed this was done so to protect newly freed
slaves, not to make a corporation a person. Over 600,000 people died to give
people rights, not to give Proctor & Gamble personhood. But under corporate
lobby judges took the rights reserved for people and applied them to capital
and property while actually stripping them from people.



So let’s ask ourselves just what kind of “person”
is the corporation? Let’s give the corporation a personality diagnosis….



Callous unconcern
for the feelings of others. (i.e. thwart destitution, unsafe work conditions,
slash of benefits and wages)





In Incapacity to maintain
enduring relationships. (i.e. impoverishing through free trade, layoffs, and
union busting)





3. Reckless disregard
for the safety of others. (i.e. dangerous products, chemicals, pollutions, toxic
waste, and synthetic chemicals)







4 Deceitfulness:
Repeated lying and conning for profit. (i.e. habitat destruction, factory
farming, and experimentation)





5. Incapacity to
experience guilt. (i.e. Monsanto case)







6. Failure to conform
to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors. (i.e. CO2 emissions, nuclear
waste, clear-cuts, corporate paradigm)



If you take all these
personality traits and put them together you have the personality diagnosis
disorder of a psychopath. No wonder conservatives love them.



Here are some atrocities that corporations are
guilty of….



Corporations helped rebuild Germany after the 1st
world war, and supported early Nazi rise to power, and backed Hitler in getting
rid of left-wing elements that posed threats. For instance, IBM leased their
punch-card systems to Nazi death camps. This is how they were able to process
and keep up with prisoners.



Or how about Bechtel
Corporation actually privatizing the water of the country of Bolivia, and
teaming up with its tyrannical regime against the people of Cochabamba. Yes,
right down to the rain water that fell from the sky Bechtel was charging
obscene amounts for it.

Corporation’s allegiance to profits trumps that
of allegiance to any flag. There have been over 80 American corporations fined
for trading and doing business with known enemies of the United States of
America including terrorists, tyrants, and rogue regimes. I'd really like to know how the Hell is it that corporations have every benefit of being a person, but have to adhere to none of the the responsibility? C’mon you America
loving conservatives who feel you have the patented rights to the flag, please
name the union that have ever committed these acts of treason.



Lastly but definitely not least, their plan is to
degrade America from democracy to despotism. Back in the early 19th
century corporations hired a proven battle hardened USMC General by the name of
Smedley Darlington Butler to use despotism as a tool to secure foreign markets and
maximize profits (i.e. Pacified Mexico for American oil companies, Haiti and
Cuba for National Citibank, Nicaragua for the Brown Brothers Brokerage, the
Dominican Republic for its sugar interest, Honduras for U.S. fruit companies,
and China for Standard Oil). General Butler’s services were in demand in the
United States as well. You see, in the 1930’s as FDR sought to relieve the misery
of the depression though public enterprise and tougher regulations on corporate
exploitation and its deeds.



While the American people were with President FDR
the corporate elite couldn’t hate the new deal more. So in 1934 they sought to
involve General Butler in a treasonous cope d’état against the FDR White House.
Little did the heads of the corporate elite know they picked the wrong guy.
General Butler was fed up with being a gangster for capitalism. As a USMC he
felt that his loyalty to country and the President of the United States trumped
any amount of money in the world. Thus foiling the plan which included some of
the heads of America’s top corporations such J.P. Morgan, DuPont, and Goodyear
Tire.







I ask you again, please name the union that have
committed such treasonous act against America?




http://econotrix.com/archives/000264.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-papantonio/psychopathic-co...

http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm

http://www2.csusm.edu/pan/Scrapbook%20Articles/us_companies.htm





Read More: http://www.thecorporation.com/

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Che Guevara - Hero 2011/02/26 13:03:05
    Che Guevara - Hero
    +12
    Its unbelievable that there are so many people that support the corporations that exploit labor by paying them as little as possible in wages and benefits and take that extra profit and put it in the pockets of stockholders.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Giantfan 2011/03/02 18:17:44
    Giantfan
    They don't need 500,000 men doing that today. They have the republican party in the federal and states houses and senates already taking over the government for corporate America. Also state governors and local mayors. It's bought and paid for already.
  • Brandon 2011/03/01 17:03:08
    Brandon
    It seems people waon't be happy until the U.S. caves in on itself.
  • aherbert 2011/02/28 23:00:53
    aherbert
    I just don't understand ....

    http://www.granitegrok.com/pi...
  • Atmara 2011/02/27 18:06:07
    Atmara
    +3
    Great post! I love it.
    Note to mikie56 cause I blocked his moronic ass:
    If we had a government that mandated a living wage, we might not need unions but need or no need, this is a corporate corpratocracy that used to be a democracy and we should have the right to form unions and join for the many reasons listed by rice, but the above mentioned corporatocracy is allowed to outsource jobs to slave labor and get money money money to let it in. These gatekeepers are responsible for the downfall of Western Civilization.



  • Arty Atmara 2011/03/05 05:17:07
    Arty
    THIS IS THE SON OF A BITCH WHO ELECTED BUSH And I will never forgive him .. I used to idolize him until then Rove could not have done better
  • Atmara Arty 2011/03/05 17:56:25
    Atmara
    No way. Gore/LIEBERMAN did that. The plan was to get Lieberman to be Prez if Gore won. Gores life insurance would run out.
    The Kerry. Kerry is related to Bush and threw the election to Bush.
    Why dont you turn your anger to all those who DO NOT VOTE? DID NOT VOTE
    HOW MANY DIDN'T VOTE AT ALL??? Stop spreading stupid lies and BS.

    DONT TAZE ME BRO!!!!

  • Mike56 2011/02/27 08:52:52
    Mike56
    Such a propagandist waste.
    I could smash all that garbage easily - but I don't want to take time from my rest. Just couple thoughts:
    1. Modern Unions are corporations per se - counterproductive ones, stealing from both working people and productive (job creating) corporations. Incompetent, stubborn, greedy and corrupt Unions are one of the major reasons businesses run overseas
    2. The most unbearable exploitation is characteristic to socialist dictatorships, where Unions, favored by "peoples' governments", are covering 100% of the working population.
    3. Nazis were ultra-left party
    4. The worst monopoly is the omnipresent bureaucracy in a one-party socialist society. You cannot complain, you cannot sue, you cannot oppose – they own you.
  • AL 2011/02/27 08:49:23
    AL
    +1
    Does it count if they're both screwing us at the very same time?
  • aneed2know 2011/02/27 08:45:42
    aneed2know
    +4
    abso;utely correct, wait till some of these people get pink slips, then they will know what the hell you are talking about. Ask the Union workers who did work for Maytag. Ask them how they felt when they were fired and that plant closed down and re-opened in Mexico, or teh workers of Huffy in Piqua Ohio when their plant closed down an the sam eone opened up in Mexico, and guess what they were not Union. Or ask the people of Circleville Ohio who workerd for Rubber Maid ask them how they felt when their plant closed down and opened up in China. All these things have one factor in common an dit aint Unions, it is wages. In America we need more than 500 dollars a year to survive, while the people in those countries can easil;ly survive on 500 dollars a year.

    But all these corporate loving fools with find out sooner or latter.
  • eyes wide open 2011/02/27 02:55:40
    eyes wide open
    i do not know any one who works for a union , but i have seen union parasites strangle plenty of business out of operation . your kind love to hate corp America but the rest like to have jobs .
  • riceron... eyes wi... 2011/02/27 05:10:40
  • eyes wi... riceron... 2011/02/27 07:38:24
    eyes wide open
    please keep your paranoia at bay
  • eyes wi... riceron... 2011/02/27 07:39:30
    eyes wide open
    well let me come start a union at your shop i want you to pay for it all and i want a raise evrey quarter .
  • riceron... eyes wi... 2011/02/27 19:09:59
  • eyes wi... riceron... 2011/02/27 20:35:47
    eyes wide open
    sure
  • Sir Bud. 2011/02/27 02:18:35
    Sir Bud.
    +2
    History has proved that we don't need Unions.Things were so much better before them and would be today.LOL.
    history unions lol Child in Coal Mine
    history unions lol Child in Coal Mine
    history unions lol 19th century Coal Pit workers
  • Arch Stanton 2011/02/27 00:48:47
  • Cold Warrior 2011/02/27 00:36:59
    Cold Warrior


    More mindless socialist drivel. These type of questions attract left wing liberal lobotomites like flies to manure.
  • riceron... Cold Wa... 2011/02/27 05:05:25
  • Georgia50 2011/02/26 23:42:04
    Georgia50
    Any ideology that marches forth on the perceived evil of others, offering little of redeemable value itself, is evil. That is what unionism has in common with fascism, Nazism, and communism: some group must be evil in order for it to retain validity.

    "The czars are evil, so let us murder like them--on an order of magnitude--instead."
  • Andrew 2011/02/26 23:16:23 (edited)
    Andrew
    +1
    I do not worship or trust corporations! That being said, I loathe labor unions! They are not what they claim and are more interested in their own corporation then they are with serving their members!
  • Georgia50 Andrew 2011/02/26 23:44:27
    Georgia50
    +1
    Interesting that we never hear unionists complain about their pension's ownership of corporate stock.
  • aneed2know Georgia50 2011/02/27 08:40:31
    aneed2know
    +2
    wow you really paid attention at Beck University didnt you, you even have all the talking points down. Let me ask you something do you follow along with a chalk board also, trying to make connections where there are none?
  • riceron... Andrew 2011/02/27 06:00:37
  • Larson Whipsnade 2011/02/26 23:15:43
    Larson Whipsnade
    +1
    Nearly all Soviet workers belonged to a union, yet they had no rights whatsoever, because the unions were controlled by the government, and were really just vehicles for the KGB to identify discontented workers, and send them to the Gulag. Just as it is in Cuba now. You Che-worshippers are nothing but fools, trying to import a totalitarian regime that apes Stalinism. do you really think you'll be happier with the government running every aspect of your life?
  • aneed2know Larson ... 2011/02/27 08:41:20
    aneed2know
    +2
    no they did not, the communist party would not allow it. and if they did i am sure you can provide proof of it right?
  • Larson ... aneed2know 2011/03/01 00:54:16
    Larson Whipsnade
    Yes- my Russian teacher was FROM Russia! why would she lie about that? she belonged to the Doctor's union in the USSR.
  • aneed2know Larson ... 2011/03/01 06:55:57
    aneed2know
    +1
    what ever not the same as a workers Union, come with another one why dont you.
  • Larson ... aneed2know 2011/03/01 22:36:04
    Larson Whipsnade
    how about my own self- I used to belong to the Teamsters Union, until I found out just what useless crooks they really are. All they ever did for me was take my money.
  • aneed2know Larson ... 2011/03/02 07:00:41
    aneed2know
    +1
    i am gonna answer this statement like i answered the last one. here is my answer " Sure you Did", there are allot of " I use to on Sodahead" an di believe most of them "Not"
  • Larson ... aneed2know 2011/03/03 01:43:06
    Larson Whipsnade
    you can believe what you want, but I told you the truth.
  • aneed2know Larson ... 2011/03/03 08:39:33
    aneed2know
    +1
    sure you did, Not.
  • Freeranger 2011/02/26 22:38:25
    Freeranger
    Just to answer the question at the top, I'll share this from a blog I stumbled on today, discussing the union, vs. capitalism bit. Granted, its oversimplification, but........I wish I'd written it.

    "...... someone has to be in charge and obviously that someone should be the owner of the company, not the people he hires."

    Sounds logical.
  • Georgia50 2011/02/26 22:33:27
    Georgia50
    +1
    World's smallest book: Union Inventions And Innovations. Union workers assemble what others create. No one assembles what unions create.
  • Bulldog 2011/02/26 21:27:27
    Bulldog
    +1
    Fascists do not let the private market run by itself any more than communists do. Perhaps that is why fascists, communists and socialists so often team up to destroy capitalist systems, then when that system fails, they fight amonst themselves to see who will get to kill who off.

    In China, it was the Communists that one, same as in Soviet Russia, but in Germany, it was the Fascists who teamed up with the communists, SUPPORTING THE UNIONS UNTIL THEY GOT POWER!

    Sorry history gets in the way of your little rant, but truth is truth.

    Unions were born in America due to corrupt businesses.

    Unions eventually became just as corrupt as those corporations they faught against.

    Unionization of Government employees is quite another issue, since Government employees are actually working fot the taxpayer, because it is the taxpayer who pays their salaries via the taxes they pay.

    They do not pay those taxes to pay people for not working! Yes, union workers were promised fat pensions and expensive benefits by those Governments they work for, BUT.......

    What is the first priority of the Government? To serve the few (the gov. workers), or the masses who pay them the taxes they must use to pay the unions? Both were given promises, both are entitled to have their government fullfill thei...



    Fascists do not let the private market run by itself any more than communists do. Perhaps that is why fascists, communists and socialists so often team up to destroy capitalist systems, then when that system fails, they fight amonst themselves to see who will get to kill who off.

    In China, it was the Communists that one, same as in Soviet Russia, but in Germany, it was the Fascists who teamed up with the communists, SUPPORTING THE UNIONS UNTIL THEY GOT POWER!

    Sorry history gets in the way of your little rant, but truth is truth.

    Unions were born in America due to corrupt businesses.

    Unions eventually became just as corrupt as those corporations they faught against.

    Unionization of Government employees is quite another issue, since Government employees are actually working fot the taxpayer, because it is the taxpayer who pays their salaries via the taxes they pay.

    They do not pay those taxes to pay people for not working! Yes, union workers were promised fat pensions and expensive benefits by those Governments they work for, BUT.......

    What is the first priority of the Government? To serve the few (the gov. workers), or the masses who pay them the taxes they must use to pay the unions? Both were given promises, both are entitled to have their government fullfill their promises to them, but there IS NOT ENOUGH MONEY TO DO BOTH!

    REALITY TIME! If you insist on unions forcing their way upon cash strapped Governments, you can expect them to lay most of you off because THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY YOU!

    What good is the right to stike and collectively bargain if you strike and collectively bargain yourselves out of a job? How does that help? How does that serve the greater public good?
    (more)
  • riceron... Bulldog 2011/02/26 22:26:23
  • Bulldog riceron... 2011/02/26 22:36:38
    Bulldog
    You miss the point entirely! Your trying to rationalize the value of a union to hold the Government hostage to the promises it cannot hope to sustainably pay!

    If you find a business doing what you say, you then arrest the owners, bosses, etc, and punish the traitors.

    Meanwhile, your still ignoring the facts! Employers will not choose to employ people if they cannot make a profit no matter if there are unions or not, no matter if we are socialist, Laiz au fair capitalists, or ???? (Communists do not let private individuals own a business, so there is no comparo there).

    As far as my history goes, prove me wrong!

    Did not Hitler side with the Communists until he gained enough power to defeat and KILL off those who helped him get in power?

    What about the rise of the Soviet Communists? Was there not a teaming up of both sides to defeat the Czars, then a purging of the loosers, including those who helped the Communists gain power?

    I could go on, but it is easy to say my accounting of history is full of holes, but quite another to PROVE it.
  • RobK1967 Bulldog 2011/02/27 04:16:01
    RobK1967
    +3
    Why is it you right wing loons never grasp the difference between your and you're?
  • Bulldog RobK1967 2011/02/27 04:28:27
    Bulldog
    Is that the very best argument you can bring to the thread?

    P.S. The answer is union proteced, Government run, PUBLIC EDUCATION! My parents could not afford to send me to a quality school.
  • RobK1967 Bulldog 2011/02/27 04:41:36
    RobK1967
    +3
    I received a public education and have no trouble knowing the difference, I think it is more due to the fact that RWNJs revel in their ignorance. I guess that also explains your lack of a grasp of history as well

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/22 23:37:18

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals