Blogs Civic_Minded's

Exposing the Hate Crimes Law as Unconstitutional!

1ST AMENDMENT UNDER FIRE
Petition seeks FCC probe into 'hate speech' in media
'What we are documenting here is a full-fledged assault'
By Bob Unruh
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId;=114529

A coalition of major religious denominations and organizations has launched a petition to the Federal Communications Commission asking for an investigation into "hate speech in the media" and how telecommunications might play a role in "hate crimes."

The petition is promoted by members of the "So We Might See" coalition that includes the United Church of Christ, the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops, the Islamic Society of North America, United Methodist Communications, Presbyterian Church (USA) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

The move comes as President Obama celebrates his signing just last week of a "hate crimes" law that provides special protections to people who live homosexual and other "alternative" sexual lifestyles.

Addressed to FCC chief Julius Genachowski, the petition asks for a "notice of inquiry into hate speech in the media."

"We are concerned about this issue because of the possible connection between hate speech and violent hate crimes and the lack of information for members of the public concerned about the issue," the petition states.

"The possible correlation between hate speech and violent crime gives us great pause. Immigrant, minority, and religious populations are often targets of hate speech before they are subsequently the target of physical hate crimes," the petition says.

"Hate speech in the media is a growing problem that must be examined before it can be solved. So We Might See supports efforts to increase the resources available to the public to understand hate speech. As members of the faith community, we will do our part to ask our members to raise their own voices condemning hate speech when they see it and to ask for all citizens to conduct themselves with civility," it says.

The move, however, was so controversial that the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops, while a part of the coalition, refused to sign on to the petition.

"USCCB supports the establishment of a broad public forum to debate the difficult constitutional and regulatory issues, including the potential danger to religious speech, raised by the petitioners," it said in a separate statement. "We are asking the FCC to make available a proceeding where the public can attempt to describe speech anyone deems harmful, and where the public (including Catholics and the bishops) can raise important constitutional constraints on government action regarding speech, including religious speech.

"We are not participating in any campaign to censor any organization, program or commentator," the organization said.

Matt Barber, Liberty Counsel attorney and author of the newly released book "The Right Hook – From the Ring to the Culture War," told WND passage of 'hate crimes' legislation "has emboldened the radical homosexual lobby, the quasi-Christian left and other fringe factions."

"There are terrific people who attend [United Church of Christ] churches, but the reality is that much of the UCC's leadership is cut from the same hateful, counter-biblical cloth as President Obama's racist, America-hating pastor Jeremiah Wright.

"I knew it was just a matter of time before the left – to include the Obama administration – would begin using the euphemistic terms 'hate crimes' and 'hate speech' interchangeably," Barber continued. "I just didn't think it would happen this fast. Those of us who opposed the new 'hate crimes' law have warned for years that the true agenda is, and has always been, to silence any opposition to liberal views, including opposition to the homosexual lifestyle."

Jeffrey Lord, a former Reagan White House political director and now a writer for American Spectator, wrote that while he is a member of the UCC, he has questions about the effort.

"Read the key phrases again. 'Open a notice of inquiry into hate speech in the media.' Meaning, church members are being asked to sign on to an already-in-progress petition to the FCC that is opening the door to legal sanctions from the federal government on 'hate speech in the media,'" he said.

Lord cited a petition accusation that talk radio icons had criticized immigrants.

"But to focus on that in this space would remove one's eye from the real fast ball. This petition has nothing to do with the immigration issue," he continued, citing an statement from FCC commissioner Michael Copps about the "comprehensive FCC evaluation of the state of broadcast journalism."

"Now, how would one push for such a 'comprehensive FCC evaluation' of talk radio?" Lord asked. "And if, just by chance of course, you also wanted to de-legitimatize and silence not just talk radio … but Fox News … well, how exactly could you try and do that? How do you get this ball rolling?"

Lord said it would be necessary to have the question raised to the FCC by an outside group. Additionally, he said, there needs to be the "raw political power" to attack the issue.

He cited the George-Soros-sponsored Media Democracy Fund as one of several financial supporters of the "So We Might See" organization.

"These religious groups are to convey the idea that talk radio and Fox News are guilty of 'hate speech' as illustrated by links naming or presenting Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Lou Dobbs, Michael Savage in this fashion," he wrote.

"What we are documenting here is a full-fledged assault on conservative media. On talk radio and on Fox News. An assault by name on some, on others with their names left out, but surely every bit the target as the others. … Leading this charge or involved in some capacity are at least one commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, seven national churches, one left-wing billionaire who helps as always with the funding – and last but certainly not least, the White House. Specifically that would be Messrs. Emanuel, Axelrod and Ms. [Anita] Dunn," Lord wrote.

"Hello? Is anyone home here? Is the First Amendment – which interestingly protects these very same churches – going to be assaulted like this while everyone just sits by and says nothing?"
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Top Comment
  • +10 raves BienvenuJDC November 05, 2009 03:30:45
    BienvenuJDC
    I don't agree with much of what is said in most churches. Many of them teach things that just are not in the Bible. There are many of them that don't use the Bible at all, but they preach their own agenda....

    HOWEVER, in this great nation, they have the freedom to speak what they wish to... and people have the responsibility to have a discriminatory judgment to listen and believe... OR to ignore and reject.

    Liberals took the 'freedom of speech' and changed it into the 'freedom of expression'...then used that to justify vulgarity and intolerance of religion (i.e. the Maplethorpe Exhibit).

    Now they are trying to do the opposite by making laws against 'hate crimes'... (and who would be against laws that are against 'hate' and 'crimes'?)... but then they subtly change 'hate crimes' into 'hate speech', then they define the 'hate speech' into anything that is in opposition to their agenda. They will be adamantly opposed to any other application of 'hate speech' since it is their term.

    Politically Correct speech is a hobby of theirs, but PC is just the first steps to Orwell's 'DoubleSpeak' and 'NewSpeak'. It goes along with the ever so subtle practice of revisionist history. Just ask Winston Smith.

    steps orwells doublespeak newspeak subtle practice revisionist history winston smith
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +1 raves
    red hulk November 07, 2009 06:48:16
    red hulk
    I am not surprised by the Obama administration passing laws that restrict freedom of speech.
  • +2 raves
    NotWithoutAFight November 07, 2009 05:41:09 (edited)
    NotWithoutAFight
    I find it repugnant that this president and administration is so afraid of those that don't two step with 'em that they will enact legislation because they are pussies and their bullshit rhetoric cannot bear scrutiny.

    Hate crime legislation is one of the biggest bunch of horseshit I've ever heard of - seeking to read into the hearts of men and women and punishing those supposed thoughts.

    Every crime is a hate crime. And a bloody child rapist shouldn't get more time for raping that child than him assaulting a gay guy with a fist.
  • +2 raves
    Civic_M... NotWith... November 07, 2009 06:16:57 (edited)
    Civic_Minded
    "Oh, No! I'm gonna tell my Daddy what you said!"
    gonna daddy
  • +2 raves
    Deep007 November 06, 2009 20:22:59
    Deep007
    Hate. Hate is how homosexuals feel toward heterosexuals. How Liberals feel toward comservatives. How many Obama blacks feel toward white. Its is resentment toward something good, something right. a light that must be squashed, for to let it flicker would illuminate what is wrong inside of them.
  • +2 raves
    Civic_M... Deep007 November 07, 2009 01:43:40
    Civic_Minded
    It seems this administration wants to make political speak into "hate speech" in order to silence dissent. The FCC will once again become a tool to do just that. This is why it is good that the FCC is being pressed to bring into the open what parameters apply. They aren't ready to do this as they know the public will challenge them on the unconstitutionality of limiting free speech.
  • +1 raves
    Arizona... Civic_M... November 07, 2009 18:28:07
    Arizona1950
    Have you seen this ...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch_...
  • +1 raves
    Civic_M... Arizona... November 08, 2009 03:34:44
    Civic_Minded
    Yes, I have - just yesterday.
  • Arizona... Civic_M... November 08, 2009 05:40:52
    Arizona1950
    I never realized he was such a liar until I watched that video. Funny, although I have come to the conclusion that he is the worse thing that ever happened to this country I still continued to want to believe that he still was an American. Now I know better.
  • +2 raves
    Civic_M... Deep007 November 07, 2009 02:00:34
    Civic_Minded
    I don't think they see it from your point of view. They think it is something wrong with the conservative thinking - that the left is right and the right is wrong. Of course this fails to recognize that this country was founded on conservative values. The Constitution is such a pesky thing to the left.
    Listen to the president speak on the constitution's limitations at the link:
    http://www.metacafe.com/watch...
  • +2 raves
    dick November 06, 2009 16:47:00
    dick
    Obie and his rat pack would love to do away with the constitution it would be a big leap for their socialist agenda! obie rat pack love constitution leap socialist agenda obie rat pack love constitution leap socialist agenda obie rat pack love constitution leap socialist agenda obie rat pack love constitution leap socialist agenda
  • +3 raves
    Romanov November 05, 2009 20:00:09
    Romanov
    This new hate crime legislation is just another end run around the First Amendment. They know that if they can silence dissent by labeling certain speech hateful they can control the American people to their liking. As an examble of this tactic, in Australia, some Churches are in trouble for preaching that Homosexual behavior is abhorrent. And as someone else mentioned earlier in this post, about Mark Steyn being put on trial in Canada for what he said about Moslems. If we let this kind of thing happen in the U.S. we are in big trouble. Besides I thought that when people are commiting crimes against other people, they aren't exactly showing how much they like them in the first place.
  • +2 raves
    Civic_M... Romanov November 05, 2009 20:16:14
    Civic_Minded
    I had heard about the issue in Australia also. Excellent comment. Thank you.
  • +4 raves
    Guila (Scoop) FIGHT TO KEEP... November 05, 2009 18:24:42
    Guila (Scoop) FIGHT TO KEEP OUR GREAT NATION
    I think that all crimes are hate crimes and I truly believe that is unnecessary to have a special bill for a certain group of people. Aren't we all equal? Why is a special hate crime bill needed?
  • +3 raves
    J November 05, 2009 17:02:58
    J
    Expanding on hate crimes...

    John Wayne Gacy killed 33 people - but he liked them all. No crime out of hate.

    Eddie Gein killed people and word their skins - because he respected them.
    No crime out of hate.

    Albert Fish killed children because he had so much hope for their futures.
    No hate crime here.

    Bernie Madoff stole from people because he wanted to help THEM.
    He didn't hate them.

    It seems to me that when you commit such a crime intending to hurt, harm or kill someone else - it's root is of hate.
  • +3 raves
    Civic_M... J November 05, 2009 19:24:32
    Civic_Minded
    ... or greed, jealousy, insanity!
  • +2 raves
    J Civic_M... November 05, 2009 19:47:37
    J
    All are equally deplorable.
  • +2 raves
    Jim November 05, 2009 16:17:12
    Jim
    Little by little they chip away at our Constitution and one day we wake up and it will be gone. Much of it is ignored already.

    Like the dark ages when the Catholics burned people alive at the stake who taught and spoke the truth, so will the coming days be. Only those willing to sacrifice all that they are or have will speak the truth.

    History shows that for everyone they lock up, kill, or maim, God prepares two to take their place. It is in such dark days when the truth is outlawed that the true soldiers for Christ will be made manifest. It will not be a time for those who are lukewarm.
  • +4 raves
    judy ann November 05, 2009 15:15:45
    judy ann
    The truth will set you free. People who speak the truth, like Fox, will get the message to the people, you know the part in the constitution that say WE THE PEOPLE. People need to have this to protect them from the so call radicals. Tea party groups and etc. are not hate groups, These are people that have the guts to stand up to gov.
  • +4 raves
    IndyLinda November 05, 2009 13:47:54
    IndyLinda
    When the truth itself is "hateful" -- you know why the left must legislate against truth and for the lies -- their guilt is crushing them.
  • +4 raves
    Brian Kemp November 05, 2009 13:17:55
    Brian Kemp
    I'll never really get hate crimes laws. If it's illegal to beat someone up, or kill them, what does making it more illegal do? Other than possibly add to the jail time of the offender? It's not like it's a greater deterrent.

About Me

Civic_Minded

Civic_Minded

TX, US

December 09, 2008 17:04:42

is concerned about the future.

View complete profile

or
Cancel