Quantcast

Exciting things to look forward to as we march down the 1 world government road (or we can choose to change the course our country is on):

LAAD Gunner - USMC 2012/03/29 23:49:17

By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh Tuesday, March 20, 2012

I am sure there are many Americans who have no idea nor care what “The Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development” (DICED) is. They should. Some call the Draft Covenant “Agenda 21 on steroids” while others see it as the “Environmental Constitution of global governance.”

The
first version of the Covenant was presented to the United Nations in
1995 on the occasion of its 50th anniversary. It was hoped that it would
become a negotiating document for a global treaty on environmental
conservation and sustainable development.

The fourth version of the Covenant, issued on September 22, 2010, was written to control all development tied to the environment, “the highest form of law for all human activity.’

The
Covenant’s 79 articles, described in great detail in 242 pages, take
Sustainable Development principles described in Agenda 21 and transform
them into global law, which supersedes all constitutions including the
U.S. Constitution.

All
signatory nations, including the U.S., would become centrally planned,
socialist countries in which all decisions would be made within the
framework of Sustainable Development.

In
collaboration with Earth Charter and Elizabeth Haub Foundation for
Environmental Policy and Law from Canada, the Covenant was issued by the
International Council on Environmental Law (ICEL) in Bonn, Germany, and
the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with offices in Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Federal
agencies that are members of the International Union for Conservation
of Nature (IUCN) include U.S. Department of State, Commerce, Agriculture
(Forest Service), Interior (Fish and Wildlife, National
Park Service), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The same
agencies are members of the White House Rural Council and the newly
established White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities
(Executive Order, March 15, 2012).

The
Draft Covenant is a blueprint “to create an agreed single set of
fundamental principles like a ‘code of conduct’ used in many civil law,
socialist, and theocratic traditions, which may guide States,
intergovernmental organizations, and individuals.”

The
writers describe the Covenant as a “living document,” a blueprint that
will be adopted by all members of the United Nations. They say that
global partnership is necessary in order to achieve
Sustainable Development, by focusing on “social and economic pillars.”
The writers are very careful to avoid the phrase, “one world
government.” Proper governance is necessary on all levels, “from the
local to the global.” (p.36)

The
Covenant underwent four writings, in 1995, 2000, 2004, and 2010,
influenced by the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development,
by ideas of development control and social engineering by the United
Nations, “leveling the playing field for international trade, and having
a common basis of future lawmaking.”

  • Article 3 proposes that the entire globe should be under “the protection of international law.”
  • Article 11 discusses “equity” and “equitable manner” which are code words for communism.
  • Article 16 requires that all member nations must adopt environmental conservation into all national decisions.
  • Article
    20 requires that all nations must “mitigate the adverse effects of
    climate change.” If we ratify this document, we must thus fight a
    non-existent man-made climate change.
  • Article 31 requires the eradication of poverty by spreading the wealth from developed nations to developing countries.
  • Article 32 requires recycling.
  • Article
    33 demands that countries calculate “the size of the human population
    their environment is capable of supporting and to implement measures
    that prevent the population from exceeding that level.”
  • Article 33 delineates long-term resettlement and estimating the “carrying capacity of the environment.”
  • Article
    34 demands the maintenance of an open and non-discriminatory
    international trading system in which “prices of commodities and raw
    materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental
    costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing, and where
    appropriate, ultimate disposal.” The capitalist model of supply and
    demand pricing does not matter.
  • Article 36 describes military and hostile activities.
  • Article 39 decides management plans and quotas for permissible taking or “harvesting transboundary biological resources.”
  • Article
    41 requires integrated planning systems, irrespective of administrative
    boundaries within a country, and is based on Paragraph 10.5 of Agenda
    21, which seeks to “facilitate allocation of land to the uses that
    provide the greatest sustainable benefits and to promote the transition
    to a sustainable and integrated management of land resources.” The
    impact assessment procedure is developed by the World Bank.
    “Aquifers,
    drainage basins, coastal, marine areas, and any areas called ecological
    units must be taken into account when allocating land for municipal,
    agricultural, grazing, forestry, and other uses.” Agricultural subsidies
    are discouraged, as well as subsidizing private enterprises.
    “Physical
    planning must follow an integrated approach to land use –
    infrastructure, highways, railways, waterways, dams, and harbors. Town
    and country planning must include land use plans elaborated at all
    levels of government.”
  • Article
    48 demands that biotechnology from research and development and
    royalties be shared; free access and transfer of technology is also
    required.
  • Article
    51 reveals that we will have to pay for these repressive new
    requirements while Article 52 shows that we must pay 0.7 percent of GDP
    for Official Development Assistance. This reaffirms the political
    commitment made in Paragraph 33.13 of Agenda 21 in 1992.
  • Article
    69 deals with settlement of disputes by an arbitrary tribunal such as
    the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the International Court of Justice,
    or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
  • Article
    71 describes the amendment process, which is submitted to the
    Secretary-General of the United Nations. UN Secretary-General would
    review the implementation of this document every five years.

Writers
of the Draft Covenant are the UN Secretariat, international lawyers,
and U.S. professors from Cornell, Princeton, Pace University, Middlebury
College, George Washington University Law School, Bucknell University,
University of Indiana, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Meadville
Theological School, University of the Pacific, two General Counsel
Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency, and two
attorneys in private practice.

Since
this Draft Covenant has a Preamble and 79 articles, it is obviously
intended to be a world constitution for global governance, an onerous
way to control population growth, re-distribute wealth, force social and
“economic equity and justice,” economic control, consumption control,
land and water use control, and re-settlement control as a form of
social engineering.

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Bozette 2012/03/30 00:05:13
    Bozette
    +8
    Have been spreading the word on this...we need to withdraw from the UN completely.

    spreading withdraw completely
    screw the un

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Sheepdog 2012/03/30 05:56:20 (edited)
    Sheepdog
    +1
    Look into the Georgia stones to see it writing.

    Geogia stones
  • TheTruth1313 2012/03/30 04:47:09
    TheTruth1313
    +1
    Yes, it does look as if that lying socialist traitor Obama is trying to give the UN more and more power here. We need to make it understood that the UN should have NO power whatsoever, when it comes to US making US policy. Perhaps a move out pf the UN would not be such a bad idea. Or at least how about we vote that piece of trash Obama the hell out of office. Make the pledge!!
  • ruru 2012/03/30 03:24:57
    ruru
    Time for the USA to withdraw from the United Nations.
  • relic 2012/03/30 01:14:01
    relic
    +4
    I've been aware of the World Government movement for a long time. Anything you can do to make others aware is welcomed.

    Thanks for a good article. I hope people read it and begin to do something.
  • LAAD Gu... relic 2012/03/30 01:16:01
    LAAD Gunner - USMC
    +4
    Just relay the message, sound the bells, wake the sheep
  • Sheepdog LAAD Gu... 2012/03/30 06:00:50
    Sheepdog
    +2
    Good luck with that. we the
  • LAAD Gu... Sheepdog 2012/03/30 06:09:27
    LAAD Gunner - USMC
    +2
    no kiddin...
  • Blackjack 2012/03/30 00:47:21
    Blackjack
    +2
    We need a president that stands up to the one world government not one that apologizes to it.
  • nverumind Blackjack 2012/03/30 00:49:58
    nverumind
    +4
    he doesnt apologize to it ..HE welcomes it ..his father was an anti colonialist and so is he.. He welcomes one world government and his actions show it ...slowly but surely we will see . Read his autobiography.. "Dreams from my father"
  • Blackjack nverumind 2012/03/30 00:56:12 (edited)
    Blackjack
    +2
    He's definitely for it but what I meant was that Obama hates America so much he thought he needed to apologize for our country.
  • nverumind Blackjack 2012/03/30 01:26:37 (edited)
    nverumind
    +1
    well whatever he feels he needs to do..and right after, get the hell out of it!
  • Bozette 2012/03/30 00:05:13
    Bozette
    +8
    Have been spreading the word on this...we need to withdraw from the UN completely.

    spreading withdraw completely
    screw the un
  • Rick Bozette 2012/03/30 03:59:55
  • Mr.Reasonable 2012/03/29 23:59:39
    Mr.Reasonable
    +3
    Great post!
  • LAAD Gu... Mr.Reas... 2012/03/30 00:19:00
    LAAD Gunner - USMC
    +1
    Thanks Reasonable!
  • RJ~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/29 23:55:24
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +6
    Get the US out of the UN, and the UN out of the US!!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/09/01 21:13:43

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals