Quantcast

Elizabeth Warren’s Incredible 52 Second Destruction of Romney’s Alternate Reality

ProudProgressive 2012/05/15 13:13:34

Watch Elizabeth Warren’s Incredible 52 Second Destruction of Romney’s Alternate Reality
By: Jason Easley
May 15, 2012

Elizabeth Warren demonstrated why Wall Street doesn’t want her in the Senate with a 52 second destruction of Mitt Romney’s alternative reality that the banks are over regulated.



After Warren explained that there is no regulator looking over the shoulder of the big banks, and how dangerous it is for the country that they are still in charge of their own risk practices, Maddow asked her about Mitt Romney’s claims that Wall Street regulation is choking off growth, and there has been too much of a crackdown on the banks. Warren responded, “You know, you really want to say did he hear what Jamie Dimon just said? Jamie Dimon’s own words were that this was stupid. This was sloppy, so stupid, and so sloppy that it wasn’t even picked up by a regulator. There was no one to say hey, wait a minute; I want to review your risk practices. I want to see the kind of risk that this huge financial institution is taking on, because we’re just about three and a half years past the time when you took on so much risk that you brought this economy almost to its knees. So the idea that Mitt Romney thinks that the banks are over regulated. It’s an alternative reality. It’s simply not true. The problem right now is that there’s not adequate regulation.”

It only took Elizabeth Warren fifty two seconds to explain to the world that Mitt Romney’s views on bank regulation and Wall Street are out of touch with reality. She made it clear that if Romney really believes that the banks are under regulated, he is living in a fantasy world. Her remarks to Rachel Maddow are part of the reason why Wall Street is working so hard to try to keep Elizabeth Warren out of the Senate. The reason why Wall Street and the big banks and dumping money into Mitt Romney and Scott Brown’s campaigns is that they are terrified of what an Obama/Warren team might be able to accomplish.

Wall Street has nightmares about what Elizabeth Warren could accomplish in the Senate. Imagine the legislation she could put forward, the media platform she could build, and if Democrats kept control of the Senate the committees that she could eventually chair, and the hearings that she could hold. Elizabeth Warren is Wall Street’s worst nightmare, which is why they are donating millions to Scott Brown.

Wall Street isn’t trying to keep Brown in. They are trying to keep Warren out.

Mitt Romney holds the exact same view of Wall Street that George W. Bush did. Even when the Wall Street behaves badly, they are not to be regulated. It doesn’t matter if their behavior is harming millions of Americans and the entire economy. What’s good for Wall Street is good for America, except when it isn’t and Wall Street pushes the nation towards the brink of collapse, but even then regulations are evil.

Corporations and their risky decisions that ruin lives are more important than the people they harm with their behavior. Elizabeth Warren’s ideas are the antidote to this poison, and Wall Street is doing their best to try to prevent America from ever getting the cure that she so desperately needs.


Read More: http://www.politicususa.com/elizabeth-warren-romne...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • mich52 2012/05/15 13:36:42
    mich52
    +12
    Warren rocks, Wall St and the GOP are so afraid of her, I really hope she is elected.. Dodd-Frank didn't go far enough in regulating derivatives..

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • luvguins 2012/05/22 02:37:38
    luvguins
    Scott Brown is Wall Sts. main man in the Senate, so they have keep all the money he's received from them under wraps with a distraction against Elizabeth Warren who is Wall Sts. nemesis. The Cherokee connection they have used to accuse her with getting affirmative action in college is totally bogus and character assassination. Brown can't win with his extreme Senate voting record in liberal MA so they have to try and diminish Warren's escalating popularity there. I see the righties here are having their usual ignorant bash Warren fest, but she is probably going to get rid of Wall St. Brown.
  • WGN 2012/05/16 00:49:34
    WGN
    +1
    When an entity can not regulate itself for the good of the country, it is then up to the government to regulate it. The banks want to play fast and loose, and that is part of what has caused the recession we are in. It is high time that the GOP stopped their whining about regulation and supported something that is the correct thing to do (for once).
    Warren is bright, articulate, and puts Romney and the rest of the GOP to shame.
  • Gloria 2012/05/15 23:57:59
    Gloria
    Deregulation always melts down.
  • S* 2012/05/15 20:51:27
    S*
    +1
    good discussion.
  • Mel the Witch POTL PWCM~JLA 2012/05/15 20:51:20
    Mel the Witch POTL PWCM~JLA
    +2
    Ahhhhhhhhh Running lies Warren, Her Family actually Murdered Cherokee, She should be arrested and charged for fraud. Anyone who even listens to this Witch deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. She is just a scum bag liberal who needs to be Executed!!!!
  • RJ~PWCM... Mel the... 2012/05/15 21:55:16
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    As the great Bob Grant would say, she's a class-A sickola!
  • Ev Rom Mel the... 2012/05/15 22:13:18
    Ev Rom
    +1
    Is this like your guys Palin argument, that she scares you so much you are only left with insults?
  • Mel the... Ev Rom 2012/05/15 22:22:06
    Mel the Witch POTL PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Least Palin's ancestors did not murder Cherokee, then Lie and say she was Cherokee...Didn't think that one out did you?
  • Ev Rom Mel the... 2012/05/15 22:26:36 (edited)
    Ev Rom
    +1
    didn't most of our ancestor murder Cherokee? they owned slaves as well but its seems to only bothers you when a democrat does it.
  • Stryder 2012/05/15 20:33:14 (edited)
    Stryder
    +4
    You mean the Elizabeth Warren who fraudulently claimed to be a Native American? THAT Elizabeth Warren? Who gives a rat's ass about her opinion?
  • RJ~PWCM... Stryder 2012/05/15 21:55:41
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    Apparently, progressives with single-digit IQ's do!
  • Stryder RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 01:04:36
    Stryder
    What else do they have?
  • gfreeman BN-0 2012/05/15 19:53:23
  • The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk 2012/05/15 19:47:21
    The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk
    +2
    The too many regulators we hear so much about, don't even exist. The movement is resistant to the concept of regulation. I can only guess that they take it a step further and pretend that the regulations that are warranted have already been put in place. But it's simply not true. And by seeing what JP Morgan Chase just did, clearly there's a need for regulation. What JP Morgan Chase did was legal... True, but it doesn't make it right! Peeing on a dog is legal, but I wouldn't suggest doing it in front of a crowd.
    The bottom line is the banks are taking the same risks, and treating the nations economy like a casino, and if they end up having the true Vegas experience and need a bailout, guess what... We don't have it this time. They might think they are "Too big to fail" if that's true than they should also acknowledge that they are Too big to be this irresponsible.
  • RJ~PWCM... The Eli... 2012/05/15 21:57:44
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Apparently, liberals who don't understand ANYTHING about financial matters believe that **losses** can be regulated out of existence.

    But in the real world, they can't.
  • Ev Rom RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/15 22:14:31
    Ev Rom
    +1
    but you can stop corporate welfare.
  • RJ~PWCM... Ev Rom 2012/05/15 23:34:41
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Yes, like 0bama handed out to GM, Chrysler, Solyndra, and who knows how many other companies.
  • Ev Rom RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 00:17:52
    Ev Rom
    Obama and republicans, I dont think Bush was opposed
  • RJ~PWCM... Ev Rom 2012/05/16 01:33:03
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Wrong.
  • Ev Rom RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 02:05:44
    Ev Rom


    Bush "rescue plan" seems Obama did what Bush would have done.
  • RJ~PWCM... Ev Rom 2012/05/16 11:44:18
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    0bama did it.
  • Ev Rom RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 14:02:14
    Ev Rom
    So did Bush
  • The Eli... RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/15 22:37:50
    The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk
    Let's see if you're singing the same tune when they're crying for another bailout.
  • RJ~PWCM... The Eli... 2012/05/15 23:35:09
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    They shouldn't get ANY bailouts. Too bad 0bama doesn't believe that.
  • The Eli... RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 22:42:53
    The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk
    Too bad bush didn't either.
  • YouSirName RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/21 23:07:57 (edited)
    YouSirName
    +1
    No one is arguing that losses can be regulated away. The point is that bankers shouldn't be allowed to make HUGE STUPID losses due to "hunches." perhaps you believe that it would be fine for banks to take your money and play it on the ponies. Some of us object to that sort of gambling and believe that regulation to prevent it is a good thing.
  • RJ~PWCM... YouSirName 2012/05/22 09:40:20
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Where did you read it was a "hunch"?

    Your whole argument is based on a false premise.
  • YouSirName RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/25 20:42:38
    YouSirName
    Not wrong.

    From Bloomberg:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    "Dimon pushed Drew’s unit, which invests deposits the bank hasn’t loaned, to seek profit by speculating on higher-yielding assets such as credit derivatives, according to five former executives. The CEO suggested positions, a current executive said. Profits surged over the next five years as assets quadrupled to $356 billion and employees were given proprietary- trading accounts, current and former executives said.

    Dimon said on May 10 that the unit made “egregious mistakes” by taking flawed positions on synthetic credit securities and that New York-based JPMorgan could lose an additional $1 billion or more as it winds down the position. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating, according to people familiar with the probes."

    JP Morgan was trying to increase profits by buying credit derivatives with huge leveraging. This was speculation - i.e. hunches.
  • RJ~PWCM... YouSirName 2012/05/30 13:05:22
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Neither the story you reference or the dictionary definition of speculation (in its financial sense) uses the word "hunch."

    That's YOUR conclusion, and it's WRONG.
  • relic 2012/05/15 19:40:05
  • nverumind 2012/05/15 18:30:19
    nverumind
    +3
    She knows what she's talking about and i like her position and support for more regulations
  • RJ~PWCM... nverumind 2012/05/15 21:58:22
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Apparently, liberals who don't understand ANYTHING about financial matters believe that **losses** can be regulated out of existence.

    But in the real world, they can't.
  • nverumind RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 02:45:58
    nverumind
    +2
    well lack of regulation and nill accountability gets us into this mess, and Not a liberal nice try tho
    go sit in a corner
  • RJ~PWCM... nverumind 2012/05/16 11:46:33
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    You couldn't engage in an intelligent conversation about Wall Street and financial instruments if your life depended on it.

    And you KNOW it, so you resort to name-calling and silly pictures, just like the two-year old that you are.
  • nverumind RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 15:30:40
    nverumind
    LOL ok..
  • nverumind RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 15:34:52
    nverumind
    speaking of name calling i think that puts you at 2 and me at one.. People like you who think their intelligence is above and beyond anyone else's. Make me laugh, Because my opinion on the matter differs from yours you resort to calling me a liberal and now a two year old. Get a life. IF you want to have a conversation on Wallsteet, TRY ME! but if you cant hold up your INTELLECTUAL end of the conversation without name calling and throwing tantrums because someone doesn't agree with you, be on your way.
  • RJ~PWCM... nverumind 2012/05/16 16:56:51
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    Yeah right sure, attack other people, drone on & on - anything BUT actually discuss the issue at hand.
  • nverumind RJ~PWCM... 2012/05/16 17:06:54
    nverumind
    haha so what issue would you like to talk about your the one stating that i can not uphold an intelligent convo..but in fact ive voiced my opinon above and you are the one who has resorted to anything but discuss the issue at hand..so if you do not ACTUALLY have something you would like to discuss or debate then STOP replying !~
  • RJ~PWCM~JLA 2012/05/15 18:00:38
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +9
    In a matchup between a Communist imbecile like Warren, and a successful businessman like Romney, rational people will choose the successful businessman every time.

    Besides, Warren is a pathological liar. (I'd say she "speaks with forked tongue", but I wouldn't want to offend anybody.)

    chief warren
  • scbluesman13 2012/05/15 17:56:48
    scbluesman13
    +1
    I seriously hope Warren considers a run for the Presidency someday, after kicking Scott Brown's arse up and down the street in this upcoming election. If someone like Obama can get elected President as a junior senator, imagine how popular Warren would be with the populist left.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 13:57:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals