Now who does that remind you of?
Elizabeth Warren uses Alinsky tactics against Cherokees. Should 'Chief Talking Bull' admit she is not Cherokee?
FanOreilly
2012/06/24 00:47:01
|
|
|||||
|
51 votes
|
|
89% | ||
|
6 votes
|
|
11% | ||
Elizabeth Warren uses Alinsky tactics against Cherokees.
Four Cherokee women went to Boston this week to try to meet Elizabeth Warren to show Warren genealogical evidence proving that Warren has no Cherokee ancestry, and to explain to Warren why her continued insistence that she is Cherokee is offensive.
One of the Cherokee women, Twila Barnes, is a genealogist who has written extensively at her blog about Warren’s lack of Cherokee ancestry, and is part of a group of Cherokees who demand that Warren tell the truth.
I have linked to Barnes’ posts many times and have spoken with her about her genealogical findings and evidence. Unlike Warren, I actually cared about the evidence.
Last week, the women sent e-mails and made a phone call to Warren’s campaign press secretary, Alethea Harney, requesting a meeting. Harney never responded to the e-mails and did not call back.
Should 'Chief Talking Bull' admit she is not Cherokee?
Read More: http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/06/elizabeth-war...
Top Opinion
-
Yes, Chief Talking-Bull should admit she is a liar
+19Elizabeth Warren has lied about her ancestry to get into Harvard and swindle her way into political power.
Now who does that remind you of?
EW has more than a little explaining to do about her family. There is no evidence in her face nd the face painting is strictly from hunger and aan insult. The Cherokees could paint the face, but I've never seen such a configuration
Most claimed the popular names like Souix and Cherokee. If Warren claims to be One sixteenth Cherokee. Just how many years back is that? Even if true. Making a claim to it is really lame.
It's pretty bold of the Cherokee ladies to confront her, and like a lot of the hiding the Libs are doing these days. I'm not surprised she won't talk with them.