
Edvard Munch's 'The Scream' Goes for $119M: Do You Like the Painting?
SodaHead News
2012/05/03 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
316 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
370 votes
|
|
54% | |||
You might not know Edvard Munch by name, but there's a good chance you've seen his masterpiece, "The Scream," somewhere before. The 1890s oil-and-pastel is one of the most iconic paintings in the art world, right up there with Picasso's "Guernica", Van Gogh's "Starry Night," and da Vinci's "Mona Lisa." After sitting in the hands of Norwegian billionaire Petter Olsen for his entire life, the 1895 version of the painting sold to an unknown buyer for a record-breaking $119.9 million at an auction.
We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

Top Opinion
-
NarcolepticGoat 2012/05/03 19:46:46Yes





















That's why the people in the background are not alarmed.
I like his prints (woodcuts, linotypes etc) better than i like his paintings.
Over twenty years ago, I bought a book of his prints, and I found them to be powerful images.
And yes, I'm glad to see Munch is getting the recognition he deserves..
It's nice but when I saw it the first time I really did scream a little on the inside.
You are a Republican . . Right?
A self-described Conservative?
That explains your lack of insight and humanity . . . and your incredibly poor judgement.
Of course you dislike Munch's art.
It couldn't be any other way.
I can imagine myself at 12 years old trying to sell this thing door to door......
I try to appreciate all works of art.as an amateur painter myself, I realize how hard it is to paint a face, a meadow or do an abstract painting. I am sure none of my paintings will ever be worth 119 million, I can only hope that my kids keep them as memories of me!
I see the Scream painting as a message from the painters soul. Perhaps a bad dream , a fear of something or a way to convey fear. I think it is provoking and conjures up so many thoughts. I loved Kinkade and sorry he died so young recently , he was a grand painter, Monet , Picasso and Van Gogh are my other favorites.
Basically I would never trash anyone's art form of self expression because it reveals something of that person, whether you like it or not. It is called Art Appreciation , I took it in college!
It's said that "art is in the eye of thebeholder". To me, "art" is con artistry. But, I guess someone beheld $119 mil worth of "art" in this piece of crap.
It's really not much as far as paintings go. Sure I'd pay $119M...if the M stands for maybe or maybe not.