
Edvard Munch's 'The Scream' Goes for $119M: Do You Like the Painting?
SodaHead News
2012/05/03 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
316 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
370 votes
|
|
54% | |||
You might not know Edvard Munch by name, but there's a good chance you've seen his masterpiece, "The Scream," somewhere before. The 1890s oil-and-pastel is one of the most iconic paintings in the art world, right up there with Picasso's "Guernica", Van Gogh's "Starry Night," and da Vinci's "Mona Lisa." After sitting in the hands of Norwegian billionaire Petter Olsen for his entire life, the 1895 version of the painting sold to an unknown buyer for a record-breaking $119.9 million at an auction.
We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

Top Opinion
-
NarcolepticGoat 2012/05/03 19:46:46Yes





















The one recently auctioned was owned by a family who knew Munch.
Munch wrote on the frame of this one a poem describing the feelings of the artwork:
“I was walking along the road with two friends the sun was setting
the sky turned a bloody red And I felt a whiff of melancholy
I stood still, deathly tired
over the blue-black fjord and city hung blood and tongues of fire my friends walked on – I remained behind
shivering with anxiety
I felt the great scream in nature – EM”
It's a start on the path. But it's also obvious that Edvard Munch hadn't experienced the despair, to the point that when you do scream, it's something torn out of a primitive part of you, that frightens others that hear it, and that point on, that's the only way you can scream, whether in anguish, anger or victory, because your being now has a scar, that won't ever heal.
I don’t care for that one: seems contrived/cliché to me. It doesn't interest me in the slightest, and I'm quite a fan of art.
I like this guys' work much better though ~
Seattle Artist, Ethan Jack Harrington,
http://ethanjackharrington.bl...
While going to Culinary School in 2005,
I lived in downtown Seattle, and saw
this cat standing on the sidewalk,
outside my apartment building,
with easel set up, painting,
ironically, the building I
lived in... I stopped to
admire his work, an'
have since been
happily hooked
;0 )
This first one is called ' Caviar ', and is my favorite !