
Edvard Munch's 'The Scream' Goes for $119M: Do You Like the Painting?
SodaHead News
2012/05/03 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
316 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
370 votes
|
|
54% | |||
You might not know Edvard Munch by name, but there's a good chance you've seen his masterpiece, "The Scream," somewhere before. The 1890s oil-and-pastel is one of the most iconic paintings in the art world, right up there with Picasso's "Guernica", Van Gogh's "Starry Night," and da Vinci's "Mona Lisa." After sitting in the hands of Norwegian billionaire Petter Olsen for his entire life, the 1895 version of the painting sold to an unknown buyer for a record-breaking $119.9 million at an auction.
We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

We say the 1895 "version" because, believe it or not, it isn't the only original. Olsen's 1895 pastel-only version is one of four. There were two done in oil, one in pastel (Olsen's), and one in egg tempera. They were all completed between the years 1893 and 1910. According to The Daily Mail, Olsen's father was a friend and patron of Munch's, and presumably bought the original from the painter himself.
Of the pastel, Olsen said, "I have lived with this work all of my life, and its power and energy have only increased with time. Now however, I feel the moment has come to offer the rest of the world a chance to own and appreciate this remarkable work." He put it up for auction with Sotheby's in New York, and started the bidding at $40 million. The final price beat Picasso's "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," which sold for $106.5 million in 2010, but Van Gogh's "Portrait of Dr. Gachet" would still hold the record if adjusted for inflation.
Of course, art is always somewhat subjective -- in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Most of us couldn't imagine being able to afford an art classic like "The Scream" but... Do you even like it? Let us know! And while you're at it, throw up some pictures of your favorite pieces of art. We'd love to see them!

Top Opinion
-
NarcolepticGoat 2012/05/03 19:46:46Yes
More polls by SodaHead News
Sort By
- Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/08 20:59:08

reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/08 23:33:37
+1Aeeeiiiiiiiii! It's Hel-lo Kittieeeeeee!reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/09 15:14:22
+1
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/09 21:15:31
+1Uh-oh! Now it looks like Bart Simpson must have broke into Susan and Mary Test's lab. (yes, I've watched that...)reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/10 18:14:51
+1Bart's grandfather slept through the whole episode.
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/10 18:25:04
+1Grampa dreams of the maaaany maany movies he's seen in his time.reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/10 18:32:53
+1
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/10 18:45:32
+1Tickles my inner fur ball.reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/10 20:17:31
+1
reply - jade Incognito 2012/05/08 20:28:28
+2can't stop staring at it hahareply - Incognito jade 2012/05/08 20:56:40
+2A bit creepy, huh?
reply - jade Incognito 2012/05/08 21:35:30
+1haha nice .Love the glassesreply - Incognito jade 2012/05/09 15:19:23
+1Check out this brave dude.
reply - jade Incognito 2012/05/10 08:23:15
+1HAHAHA where are you finding all these lolreply - Incognito jade 2012/05/10 18:19:17 (edited)
Through the SodaHead search for Godzilla photos.
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/10 18:47:12
+1Yo, I'm a star! Gimme 20 dollars if you want my autograph!reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/10 20:22:37
+1
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/10 21:59:20
+2Aside from the Incredible Shrinking Man those 1950's mutant monster flicks with giant bugs and lizards never unleashed a giant kitty cat on a major city. Wouldn't that be fun?
reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/11 18:12:11
+2Splendid....
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/11 21:22:24
+1The citizens of Tokyo say, "been there, done that."reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/14 15:14:52
+1
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/14 20:48:43
+1We must go to Monster Island and summon Mothra to save us from Godzilla Cat!
reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/15 15:39:38
Nowhere is safe with Godzilla cat.
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/15 20:17:17
+1Oh the humanity! Oh the mousedom!reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/15 21:10:01
Best to hunker down!
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/15 21:15:06
+1Godzilla down! This looks like a job for King Kong!
reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/21 15:26:42
+1It is going to be a showdown!
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/22 00:13:59
+1Oh great! Now we gotta worry about Kitty Kong!reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/22 14:44:11
+1Not to mention, King Kong is in love.
reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/23 05:45:38
+1Talk about a memorable first date!reply - Incognito Soundstorm 2012/05/23 18:46:54
King Kong used to be downright scary, but now he has turned into a kitten.
reply - EdVenture 2012/05/07 01:51:01Yes+1Must have been painted after a republican was elected.reply
- Dan EdVenture 2012/05/07 06:14:12
+2makes no sence tbh lol.reply - Soundstorm EdVenture 2012/05/08 19:40:44
+1A statement on our PRESENT times.reply - RICK 2012/05/07 00:41:58No+2I just dont get art.Im not impressedreply
- Vipor_GG 2012/05/06 23:54:13No+5It's awful! Even this is better!
reply - johnnyg Vipor_GG 2012/05/07 19:35:56
+2120 million??reply - Incognito Vipor_GG 2012/05/07 21:25:53
+2Or how about this...
reply - Vipor_GG Incognito 2012/05/08 00:13:15
+1That's better too.reply - Soundstorm Incognito 2012/05/08 19:37:10
+1Could that be.....(gasp!) A missing Rembrandt?!reply
«« First « Prev
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
17
Next »
Last »




















