
Draft Dodger, Racist and Drug Addict Rush Limbaugh's FOURTH Marriage Is On-The-Rocks. Rave If You ARE NOT Surprised.
Draft Dodger, Racist and Drug Addict Rush Limbaugh's FOURTH Marriage Is On-The-Rocks. Rave If You ARE NOT Surprised.
Trouble in heaving-fat-goat paradise? According to Your No. One News Source for Political Marital Disharmony and John Edwards Babymama Travesties, yes!RUSH LIMBAUGH MARRIAGE ON THE ROCKS modestly whispers the National Enquirer headline on its miserable website. And insiders inside it say beloved bride Kathryn is ready to walk! Oh nooooo, Rush! Oh nooooo!
It seems Kathryn Rush is not taking too kindly to being snubbed and lambasted by everyone she’s ever met for being bound in holiest matrimony to a sweaty, loathsome, snorfling, terribly inelegant and not-nice! person like Limbaugh, who of course apologized for “those two words” — slut and prostitute — but not the idea behind them, namely that every woman to come of age since Griswold v. Connecticut is doing sex for money, on her back. (Perhaps in Rush’s experience this has been true?)
She’s furious at the 61-year-old conservative firebrand and threatened to walk out of their marriage if he keeps up his trash talk, say insiders.
[...]
Rush’s big mouth has caused a rift in his fourth marriage, and sources say he’s now running for cover from 35-year-old Kathryn, a Florida event planner.
[...]
“Kathryn is fit to be tied,” said a pal. “She feels as if she’s being tarred and feathered with the same brush that people are using on her husband. She really let him have it.
“She said she’s become a social pariah because of his hot-headed, heedless comments and warned him in no uncertain terms that he’d better keep his trap shut and stop using words like ‘slut’ for any woman!”
Read More: http://wonkette.com/467152/rush-limbaughs-hot-35-y...
Top Opinion
-
FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX 2012/07/09 22:25:24All of the above






















By the way, we liberals don't come running like the Patriot Seal people do when the call is put out by one of their troll masters to attack and attempt to annihilate the opposition. Or is that just one more thing you tend to overlook because of your own bias? I stand by my comment in it's entirety.
"First-year cost is highest for the pill-$172, compared with $160 for the diaphragm and $131 for the IUD. The mean of $154 for these three prescription methods is almost four times the mean first-year cost of $40 for condoms and foam." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
If you add up all the first year costs of all contraceptives it only equal $503. Fluke said she paid 5 X's that amount. That's a lot of contraceptives!! I'd say, if the cost estimate is correct, the circumstantial evidence is there to support Fluke is a sex addict.
If circumstantial evidence can be so widely applied to Rush, I think it's only fair it be applied to Fluke as well.
There were cheaper alternatives, you chose some of the most expensive BC pills out there...that was a personal choice. When you are paying for it yourself most people are more frugal and informed than when a third party insurance (especially govt run) pays it for you.
That is my argument against the whole idea of health insurance (except for catostrophic care) in general. We'd all be better off being first hand consumers of our health care costs - that is what would bring down the ridiculous cost of healthcare as we'd shop for the best care/costs we could find and the market would answer with lower costs. This would also create a better informed public.
A thousand dollars a year for BC is a stretch and exaggeration or proof of a distrubed personality.
Your logic button is stuck on off.
Fluke was testifying in support of the mandate which stipulates that all providers of insurance - employers at the onset but that was modified to read all insurance plans - must provide contraceptives at no cost to the insured. No out of pocket, no co-pay.
You are displaying the typical trait of liberals - lack of common sense. Who do you think end up paying for all those "free" contraceptives for "entitled" women like Fluke? Do you think the insurance companies will eat the costs? Hardly. The costs will be passed on the public - many of whom have objections to the morning after pills that are part of the mandate.
It's really sad that you libs have so tenuous a grasp of economic reality that I would even have to explain that. You seem to honestly think that anything you deem "altruistic" or worse yet "fair" costs nobody anything.
Sandra fluke? No copay is fine with me and MOST women would say hallelujah !
Your a typical whiny conservatard. Always bitching that someone, anyone is getting something that you can't have. Always resentful of
others, but always willing to keep your foot on the necks of others to maintian your primacy when the actuality is that the country is changing .But you'll hold on to your idiotic traditions and scream bloody murder all the way to the end because you can't take even one foot out of the past.
Than God, people like you are dying out and the next generations are
taking over to advance the country into the future. I could care less about your judgement of liberals . Most of your economic reservations are nothing but self induced hysteria. Every time anyone proposes change you crybabies pull the same stunt and scream socialism and rant and rave about how the country will be bankrupted. You did it with Social
Security, Medicare, Unemployment insurance, SNAP and every other progressive idea that's ever been proposed. You only delay the inevitable, you only win battles, we a...
Sandra fluke? No copay is fine with me and MOST women would say hallelujah !
Your a typical whiny conservatard. Always bitching that someone, anyone is getting something that you can't have. Always resentful of
others, but always willing to keep your foot on the necks of others to maintian your primacy when the actuality is that the country is changing .But you'll hold on to your idiotic traditions and scream bloody murder all the way to the end because you can't take even one foot out of the past.
Than God, people like you are dying out and the next generations are
taking over to advance the country into the future. I could care less about your judgement of liberals . Most of your economic reservations are nothing but self induced hysteria. Every time anyone proposes change you crybabies pull the same stunt and scream socialism and rant and rave about how the country will be bankrupted. You did it with Social
Security, Medicare, Unemployment insurance, SNAP and every other progressive idea that's ever been proposed. You only delay the inevitable, you only win battles, we always win the war . That been the history of American politics for a Century now and you Cons are too illiterate to even see it. So go fight you losing battles while we liberals save the country like we always do in the face of resistance from backward thinkers like you.
In case you hadn't noticed SS, Medicare Unemployment and every other big time socialistic program IS GOING BANKRUPT!! What makes you think Obamacare is going to be any different. Oh sorry, "think" is too strong a word for you emoters.
But, you are right about one thing, those who wish to bring us closer to a collectivist society instead of one that respects and honors personal freedoms and responsibilities has definitely been winning the war. I just don't know what great prize you think you will have won when you finally reach your goal.
As far as the SS is concerned, the CBO projections are based on the projection of a stable economy. Since we are on the brink or hyperinflation ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com... per your very own liberal rag, The Huffington Post) - stability is about to fly out the window along with all present projections.
The "locked box" of SS has been pilfered, purloined, pinched and pirated to pay for all the other entitlements you libs hold so dear. The only way your beloved social programs will survive is if each of us, our children and their children agree to work for nothing for the rest of our lives. Hell, they're half way there now. I pay 47% of my income in taxes to federal, state and local government as it is and you libs still want more from me and the other middle class to upper middle-class Americans. Your mentality is "that's what you get for being successful".
The fact is the voracious and insatiable appetite of an ever expanding govt will demand everything - because IT MUST to survive.
Like I say, you don't value your personal freedoms, so you deserve to lose them.
I do value my personal freedoms, that's why I'm not going to allow Conservative Nazis like you to take them away from me. You don't give a damn about anyone's civil rights you only care about your personal finances and that's it. You will do and say anything to justify your idiotic ideology and stay true to it's purist dogma to protect yourselves--not freedom , or the Constitution. I don't even believe you people are Americans. I think you're the grown up version of the pods from Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
vicious Cons attempt to perpetrate onto those you want to subjugate to your miserable dogma. And you act as though you are actually surprised how much people hate conservative's guts. Obliviousness? Or pretense?
Have a nice life Joseph.
Do you really think that simply because you think something is good or "fair" that there is no cost attached? Who do you think will end up paying for the cost of the "free" contraceptives Fluke spent over $3000 on? Do you think the insurance companies will eat the cost? Hardly. They will pass it on down to every policy holder who - once ACA is fully implemented - will be THE PUBLIC! How sad is it that I have to spell that out for you?
BTW, classical liberalism - before it turned to progressivism - was a political ideology that advocated limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, individual liberties including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets. Conservatives now hold these ideologies while the Democratic Party has enlisted itself in 'social liberalism' which emphasizes the collective over the individual.