Not really. Only if you live in a swing state.
I do and I plan to vote.
I am non-union so I will only be voting once.
Does Your Vote Matter if You Live in a Red State or a Blue State?
Chris D
2012/08/08 18:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
675 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
365 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
740 votes
|
|
42% | |||
Every presidential election year in recent memory comes down to the same crucial swing states: Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Colorado and Nevada... give or take a state or two.
I live in California, so I don't think it really matters who I vote for because the Democrat will almost always win, due to California being a blue state. Of course, I always do vote because it's my civic responsibility, but does it really even matter if you live in an entrenched "red" (Republican) or "blue" (Democrat) state?
CNN.COM reports:

I live in California, so I don't think it really matters who I vote for because the Democrat will almost always win, due to California being a blue state. Of course, I always do vote because it's my civic responsibility, but does it really even matter if you live in an entrenched "red" (Republican) or "blue" (Democrat) state?
CNN.COM reports:
The CNN Electoral Map is CNN's best estimate of the key states that will likely decide the 2012 presidential election. The map will be updated as the campaign progresses. Use the map to predict which candidate will win each state and see who reaches 270 electoral votes first.

Read More: http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/ecalculator#?batt...
Top Opinion
-
Heisenberg 2012/08/08 18:03:02





















Here in California, well we allowed the Purple party to create what is called an "Open Primary", so we will never see a third party in the General election ever again, we will only have a choice between a Democrat or a Republican, don't let your States do what ours has done, STOP open primaries!!!
You want Early Voting? Fine, we go with the Afghanistan method, you stick your finger in a black dye that does not wash off for weeks! You want an electronic voting machine?? Fine, print me a receipt that I can review and place into another box as backup (and don't tell me the machines cannot do it, I've used ATM machines for years not that print a copy of the check I deposited!!!). You want a to vote by mail??? Fine, you have 729 days between elections to get a freaking ride to the elections office to prove you are alive, prove your address is legitimate and show some dam ID!!! If you fail to do so, you must vote in person at the next election. Lastly, if you are one that says we should not show ID to vote, you are obviously a person that does not participate in society at all, (i.e., cash a check, get a job, use a credit card, etc) and shouldn't probably be deciding elections....
I live in Texas, where we haven't voted for a democrat since 1976 when Jimmy Carter ran.
Why should I even vote, when for the past 3 decades of elections the state always goes red?
It would make some sense if they divided electoral votes based on the popular vote in the state, but no it's winner take all. Everyone who voted democrat, your vote DOES NOT count.
Take California in 2004 (more of an average election than 2008). There were 16.5m registered voters but only 12.4m people voted. The D's won with a difference of 1.235m votes and had 54.4% vs 44.4% for R's. While there was actually only a very small difference between registered D/R voters and total votes for D/R, it is safe to say the 3m undeclared voters also contributed proportionally to the outcome. Therefore, take the 4.1m non-votes and you have a very powerful number. Apply the same proportions and you have 1.8m potential Red votes (and likely more due to lack of motivation in a solid Blue state keeping more R's at home). That is enough to take the state and the 55 Electoral College votes that go with it. Dont join the non-voters - it is possible to make a difference if you GET OUT AND VOTE!
The same can obviously be said for the other side but they wont be any more motivated until they realize they can actually lose an election. Until then, every R that votes is a vote that counts! Also, California has only been Blue for 5 presidential elections across 4 candidates. Before that, it was usually a Red state.
Voting itself, however, matters, in the sense that it's currently the only real way to hold our elected officials accountable.
Btw, Illinois is a swing state? Maybe in 1960, but not for the last twenty years at least.
Now I feel even more compelled to vote, knowing that the economic elite's corporate political propaganda machine is spewing hateful partisan ugliness intended to compel the most informed in the population to get too disgusted to vote and to cause extreme un-bridgeable positions so as to paralyze We the People and government from making true and meaningful change.
I call on the young to rise up, register to vote, run for office, organize around free internet resources and win without the corporate money. These actions would make money useless as to elections. We old farts are too comfortable in this environmentally failing world, take over before it is too late, please, I implore you!! Please join me in this cry!
Capitalism is your enemy, and unless you are already rich, it always will be; inequality is INHERENT(built in) to this false competitive dichotomy.
But most of you won't understand what I'm saying and prob think I'm some sort of commie or socialist-lazy-hippie whatever...however, I do think capitalism was a natural culmination of trade in general and although a huge/difficult learning lesson; it was necessary like all things are via their natural cumulative evolutionary learning process.
But, like all major "trends" Let's hope it doesn't kill most or all of us on it's way out.
We need to level the playing field so us little guys can compete with the corporate giants. We need a new form of Capitalism, check out RMI.org and Natural Capitalism, this may be an option to consider. The banks do us more harm than the standing army, which also robs us of our vitality.
Yet we live in a competitive nightmare of obsolescent profit incentives and "break it to fix it" abhorrent corporate warfare that saturates at least 99% of all aspects of life. As long as the driving force is basic inequality in order to create the leverage of mass control to the irresponsibility of corrupt and immoral business...there will be NO fixing something that was never meant to work for E-V-E-R-Y-O-N-E in the first place...
DO YOU ACTUALLY THINK THEIR ARE ANY DEVELOPED ((AND)) MOST UNDEVELOPED NATIONS THAT ((DON'T)) USE MONEY?!?!
Are you like a day old? Because it sounds like you were born yesterday to make such an absurd statement!
What an absurd phallic debate to try to have with such a POOR person like me. LOL!!
You are a financial slave telling another financial slave to "Do something about it or GTFO", how very red-neck marine of you, do you live in a trailer and hope George W, runs again as well? Just curious...
I don't care if it takes 2 months to count the votes we need paper ballots. Id should be required to vote. There's sooooo much more to fix this situation.
About the I.D.s, if there is real proof that it is an actual problem I will agree. Let's get to the truth, if it needed, then provide a free and easy means by which legitimate voters can get them. The old and poor often do not have drivers license, no car, no need.
Full version once you get with it:
My feelings on voting, if it mattered it would be counted and do good than harm which is what it has been for the sea of people. If voting did any good, it would be illegal to the elite who would rather own you and slowly kill you off. That is the truth we all are running away from.
So now they can run false ads and report lies for profit. They now take the license granted by the public, for free, to profit off corporate propaganda, to weaken the electorate for a profit
That is when ignorance became point of view.