Does the Mitt Romney economic plan designed to affect other countries economies more than our country economy?

Well Romney's Company Bain Capital put the jobs in china

With as little as you know about what is going on IN this country you want to expand into foreign affairs??

so I can be just like Romney

He knows quite a bit more about everything compared to you!

Plan?

HE,HE I went to look at Obama's budget plan and budget for the last 3 years.The only thing I could find is that the Senate voted it down 98-0 twice.Is that not laughable?So I guess he couldn't do a budget and gave up.

Mitt Romney were he to become President and the Romney/Ryan budget plan were enacted they'd all be considered traitors to their countrymen in my opinion.

I couldn't really conclude any specifics from the Romney/Raynd joint town hall yesterday. It really kind of sounded like an infomercial at 4am. However, I have this sneaking suspicion that if they do in fact take over, It will be more of the same. The only difference I potentially see is a whole bunch of people on this site suddenly being in favor of the exponentially rising debt. But at least Grover will have a warm body to hold the pen.

In a riveting interview on CNBC, legendary investor Jim Rogers warned Americans to prepare for "Financial Armageddon," saying he fully expects the economy to implode after the U.S. election.

Rogers, who for years has been an outspoken critic of the Feds policies of "Quantitative Easing," says the world is "drowning in too much debt." He put the blame squarely on U.S. and European governments for abusing their "license to print money." In the U.S. alone, the national debt has surged to nearly $16 trillion, that's more than $50,000 for every American man, woman and child.

"[They] need to stop spending money they don't have," Rogers said. "The solution to too much debt is not more debt... What would make me very excited is if a few people [in the government] went bankrupt..." Rogers added.

Rogers also charged Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel with promoting dangerous policies that create the illusion the economy is stable... but are really only intended to buy time before their upcoming electionshttp://moneymorning....

Don't get me wrong, I'm not opposed to auditing the Fed. Personally, The only difference I see between The Federal Reserve and a run of the mill counterfeiter, is that the Fed gets away with it. I just find it ironic that it's Mitt Romney, who is indignant about showing his finances, wants to accuse the Fed of shady fiscal practices.

He showed what was required by law.Which any fool in America would do.If he had done anything wrong ,you would know.So why are you buying into this bs about taxes.Let's talk about Obama's record.

I don't believe Mitt broke any laws. Like I said, I find it ironic that he wants to audit the fed. I don't know where you've been but we've been talking about The Presidents Record. Why don't we also talk about Romneys Record as well. Not about his taxes, not even about Bain, But why not His time as MA Governor.

Go ahead .I haven't heard anything bad about his time as governor.Matter of fact you lib's ought to like him for that screwed up healthcare law he gave them.

47th in job creation, under his reign. And the only reason why his unemployment % went favorable was because people were leaving the state. But I'll give you credit where it's due. He did inspire Obama care. At least you're willing to admit it, which is more I can say for Romney.

He might have inspire Obamacare which you can look at two ways.Obama had to copy Romney so there is another idea he stoled and screwed up.Or Obama just plained screwed up.
A campaign ad that praises Mitt Romney’s performance as governor of Massachusetts presents a slanted view of his record on jobs, unemployment and taxes. To every claim, there is a “yes, but” qualifier.
■The Romney ad claims that as governor, “Romney had the best jobs record in a decade.” Yes — Massachusetts added more net jobs during Romney’s four years in office than during the four-year period of either his predecessor or successor
■The ad claims Romney “reduced unemployment to just 4.7 percent.” Yes — Massachusetts’ unemployment rate went from 5.6 percent to 4.6 percent under Romney

The Romney campaign bases its claim on the fact that during Romney’s four years in office, Massachusetts added a net 49,100 jobs (an increase of about 1.5 percent). In the four years under Romney’s predecessor, Republican Jane Swift, the state added 19,000 jobs (an increase of 0.59 percent). In the next four years under Romney’s successor, Democrat Deval Patrick, Massachusetts lost a net 66,400 jobs (a decrease of 2.03 percent).
OUCH

There is a third option. The President saw that Romney's Health care plan seemed to work and was popular in Massachusetts. And thought, It may work on a national level.
Sure it's the state that presents a slanted view on Romney's performance, I'm sure his Presidential ad campaign isn't distorting the truth one bit.

Either way he screwed us.

I admire your optimism Romeny/Raynd will screw us further than Cheney/Bush could ever dream of.