Does The 2nd Amendment Protect The Individuals Right To Own Any Gun Or Weapon They Want ?

yes, and military weapons being legal does not mean every single psychopath or gang banger has one. Flamethrowers are unregulated, why are they not used in crime? because it is an expensive piece of equipment and has no practical criminal use. Tanks, Helicopters are legal, but if completely unregulated they would be obviously really expensive too so nothing would change. Machine guns are cheaper but still too expensive for many criminals, criminals do get full auto mac10s (cheapest full auto on the market) but the market price is too high for most criminals to buy them. The point is people can have military weapons and still live in a free and safe society. its win/win. The founding fathers were fine with people having military weapons, muskets were usually too inaccurate for hunting and sport use, but muskets had the advantage of firing faster than rifles. Most civilians of the day did not have cannons, but the government did not restrict the private ownership of them. Common people could own warships if they wanted to, people were free to do so. The other thing is the founding fathers would have not restricted weapons because it might make people safer, the murder rates were high back then. Mainly this was because of the culture back then where if you did not accept a duel, you were a coward. The second amendment boils down to resisting tyranny because, If the government breaks the constitution what is supposed to happen? you can't really believe the government would never violate the constitution, what is the "or else" if the government does not follow?

It does in fact say that. But it says arms. I have always taken that to be small arms. As in hand guns, or rifles and shotguns. Any and all law abiding citizens I think follow that pursumed premise. It does not state Revolver, Pistal, Rifle, or Shotgun. nor does it say anything about Semi-automatic, Single shot, Bolt action, Pump, or full-auto. Nor does it give any restrictions as to capacity of the magazine, clip, or anything else.

Anybody who has the common sense to own a gun, more often than not follows the law. and they know that we are not allowed to have fully automatic guns. Its against the law. And those of us who follow the law, do not normally go looking for rocket launchers, or hand gernades, and flame throwers. That is ludercause to say the least. And the cosmetic make up of a gun or rifle does not mean it should be illegal to own or carry. Nor should the capacity make any difference. Legal gun owners do not use a gun for anything but self defense, and recreation. And using one for recreation is not part of the second amendment. If you hunt, target shoot, those are secondary uses of any gun.

We have thousands of gun laws, even every state, and like our President, each state and local government, picks and chooses whic of any of them the will enforce. And instead of enforceing those laws. We choose to write more, and make them more restirctive, and to make criminals out of those who own guns legally and as is our right. And ignore those who use guns illegally, and holding them to account. But our President and all the other Liberals and Progressive Communists want legalize Illegal Aliends, and make criminals out of the law abiding.

And who are you to make the decision for me and all the other legal gun owners, as to what kind of gun we choose to use for our self defense, and to fullfill our Constitutional Right. And who are you to tell us what style it is, or what capacity it shold hold?