Quantcast

Does Obama have it BACKWARDS, by exporting jobs and importing illegal aliens?

tncdel 2012/06/26 14:06:27
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Obama has imported no jobs for our out-of-work citizens, yet has outsourced millions of jobs to China, etc. And also outsourced over 3 millions more jobs RIGHT UNDER OUR VERY NOSES, by issuing over 3 million work visas to foreigners.

Plus last week Obama unconstitutionally issued 800,000 work permits and de facto amnesty to ILLEGAL ALIENS. And that was on the heels of last year also giving another 300,000 work permits to illegal aliens.

See:

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/warning-obama-issues-ex...



http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/is-it-fair-that-obama-i...



http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/obama-brags-about-creat...



http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/should-obama-have-by-pa...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Waldorf 2012/06/26 19:27:10
    NO [explain why you think not].
    Waldorf
    +1
    Obama does not seem to think in terms of borders or national sovereignty. After all, he supports the new world order, globalism, and Marxism. He also blithely dispatches drone attacks into any countries he wishes.
  • whitewulf--the unruly mobster 2012/06/26 18:59:57
  • SJG 2012/06/26 16:32:23
    NO [explain why you think not].
    SJG
    The only thin backwards here is your post!
  • frank 2012/06/26 16:23:11
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    frank
    +2
    Sure looks like it; why else would he sue States for enforcing the law.
  • stormy rae 2012/06/26 16:15:05
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    stormy rae
    +2
    everything he does anymore is a contradiction and conflict of established law in our country, he rewrites it in form of E.O. and only some realize they dont have to uphold his E.O.'s as law. Outsourcing jobs and increasing the pop makes sense especially since his goal is to keep the pop pacified and dependent on The Obama minted money
  • Savious 2012/06/26 15:43:58
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    Savious
    +1
    This has been a problem not just under Obama’s administration, but stretching back several administrations. NAFTA was the beginning of the end for the US manufacturing economy.
  • Kane Fernau 2012/06/26 15:07:50
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    Kane Fernau
    +2
    The President should put country before party
  • RED DAWN Kane Fe... 2012/06/26 16:17:41
    RED DAWN
    +3
    The president puts obama before anything.
  • frank Kane Fe... 2012/06/26 16:21:59
    frank
    +3
    He should but do you think that will ever happen? I don't.
  • schjaz 2012/06/26 14:55:14
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    schjaz
    +2
    yep...that's one way to put it.
  • SteveMarine- JLA 2012/06/26 14:48:46
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    SteveMarine- JLA
    +4
    But to Obama thats how it should be.
  • CAPISCE 2012/06/26 14:47:36
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    CAPISCE
    +2
    Obama was born Ass Backwards worst
  • ☆ElenaDiamond☆ 2012/06/26 14:45:06
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    ☆ElenaDiamond☆
    +4
    Obama has done so much backward it is pathetic. Obama doesn't mind if Border Patrol people get killed because of his fast and furious program, but murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent babies is acceptable. What would you expect. Ship jobs out, and bring illegals in to do the jobs that we actually still have in this country. Pathetic example of a President.
  • CuppaT Child of God 2012/06/26 14:39:54 (edited)
    NO [explain why you think not].
    CuppaT   Child of God
    +1
    I think someone needs to research the history of outsourcing. Why are you blaming Obama? It's been going on for a very long time - long before he hit the political scene. I personally think the American public is to blame. If all jobs that are now being done overseas were brought back to this country, how many U.S. workers would be willing to work for the pittance that those people in the poorer countries are being paid. And just how much do you think you would pay for any product that is manufactured overseas if it were made here and people were paid what they demanded (I know - a run a words)?



    And similarly, how much do you think the cost of produce would be in your local supermarket if it weren't for the immigrants (legal or illegal)? Would you be willing to pay $10 a pound for tomatoes? I think not.



    I would love to see outsourcing stopped. However, until the American is willing to work for less, it will never happen. I get very frustrated when I call a company with a question and get someone from India or the Phillipines. I can barely understand them and they can barely understand me. Usually I hang up and my question goes unanswered. I sometimes feel that this is what the corporations want. Let them produce shabby products and then not have to answer to the American consumer for their inferior workmanship.
  • Savious CuppaT ... 2012/06/26 16:10:35
    Savious
    +1
    There is another solution besides American’s working for less; it’s CEO’s and Managers working for less, and owners and stockholders taking less profit. I by no means promote a communistic system; and really want less government interference on individual companies; but our current system is doing nothing but promoting the diminishing middle class.

    Free trade, does not equal fair trade; in the US, you have EPA, OSHA, Minimum wage, Dept of Labor, SS tax, etc etc… all these things add to our base line cost. By bringing items in from countries which do not have these things, our manufacturing jobs cannot compete. To make matters worse; other countries are making products with less and less quality; forcing our consumers to purchase items which they’ll have to replace in a relatively short period of time.

    All of this allows employers to maintain low wages, because people buy cheap crap made from other countries. However, if someone couldn’t survive on say $10/hour, they wouldn’t take that job. They might be unemployed for a period of time; or take multiple jobs making less than they can survive on; but they would be constantly seeking better employment. Which would force the employer to pay the employee more, in order to maintain their employed force. Would some pass this cost...



    There is another solution besides American’s working for less; it’s CEO’s and Managers working for less, and owners and stockholders taking less profit. I by no means promote a communistic system; and really want less government interference on individual companies; but our current system is doing nothing but promoting the diminishing middle class.

    Free trade, does not equal fair trade; in the US, you have EPA, OSHA, Minimum wage, Dept of Labor, SS tax, etc etc… all these things add to our base line cost. By bringing items in from countries which do not have these things, our manufacturing jobs cannot compete. To make matters worse; other countries are making products with less and less quality; forcing our consumers to purchase items which they’ll have to replace in a relatively short period of time.

    All of this allows employers to maintain low wages, because people buy cheap crap made from other countries. However, if someone couldn’t survive on say $10/hour, they wouldn’t take that job. They might be unemployed for a period of time; or take multiple jobs making less than they can survive on; but they would be constantly seeking better employment. Which would force the employer to pay the employee more, in order to maintain their employed force. Would some pass this cost on to the consumer, absolutely, but I imagine some would also cut into their own profits slightly, to reduce their cost, to ensure their product sells.

    Also, this whole argument about increased wages would cause astronomical increases in the product is pure BS. I grew up on a farm, I know what goes into picking tomatoes, and I also know how long it takes to pick them when you’re not screwing off. Say an average worker can pick 2 tomatoes per minute, one every 30 seconds (which I might add, my father would of whooped my rump for picking that slow), and you are paying them $4/hour to do so. That would mean, his cost would be $0.03 per tomato. If we increased his salary to $20/hour, his cost would increase by $0.14 per tomato. The other day, I bought some tomatoes for $0.89, if you passed every cent on to me, I would of paid $1.03, which is far from the $10 per pound, and very affordable to a person who is making a decent living. And, I am sure, you could find an American to pick tomatoes for $20/hour.

    The fact that this is even being debated is a prime example of how our economic system is off key. Henry Ford said, your employee needs to be paid enough to buy your own product; and that is where we’ve screwed the pouch in recent years.
    (more)
  • JCD aka... CuppaT ... 2012/06/26 16:45:25
    JCD aka "biz"
    +1
    Germany has strong unions, fairly high wages, universal health care and a welfare state - and they are the world's second-largest exporter.
  • JanHopkins 2012/06/26 14:36:29
    NO [explain why you think not].
    JanHopkins
    +1
    He works for the corporations. How can anyone deny it?
  • Lanikai 2012/06/26 14:34:14
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    Lanikai
    +4
    Communists normally DO have it backwards.

    He is doing what his backers and his BLT people and the muzzies he loves WANT him to do, destroying Americas economic viability vy removing our manufacturing jobs and base and importing millions of Hamas, Palestinian, mexican/latino welfare dwellers to SUCK the remaining life out of the republic.
  • wolf sloan 2012/06/26 14:29:09
    YES, Obama has it BACKWARDS [tell us why you think so].
    wolf sloan
    +4
    Old school math here, more people minus more jobs = high unemployment.
  • Reichstolz 2012/06/26 14:18:40
    NO [explain why you think not].
    Reichstolz
    +4
    The progressives have always relied on government dependence to sway people to their ideas. In a robust economy there big government stance, has no place. So logically they must keep the GDP growth down to remain in power. To further that end sending brain dead jobs out of the nation and allowing brain dead illegals to stay he is building the next dependent voter block for the dependency party.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 06:02:49

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals