Does he have the Catholic vote after what Obama said yesterday?
Sister Jean
2012/05/10 19:26:12
|
|
|||||
|
39 votes
|
|
35% | |||
|
39 votes
|
|
35% | |||
|
34 votes
|
|
30% | |||
no UGLY remarks or you'll be blocked
Top Opinion
-
Batman 2012/05/11 00:53:28yes





















No practicing Catholic would support Obama after that drivel!
I MEANT TO SAY YES !
Most recently Public Religion Research Institute found most Catholics favor either allowing gay and lesbian people to marry (43%) or allowing them to form civil unions (31%). Only 22% of Catholics say there should be no legal recognition of a gay couple’s relationship.
Then again there are those driven by doctrinal fear of condemnation. It's a toss up really.
Obama's catholic which surely... Must count for something?
I think it will be tight because of Southern Catholics tending to tow the line of less government/religious freedom/pro life/anti change.
But the moderate Catholics who tend to interperate the bible in a different way on issues and realise the leniency within biblical text on modern issues will vote Obama.
I'm pretty sure the Evangelical vote is Romneys simply because of their stance since the 70's as a church that marriage is between a man and a woman and the stance of most on anti abortion.
Too many people are posioned into believing that being a Christian and a social conservative are mutually exclusive, they're not.
The whole ideals on social issues evolved specifically in America in the south in the 20th century, until that point protestants were of the view that modern issues can be evolved within the bible.
Pretty sure Obama's got the Atheist vote tied up, Romney probably has the creationist vote tied up as well - all one of them - so the real battle ground is appealing to casual christians and minorities in the north.
Sister Simone Campbell Fires Back At Vatican Criticism
The head of a Catholic lobbying group is fighting back against criticism from the Vatican.
"I've no idea what they're talking about," said Sister Simone Campbell told the BBC. "Our role is to live the gospel with those who live on the margins of our society: the hungry, the poor, the ill. That's all we do."
Campbell was responding to charges that her group, NETWORK, is engaging "corporate dissent." The Vatican ordered an investigation of U.S. nun group Leadership Conference of Women Religious and its ties to NETWORK, who supported President Obama's health care reform push. The Vatican accused the Leadership Conference of promoting "certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith."
Campbell told the AP that she believes the link between the crackdown and the health care reform support is clear.
The Vatican "clearly got upset that we were effective at communicating our views politically," she said.
She also told the BBC that "there's a strong connection. We didn't split on faith, we split on politics."'
To watch more of her comments, head over the BBC.
http://www.huffingtonpo...
Sister Simone Campbell Fires Back At Vatican Criticism
The head of a Catholic lobbying group is fighting back against criticism from the Vatican.
"I've no idea what they're talking about," said Sister Simone Campbell told the BBC. "Our role is to live the gospel with those who live on the margins of our society: the hungry, the poor, the ill. That's all we do."
Campbell was responding to charges that her group, NETWORK, is engaging "corporate dissent." The Vatican ordered an investigation of U.S. nun group Leadership Conference of Women Religious and its ties to NETWORK, who supported President Obama's health care reform push. The Vatican accused the Leadership Conference of promoting "certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith."
Campbell told the AP that she believes the link between the crackdown and the health care reform support is clear.
The Vatican "clearly got upset that we were effective at communicating our views politically," she said.
She also told the BBC that "there's a strong connection. We didn't split on faith, we split on politics."'
To watch more of her comments, head over the BBC.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
And the right to marry is barred in the majority of States.
And there is no recognition of same-sex relationships in Louisiana. I bet there wouldn't be a gay pride parade if their relationships were acknowledged by the state...
Men who love multiple women and the women who love them back can't have a polygamous marriage either. Marriage is an arrangement legally defined and regulated state by state. Marriage is also a sacrament in many religions. If the religions or the states decide to redefine marriage, I wouldn't agree, but I couldn't do much about it except move into a state that recognizes marriage as I do.
Still, most states won't stop same sex couples from cohabiting and many won't stop them from having children or buying a house. As for some of the issues regarding end of life and health insurance, those could be handled legally or by finding a job with an "enlightened" employer. If gays have a higher actuarial risk of health problems (not saying they do) than hetero couples, would they find it unfair to have to pay higher premiums for insurance coverage? Why should heteros, if that is the case, be forced to subsidize the bad results of choices they don't even agree with?
Polygamy, in my opinion, should be legal as well. I don't really give a crap about what people's personal lives are like.