DOCUMENT: OBAMA PAID DUES TO JOIN SOCIALIST NEW PARTY
STEVE
2012/06/09 21:02:21
|
|
|||||
|
4 votes
|
|
36% | ||
|
2 votes
|
|
18% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
45% | ||
Barack Obama's involvement with Chicago's extremist "New Party," online literature from the Party likely reveals that the young state senator not only was a member but had to commit financially to membership.
On Thursday, Kurtz announced the discovery of new documents that supported his original claim. In particular, he found minutes of a 1996 New Party meeting which read:
Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.
Top Opinion
-
AND, IF YOU FOUND OUT HE HAD REGESTERED WITH A SOCIALIST GROUP, WOULD IT MAKE...
+3You Bet Your Ass It Does! and to more and more Americans who are finally realizing what his "change" to America really meant..Socialism! Beware 0bama, the sleeping giant is awake and engaged..and coming for you and your ilk in Nov.
However the new Party was far from "radical" or "extreme" and they were not "socialist"
they were farther right than even the Green party, and where tied to the Dems
essentially they were to Nancy Pelosi what the Tea Party is to John Bohner
but dont realize what they'll loose ,,,rights / freedoms ...
I had a debate with some one who said SO WHAT ,,,THATS WRONG WITH SOCIALISM ?
now this is proof of the mind set of an indoctrinated individual ....
soooooo......???
"literature from the Party likely reveals"
'likely'
could just as easily say
"likely doesn't reveal"
I have higher expectations for you.
Buzzfeed's Ben Smith now concedes that Barack Obama sought the socialist New Party's endorsement in 1996--but continues to give Obama, and the New Party, the benefit of the doubt on whether Obama was in fact a member. While admitting the Obama campaign misled the press and the public about the New Party, Smith continues to let the campaign get away without comment--when, in fact, David Axelrod responded yesterday.
Granted, Axelrod's response was to claim that he had "no idea" about the New Party--but that is almost certainly a lie, given that he controls Obama's image tightly, and given that the campaign targeted the New Party allegation as a "smear" in 2008. It is widely known that Axelrod micromanages his candidates' speeches and biographies, and there is almost no chance he has "no idea" about Obama's New Party ties.
I am not informed enough on anyone's campaign to make factual statements. We are talking politics btw, so it's pretty hard for anyone to make a factual statement.
But thank you for following up and adding some meat to your argument.
I'd give ya B+
[Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined.]
my daughter is only 30 and she has more smarts !
thank god ...
you just come out of the parents basement ?
and am hepling take care of My inlaws ..
so EXCUSES ////EXCUSE !
and you have been subliminally programmed ..it shows ,,some can spot the mentality a mile away ....I only get SNAPPY WHEN SOME CALLS A STUPID REMARK !
and am hepling take care of My inlaws ..
so EXCUSES ////EXCUSE !
and you have been subliminally programmed ..it shows ,,some can spot the mentality a mile away ....I only get SNAPPY WHEN SOME CALLS A STUPID REMARK !
see this started out as me making a stupid yet funnyashell mistake and then making fun of myself for doing so. Schlaue got it. You, not so much. You can spot the mentality a mile away, but you can't see if for what it is.