Quantcast

Do You Think Working at Ground Zero Caused This Guy's Cancer?

SodaHead News 2011/08/01 14:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Stop me when this story starts to sound absurd. After nearly a decade of fighting, Congress finally passed the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund in January, providing for health care monitoring and financial aid to workers who became sick after working on the toxic pile of burning materials at Ground Zero.

True story, the bill does not include coverage for cancer. But that's not why Ground Zero worker Edgard Galvis was a bit surprised recently when he finally received a compensation check for his work on the pile – for $0.

According to The New York Post, cancer-stricken Galvis, 51, a Queens native who suffered from sinus problems and throat cancer after months of removing toxic debris from the World Financial Center, was excited to get the check following a court settlement with Merrill Lynch, whose offices he had cleaned.

His settlement was for $10,005, but once his lawyers carved out $2,579 for un-itemized legal expenses, then snatched another 33.3 percent for their fee ($2,124), $352 in fees for the lawyer who referred him and $4,950 for unspecified "liens," there was, literally, nothing left.

Galvin, who is jobless and $30,000 in debt, told the Post he thought the final amount was repayment of the workers' compensation for aid. The father of two lives with his fiancée and her two children and relies on relatives to pay his rent.

In April 2010 he was offered $10,000 to settle from a law firm that warned that going to trial could end up costing him $100,000, so he took the $10K.

"I think they are taking advantage of the ignorance of people such as myself," he said.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Tea in the Harbor 2011/08/01 18:48:57
    Undecided
    Tea in the Harbor
    +7
    It shouldn't matter, he put his life on the line for his country in a time of national emergency, and now needs help in an emergency of his own.

    If we turn our backs on him and others like him, we just plain suck as a people.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mickeyva maxlaboy 2011/08/01 20:03:10
    Mickeyva
    I hope so.
  • Andy 2011/08/01 16:21:14 (edited)
    Yes
    Andy
    The way I understand cancer... we are born with a genetic trait to cancer. Something then sets it off...environmental, diet,stress/emotion, injury. This answers the question..."why do some get cancer and others do not when they were both exposed to the same toxin?" The chemicals, burning trash, asbestos... set off the cancer. Who knows, the guy may have been infected with Stage One or Two cancer at the time of 9/11, and with medical tests it was discovered. We will never know.

    Regarding Lawyers... doing the right thing, or always being right... guess again. Lawyers will work to 'take as much as they can' as dead people don't pay bills. Especially those whom are sick, as they have big $$ bills to pay!! Also, in a legal matter one side wins the other side loses... so lawyers are going to be 50% wrong!! Amazing this last fact is not usually discussed.
  • Max 2011/08/01 16:11:21
    Undecided
    Max
    It's too bad he couldn't represent himself and avoid a thieving lawyer. Who knows, if working at the 9/11 site caused or contributed to his cancer.
  • maxlaboy Max 2011/08/01 16:52:18
    maxlaboy
    +1
    What the article does not tell you is that 250,000 were exposed to the toxic mix of 9/11 WTC smoke/dust. 70% - yes seventy percent - of everyone exposed is ILL. Many with cancer. In my opinion it is better to pay for 1 case that might be in doubt than to allow more deaths to happen. Over 1000 people have died of WTC toxins in the past 10 years and more than 600 are from CANCER.
  • moonchild 2011/08/01 16:11:20
    Yes
    moonchild
    And these lawyers are scum for profiteering off of 911 and it's continued victims.
  • Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2011/08/01 16:02:02 (edited)
    Yes
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +2
    First I must say that it is a disgrace that congress require these people to be screened as terrorists for half baked healthcare coverage.



    The towers were full of carcinogens like asbestos. Unless it can be proven otherwise I would say its reasonable to believe that the government - especially the CDC is responsible (especially after the CDC lied about the air being safe after 9/11).



    As a side note, Silverstein was so lucky. He would have had to of paid hundreds of millions of dollars to clean up that asbestos if it was not for 9/11 dumping it all into the lungs of those rescue workers and residents.
  • enaud Dan ☮ R... 2011/08/01 16:44:22
    enaud
    On your side note: The thought now is not to disrupt the asbestos, so unless they were remodeling, cleaning the asbestos would not have been done. Asbestos takes literally decades to cause lung cancer (mesothelioma).
  • COMALite J Dan ☮ R... 2011/08/01 18:48:38
    COMALite J
    “First I must say that it is a disgrace that Congress require these people to be screened as terrorists for half baked healthcare coverage.”

    The real disgrace is that they had to be shamed into doing that much for them by Jon Stewart (of The Daily Show), of all people!
  • Hawkeye 2011/08/01 16:00:34
    Undecided
    Hawkeye
    Don't know.. I'm NOT a Doctor..

    I DO know that the holdup in Congress was because of the PROPER and Legitimate concern that anything they might do in this regard might have adversly effected the court cases..

    THAT was the position of BOTH the Republican Congresses and the Democrat one..
  • Rob 2011/08/01 15:48:32
    Undecided
    Rob
    I think that the cancer probably caused his cancer, but I'm not a doctor. As the compensation, that was disgusting. Those lawyers should be ashamed of themselves. The article seems to focus more on his compensation or should I say lack of compensation.
  • Luke 2011/08/01 15:47:57
    Undecided
    Luke
    It sound like the lawyers need to be looked into. Un-itemized legal expenses and $4,950 for unspecified "liens," ???? Liens against what?????? Sounds like he was screwed big time. I'd want a detailed account of charges and see how fast the numbers change....
  • SkittleE 2011/08/01 15:47:35
    Yes
    SkittleE
    +1
    I read toxic materials and months of cleaning-yeah, I think it caused it.
  • freebirdie 2011/08/01 15:41:42
    Undecided
    freebirdie
    +2
    I remember the controversy as this was happening and I knew at the time that this would cause more trouble. Remember the "air quality" situation and people (mostly firefighters and rescuers) refusing to heed those warnings because, darn it, there were people that needed to be saved? They stated they didn't care, they were going to find their fellow man. Wonderful sentiment and mostly prideful, but that should've come with a sign off--no lawsuits! and Enter at your own risk. But they were getting paid to take some risks, and only with the proper equipment. They have rules for risk and they broke it. Sorry, I am not too sympathetic with the rescuers health plight (the ones that went in after). They heard the risks and didn't follow the protocol.
    This story seems to be yet another enemy victory.. lawyer greed.
  • davidl 2011/08/01 15:29:26 (edited)
    No
    davidl
    Queens native? Now. Citizen? Don't know, but at the time he was an illegal alien.
  • maxlaboy davidl 2011/08/01 16:54:09
    maxlaboy
    so that means his cancer was NOT 9/11 related???
  • davidl maxlaboy 2011/08/01 17:15:46 (edited)
    davidl
    I did not comment on whether or not he had cancer, did i? But you are right, I need to comment on the context. My opinion is that had he not been here illegally, then none of this would have happened ... so it was a direct consequence of his actions.
  • maxlaboy davidl 2011/08/01 17:28:02
    maxlaboy
    You selected NO to the question - that indicates you do NOT think it is 9/11 related.
  • davidl maxlaboy 2011/08/01 17:57:20
    davidl
    If they had an UNDO button, I would have voted undecided. I am not a MD, and certainly did not read all the case files. As such I am not qualified to make a medical judgement.
  • MinorKey 2011/08/01 15:16:27
    Yes
    MinorKey
    the whole building was lined with asbestos because there was no idea it was harmful when it was being built and to remediate (remove and replace) all of that would have been far more expensive than the building was likely worth. All that grey dust that covered people on 9/11 was a large number of things floating in the air and a part of that was asbestos.
  • Wahvlvke 2011/08/01 15:13:22
    Undecided
    Wahvlvke
    +1
    Who knows...but I'll bet he went after all the high pay and overtime he could get. How far does this thing go? Where is his union health care plan?
  • Quietman ~PWCM~JLA 2011/08/01 15:12:23
  • maxlaboy Quietma... 2011/08/01 16:54:43
    maxlaboy
    I hope you are being sarcastic
  • The Logical Canadian 2011/08/01 14:47:11
    No
    The Logical Canadian
    Uh.... what
  • maxlaboy The Log... 2011/08/01 16:55:07
    maxlaboy
    did you mean to say no? do you think 9/11 cancer is a myth?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 06:26:25

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals