Quantcast

Do You Think the U.S. Should Stop Deporting Young Immigrants? (Obama Does)

SodaHead News 2012/06/15 23:15:45
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Barack Obama made headlines Friday as he stated that his administration will no longer deport young illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. when they were children. His announcement, as expected, was met with part-joy and part-skepticism -- as well as a heckler who constantly kept interrupting the president as he spoke.

"These are young people who study in our schools, they play in our neighborhoods, they're friends with our kids, they pledge allegiance to our flag. They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper," the president said in his speech Friday morning. But he was also quick to add that this is not a permanent answer. "This is not amnesty. This is not immunity. This is not a path to citizenship... It's not a permanent fix," Obama said. Do you think the U.S. should stop deporting young immigrants?

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Darth V... Nuke 2012/06/16 08:41:03
    Darth Vader.BN-0
    But you speak of whats fair? That makes them any better because there were no laws? They killed for land, we lose jobs. If they were forced to be here by their parents, yes its very fair. Do you know What they will have to go through anyway? Saying that they should be deported because of there parents faults is idiotic.
  • Nuke Darth V... 2012/06/17 03:17:34
    Nuke
    No, what's idiotic is that you don't seem to understand that there are people who wait years to be here legally and then all of a sudden someone who breaks the law gets to cut in front of everyone else...
    What if you were waiting to get a car, you spend a lot of money to hold that car on the lot, wait years just to have ownership and then someone steals the car and the police say that it's their car and they get the car before you do.
    If people want in this country they need to abide by the rules like everyone else, you don't reward illegal behavior, it's a shame the kids have to pay for the parents mistake but there are lots of families waiting to be in this country, people with kids and I think those people should be rewarded not illegals.
    I don't know how you don't get this...
  • Darth V... Nuke 2012/06/17 07:18:32
    Darth Vader.BN-0
    .....
  • Wyveryx Darth V... 2012/06/17 06:43:54 (edited)
    Wyveryx
    The problem with what you're saying is that you're going back in time and trying to hold our ancestors accountable for what we do today.
    We have become a sovereign nation, with laws set in place to protect not only its citizens, but also those seeking refuge here.
    If we allow a specific group to bypass laws that we hold not only our own citizens, as well as legal immigrants to, then what does that show to those who seek to bypass those laws?
    In reality it shows them that doing something illegal can be rewarded, and it might just carry over if they do make it here.
  • Darth V... Wyveryx 2012/06/17 07:22:06
    Darth Vader.BN-0
    But everyone else is? Why can't I? Here's a thought, don't blame out lack of security on children. What kind of nation does THAT make us?
  • Wyveryx Darth V... 2012/06/17 08:48:15
    Wyveryx
    Why you? Because you are the one responding to this particular thread based off my initial comment.
    As far as lack of security, I blame that on the government that's supposed to be in place to protect its citizens. I will also blame the children because there is no excuse for ignorance of the law. We can't be subjective on who the law applies to simply because of their plight otherwise the law holds no authority and neither do the people who enforce them.
    By upholding the laws that this nation has founded, in a fair and just manner, that makes us a compassionate and structured nation. We are not saying that we refuse immigration, we are just saying that we refuse "illegal" immigration. Many other nations take the same stance as the U.S., the only difference is in enforcement.
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/16 08:08:33
    Kibbles
    DO you know how tough it is to come here legally, my stepfather has been trying for five years and a couple thousand dollars now and he's no closer to becoming an american citizen then you or I are to becoming Mexican citizens.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/16 08:25:17
    Nuke
    So this should prove to you how unfair it is to let illegals cut in line then because he's waiting and some illegal jackass gets to cut in line before your stepfather who's actually trying to do the right thing...
    I think it should be easier to become a American citizen but because illegals make it that much harder on everyone, there are a lot of legal immigrant citizens who need jobs right now like every American does and what does Obama do? try and give special rights to people who are breaking the law.
    Tell me, doesn't it piss you off that illegals are just cutting in front of your honorable Stepfather when he should be the one getting to the front of the line?
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/16 08:53:12 (edited)
    Kibbles
    +1
    Rather it makes me think the illegal took the better option.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/17 03:19:00
    Nuke
    That's the problem, we need to reward people like your stepfather and kick these illegals out for breaking the law, it should piss you off that illegals are stealing your stepfathers right to be here, that's what you should take away from this.
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/17 04:28:53
    Kibbles
    Sadly, I have seen what ti was like when he was illegal and living with us, everything was easier even if he can be a strict man. Now that he has to stay in Mexico my sick mother is alternating with living her a few days of the week and living with him on the small farm he tends to. I know what it was like for him to be illegal, truth be told I think it would be simpler on my mother he just hopped the fence again. You're right I should feel some form of indignation but I don't. All that goes through my mind is "Hey good for them".
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/17 04:59:50
    Nuke
    +1
    I know it should be easier for immigrants to come here legally, I'm all for immigrants coming here because they're some of the hardest working and patriotic Americans, they don't take this country for granted.
    It saddens me that this country is rewarding illegal behavior and doing nothing to help good people who're actually working trying to get here legally.
    If we actually enforced the laws and made it easier to gain access to be here it would make it easier on everyone, try to remember that it's because of crap that's going on with illegals that they're getting a cut in line before those who actually deserve to be called Americans like your Stepfather.
    We need change and it's not amnesty, it's better handling of incoming soon to be new Americans, This would be a much better country if our immigration laws were not only enforced but our immigration policies changed to make easier access for those longing to be here legally.
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/17 05:10:59
    Kibbles
    Correct you are because as is, it seems to be cheaper and faster to get into The United states illegally rather than legally.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/17 22:28:04
    Nuke
    That needs to change because it pisses me off that people are working their ass off to get here and someone can just come in and jump the line ahead of those waiting.
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/18 07:09:12
    Kibbles
    It is annoying to say the least but problem is that that would require a total reset.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/18 07:33:22
    Nuke
    perhaps but then again amendments haven't stopped the Government before, I'm sure there can be something done so that you wouldn't have to scrap everything, we just need better enforcement of the laws on illegals that we don't seem to be enforcing, if that were to happen I think it would start being easier to let legal immigrants in.
    I might be wrong on that though.
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/18 12:10:07
    Kibbles
    Who knows, at this point we just found out recently his case has been pushed back another ten months. This doesn't help my faith in the legal immigration system.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/18 22:46:35
    Nuke
    I'm sorry to hear that, our government is too stupid. :| ugh
  • Kibbles Nuke 2012/06/19 08:25:03
    Kibbles
    We could be good but many things need to be fixed first.
  • Nuke Kibbles 2012/06/19 20:38:49
    Nuke
    It really is unfortunate that this country isn't doing anything to really fix anything.
  • Wyveryx Darth V... 2012/06/16 22:48:28
    Wyveryx
    +1
    no, you should put me at fault for whatever laws that I broke;regardless if I knew of them or not.
    If citizens are held accountable for laws they didn't know about, then so should illegal immigrants.
  • redhorse29 2012/06/16 06:24:21
    Yes
    redhorse29
    +2
    I support Obama. Keep the children here, take them legally from the parents and ship the illegal parents back to their country. The Feds will make better parents by providing healthcare, nurturing, education, vacations, etc. at tax payer expense. This is a natural extension of the nanny-state.
  • Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/06/16 06:17:34 (edited)
  • Common Sense Conservative 2012/06/16 06:05:28
    No
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    If you're an illegal then you should not only be deported, you should have to walk your way back, in shackles, picking up trash on the way.
  • Kibbles Common ... 2012/06/16 08:09:05
    Kibbles
    +1
    Now that is excessive and ridiculous.
  • Common ... Kibbles 2012/06/16 19:07:07
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Is it?
  • Magnus ... Common ... 2012/06/16 20:11:25
    Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮
    +1
    That's how they came here in the first place, only littering instead of picking-up the trash, and without the shackles because they weren't CAUGHT BREAKING THE LAW at the time. 'Excessive'... LMAO! Ahhh, looks like all the propaganda is working...
  • Kibbles Magnus ... 2012/06/16 21:41:37
  • Magnus ... Kibbles 2012/06/16 22:18:36 (edited)
    Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮
    +1
    And the pot calls the kettle black! Matter of fact I have educated myself. I have read our Constitution (Article 1, Section 8 - Powers of CONGRESS "To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization") and I have read our Section 1325 in Title 8 of the United States Code "Improper entry by alien":

    (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection;
    misrepresentation and concealment of facts
    Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States
    at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
    officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration
    officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
    States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
    willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first
    commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or
    imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent
    commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or
    imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
    (b) Improper time or place; civil penalties
    Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to
    enter) the United States at a time or place other than as
    designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil
    penalty of -
    (1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or
    ...






















    And the pot calls the kettle black! Matter of fact I have educated myself. I have read our Constitution (Article 1, Section 8 - Powers of CONGRESS "To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization") and I have read our Section 1325 in Title 8 of the United States Code "Improper entry by alien":

    (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection;
    misrepresentation and concealment of facts
    Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States
    at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
    officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration
    officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
    States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
    willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first
    commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or
    imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent
    commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or
    imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
    (b) Improper time or place; civil penalties
    Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to
    enter) the United States at a time or place other than as
    designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil
    penalty of -
    (1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or
    attempted entry); or
    (2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of
    an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under
    this subsection.
    Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not
    in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be
    imposed.
    (c) Marriage fraud
    Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the
    purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be
    imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than
    $250,000, or both.
    (d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud
    Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise
    for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws
    shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance
    with title 18, or both.

    It is not my opinion, it is the FACT, it is THE LAW.

    Perhaps you should do the same. But then I guess that would violate the "do as I say, not as I do" clause by the brainwashed masses advocating for the complete and total usurpation of this Nation's laws, especially those concerning our Constitution. Congress is our Legislative process (to which is the reason that we even have a Congress with REPRESENTATIVES for U.S. CITIZENS (NATURAL-BORN OR NATURALIZED - there's that NATURALIZED term again), so that they can serve the will of the majority of We The People), NOT 0bama and his powerless Edicts. The Constitution does NOT grant the Executive Branch ANY power over Immigration, much less for POTUS to usurp itself or our Legislative Branch through the issue of ILLEGAL EDICTS!

    And 0bama knows this but went ahead and attempted to do it anyway!:
    (more)
  • Kibbles Magnus ... 2012/06/17 04:32:47
    Kibbles
    You know what, I could fight you with the constitution but that would be pointless. I've seen the face of illegals, you people who think the'ye criminals don't have any idea how terrible it can be. Next time maybe before you want to deport the illegal get to know them first,
  • Magnus ... Kibbles 2012/06/19 00:57:49
    Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮



    Yes, WONDERFUL people. Listen here, I went to the California public school system... I know EXACTLY what these people are like and they are NOTHING like the rosy people you seem to think they are. NOTHING like that. There were at least five violent fights BEFORE LUNCH every single day between these illegal kids, them ganging up on us whites, or up on the blacks, and I see what they're doing to my State and Country. The only thing that they want is AMERICA TO BECOME MEXICO - they would NOT be burning our flags and telling us all to go #uck ourselves and etc. etc. etc. if they really wanted to assimilate as Americans. They do not belong here, they need to keep all of their trash at home south of our borders! Unwanted, unwelcome, stay the #uck out!
  • whigamore Magnus ... 2012/06/18 18:00:46
    whigamore
    "The Constitution does NOT grant the Executive Branch ANY power over Immigration, much less for POTUS to usurp itself or our Legislative Branch through the issue of ILLEGAL EDICTS!"

    Actually, he (POTUS) has the Constitutional power to grant COMPLETE amnesty to the WHOLE LOT OF THEM if he so chooses.

    Like every President before him, he has the legal power to override the justice system, release anyone he chooses from imprisonment or from paying a fine, or from deportation, and return that person to a state of innocence as though he had never committed a crime.

    In the United States, the pardon power for federal crimes is granted to the President of the United States under Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which states that:

    “The President … shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.”

    The Supreme Court — in accordance with its own Constitutionally granted powers (like it or not) has interpreted this language to include the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, commutations of sentence, conditional commutations of sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites and, yes, AMNESTIES.

    "Offenses against the United States" includes Immigration offenses, of course.

    Moreover, the...

    "The Constitution does NOT grant the Executive Branch ANY power over Immigration, much less for POTUS to usurp itself or our Legislative Branch through the issue of ILLEGAL EDICTS!"

    Actually, he (POTUS) has the Constitutional power to grant COMPLETE amnesty to the WHOLE LOT OF THEM if he so chooses.

    Like every President before him, he has the legal power to override the justice system, release anyone he chooses from imprisonment or from paying a fine, or from deportation, and return that person to a state of innocence as though he had never committed a crime.

    In the United States, the pardon power for federal crimes is granted to the President of the United States under Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which states that:

    “The President … shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.”

    The Supreme Court — in accordance with its own Constitutionally granted powers (like it or not) has interpreted this language to include the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, commutations of sentence, conditional commutations of sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites and, yes, AMNESTIES.

    "Offenses against the United States" includes Immigration offenses, of course.

    Moreover, the power to do this is plenary. That is, it is complete and it is his alone. The president isn’t required to explain or justify his actions to you, to me, to Congress nor, for that matter, to anyone else .The power to pardon (or grant amnesties) is solely at the discretion of the president, and cannot be reviewed or overturned by any of the other branches of government.

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    (more)
  • Magnus ... whigamore 2012/06/19 01:10:17
    Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮
    Read it in context and stop twisting it to imply what is clearly just not there:

    The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

    It is talking explicitly about soldiers and government officials, ambassadors etc. (basically, people working under or with the federal government) and NOT about pardoning a whole slew of another Nation's citizens (notice also, the clause of 'except in cases of Impeachment' - which Citizens cannot be subjected too, it does not apply to anyone and everyone! And did you just gloss over this part in Article 1, Section 8 (powers of Congres)? "To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization;" meaning exactly that, ONLY Congress! Pardoning foreign National citizens en masse would STILL not make them Naturalized Citizens! Even if it could, it would STILL be in violation of the Constitution because it granted ONLY Congress that power!!!
  • Common ... Kibbles 2012/06/17 03:37:23
    Common Sense Conservative
    So are you saying that many are less illegal?

    Brilliant!!!
  • Common ... Magnus ... 2012/06/17 03:32:56
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    Yessir
  • Kibbles Common ... 2012/06/16 21:43:32
    Kibbles
    Now as for you yes that is excessive, should Native Americans try something like this then, imagine how pissed off you would be. Or perhaps if you were black imagine someone white would do this, would you be fine with that?
  • Common ... Kibbles 2012/06/17 03:38:37
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    I would be 100% fine with it if ANYONE were ILLEGAL.

    How tough is that for you liberals to understand?
  • Kibbles Common ... 2012/06/17 04:31:07
    Kibbles
    Okay pick up those chains and start walking and picking up the trash, I'll meet you shortly. You feel about yourself, now we're both being deported.
  • Common ... Kibbles 2012/06/17 06:27:56
    Common Sense Conservative
    +1
    I have news for you pal, my ancestors came here legally, unlike the ones in question.

    Brilliant!!!
  • Kibbles Common ... 2012/06/17 06:41:45
    Kibbles
    Whom were your ancestors.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 07:39:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals