Do you think the people who always put down Mitt Romney for having money are probably jealous?

He produced staples for one. I don't know what a "dis" is.

I can't hear so your video does me no good.

He created many companies.

The only thing destroying the Middle class is Marxism.

A dis is a typo. I edited it so you can understand it better. You really should have someone translate the video for you. Especially before you vote for that scumbag Draft Dodger.

Ron Paul 2012

First of all Ron Paul won't be running. I know a lot about Romney.

I was an international cost accountant. I did the numbers that caused many financial decissions including shipping jobs overseas.

But if you asked a lay person why companies ship jobs overseas, they would probably tell you the cost of labor is cheaper. While that is one factor, there are hundreds of factors and labor cost are measured by productivity.

You have emotions and then you have facts. Romney is one smart person. He knows exactly what will get investors to invest in America and create jobs.

First you had better get your "facts" straight and not cloud them with emotions from supporting a liberal (yes more liberal voting record than Obama check those facts), flip flopping Draft Dodger.



Paul is twice as smart as Romney is, and something Romney isn't. Ron Paul is an expert on global economics. He has a solid plan that will work unlike Romney. Paul will get our "LIBERTY" back the past two administrations have robbed from us.

I can't listen to your video because I can't hear. I have already told you that but you put up another video.

Paul woudn't have a prayer against Romney in creating jobs!

Global economic knowlege is not what you need. You need a president that understands how to get investors to invest so they will create jobs. You need someone that understand businesses and the people that create the jobs.

What is killing job creation today is the uncertainty of what Obama will do. Investors hate uncertainty. How would you like to make an investment that you thought would cost so much money and Obama comes out with a regulations that cost you way more?

You are missing the point still. Romney doesn't have a chance against Obama winning the election.

Look at history It will take an EXCEPTIONAL candidate to beat a sitting president. Romney falls far short of that qualifier. The last Republican to defeat a sitting president was Ronald Reagan. He was the only Republican to do so in the 20th century.

Nominating a crappy candidate will only guarantee Obama 4 more years. Haven't you learned your lesson from 2008?



“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.” Albert Einstein

How do you think nominating someone WORSE than McCain will beat him?

Do the math there are more Democrats than Republicans Romney will need to get Independent and Democratic votes to win, he will also need the "Paulbot" votes.

He will get very little Independent and Democratic votes because he is a douche bag and a DRAFT DODGER (no mulligans for that one).

He will get no support from the "Paulbots" due to the election fraud and shabby treatment by the Romney campaign & GOP.

You don’t understand the basic. Paul couldn’t win his home state of Texas. Paul isn’t in the running.

Each country has a playing field for investor to invest and create jobs. The more investors will play on the countries filed, the more Federal tax revenues the country will receive. Plus the more jobs they create while playing on the field the more revenue the government gets.

Investors and corporations have the choice of any country’s field to play on.

Naturally, there are costs in the form of taxes, regulations, and etc. Romney clearly understands that basic principal. However, he knows what to do to entice investors to play on the US field.

Toss away the emotions and get with the facts. Romney can create jobs because of his knowledge. You work in emotional mode.

The nomination isn't final until the RNC. You Obviously don't know the process very well. There is nothing to listen to in the second video I shared with you it proves Paul is in "the running"

I thought you'd be getting back and saying "you were right on the voting record claim" by now. Obviously you don't mind voting for another liberal to screw things up even worse.

Where is Romney's plan?

Paul has a doable plan that will balance the budget by year three and spells it out here.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/th...

Romney couldn't make a pimple on Ron Paul's ass when it comes to economics and thinks the FRAUD being perpetrated by the privately owned "Federal Reserve" bank is OK and Ben Bernanke "is doing a good job".

Look at ALL the facts not those you pick and choose.
You work in this mode.

You used the fallacy of shooting the messsenger because your not capable of arguing with me. Of course, a fallacy is breakdown in logic. Any third grader can post a picture. I slammed you facts.

I understand the process perfectly, Romney has enough votes to win on the first ballot.

Economically you don't have a clue.

You need to get rid of your emotions and use some facts.

You are not capable of arguing period. You can not counter the facts I presented to you logically or address the issues I've brought up.

You wouldn't know a fact if one came up and bit you on the ass. Because several just did and you won't admit it.

Romney's not going to win, if he does we are DOOMED.

Quote one of your facts.

Below is a fact!

The people voted and Romney won enough delegates to take the nomination on the first ballot

What part of that don't you understand?

You need to understand the process.

The delegates are not counted till the RNC dumb ass.

I see your back into 3rd grade name calling mode. However, name calling is way below my intelligence level. Apparently, you think it works for you.

Delegates are required to vote for the candidate they are obligated to on the first vote. Gringrich can give his delegates to Romney on the first vote.

Here are the facts. Paul couldn't win Texas in the primaries, his home state. Romney, Santorium, and Gingrich had no problem winning their home states. Only Paul had a problem.

You need to get rid of your emotions and understand the facts.

Romney couldn't win in Massachusetts. Obviously politics are above your intelligence level. ALL delegates to the RNC are UNBOUND.

http://www.examiner.com/artic...

The RNC is not going to go against the will of the people. Romney represents the will of the people.

You need to get real. Paul has no chance against Obama. You believe in crap. He wouldn't win any state.

Trying to do tricks is crap. Romney is the nominee and he will win by at least 52-48 over Obama. Personally, I think it will be 53.5 to 46.5.

Don’t you think the RNC understands your argument? They know that many delegates want to vote for Paul. It isn’t going to happen.

The voters clearly want Romney. I think Paul finished third in the vote.

Once again, obviously politics are above your intelligence level. Now you are sounding like a retard. "I think Paul finished third in the vote."
Try using facts instead of your "feelings".

And once again, Do the math there are more Democrats than Republicans Romney will need to get Independent and Democratic votes to win, he will also need the "Paulbot" votes.

He will get very little Independent and Democratic votes because he is a douche bag and a DRAFT DODGER (no mulligans for that one).

He will get no support from the "Paulbots" due to the election fraud and shabby treatment by the Romney campaign & GOP.

Due to BLATANT election fraud ballot stuffing and last minute rule changing the GOP will no longer have a choice of what to do except play by their own rules or face Federal Election Fraud charges.

We won't let you fu*k things up again like you did in election 2008.

Romney will be the nominee. He was chosen by the people. There aren't going to be any games at the convention.

Personally, I don’t think Paul would allow it. He has a lot of integrity. It would destroy not only Paul but also his son.

I think this is the least of the Republican worries.

Romney is should be the biggest Republican worry because NOBODY I know will vote for him.

I'm sure I'm not alone on this position.

Stubborn people that lack vision like yourself will be what puts the final nail in the Republican coffin.

Let's try facts.

The primaries are over, Romney won. Paul couldn't even win his home state of Texas.

FACT#1:
The Nomination is picked by the delegates at the RNC

FACT#2:
You support a candidate that can not beat Obama

Fact#3:
You let liberal media pick him for you.

Number 2 is certainly not a fact.

Number 3 is bunch of crap.

At least you picked an appropriate avatar a "flushing toilet swirl" is appropriate for the crap you spew.

Let me slam with a fact. Paul couldn't win his home state of Texas. Romney trounced him on his home turf.

Let me slam you again with another Fact. The primary is over and Romney won the popular vote by a wide margin.

You’re making assumptions which are breakdown logic. There isn’t going to be any problems at the Convention. Romney will be nominated on the first vote.

Paul Trounced Romney in Massachusetts the state he governed with the 47th worst job creation record while Romney was governor.

Why do you support someone who's voting record is more liberal than Obama's?

Romney won all the delegates and 72 percent of the popular vote against Pauls 10 percent. Paul got slammed in Massachusetts like everywhere else.

http://elections.msnbc.msn.co...

His record isn't more Liberal than Obama's. Your spewing crap.

Romney trounced Paul in his home state of Texas..

You watch far too much TV to be informed in the world of politics. Ron Paul won a MAJORITY of the delegates there.

You should quit while you're behind.

You can not answer a simple question.

Why do you support someone who's voting record is more liberal than Obama's?

I slamed you with a reference. Provide a reference that Paul won MA. You can't!

http://elections.msnbc.msn.co...

You question was a fallacy, you assume that Romney's voting record is more Liberal then Obama's.

Provide fact but you can't! You need to produce facts not crap.

MSNBC LIES Your facts are CRAP.

Research their voting records instead of making a fool out of yourself and wearing out your "typing finger" here.

You are more clueless then I had thought.

Produce facts a quote and reference but you can't.

Marxist Liberals can't produce facts. They can spew accusation, fallacies, and personal attacks.

Come on Marxist, slam me with facts but you can't!

Name calling? You're lucky I don't report your ass.

If you are too stupid to look up their voting records, you need the practice.

It is public record. I'm not going to do the work for you, and it will keep you from being so annoying for an hour or two. If we're lucky.

You cut and run on my question.

Let me slam you again with facts. Paul didn't win a single state. You are flat lying.

http://www.realclearpolitics....

Go ahead and report me. I need a good laugh. Every thing you say is nothing but a lie.

I am done. I not listening to your crap anymore.

Sorry but Ron Paul does have more than a chance in hell to create MORE jobs than O'Romney.



We have an option, and this is it:

Romney won the popular vote and trounced Paul in Texas his home state.

Some people are like that with anyone who has money...let them suck socks!!!

Yup..

Ha. Great meme!

Class envy at its purest.

Class envy is very effective among the left.

It feeds into their prejudice and it helps them forget that the biggest billionaire scum bags in the world support the Democrat party.

They are either liars or stupid or both.

Not people, Libs!Romney earned his money .And I'm sure the taxes he paid on his earnings went towards the handouts that are given under Odumbo's socialist policies,as well as towards Odumbo's unearned paycheck.