Do you think that Obama is a bad person, or just a bad president?
☆ElenaDiamond☆
2012/06/24 23:22:43
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
2% | |||
|
33 votes
|
|
25% | |||
|
70 votes
|
|
53% | |||
|
27 votes
|
|
20% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Both a bad person and a bad president.+23He was nasty growing up, no self control so turned to drugs, is a constant liar and that's not because he's President that is a character flaw and his a Narcissist to the 10th degree.






















The amount of money 'subsidize' cost is minuscule. Congressional pay- miniscule. Do you want to achieve budget surplus? If so, you can either raise taxes or cut defence, social security and medicare.
That's clearly true. No other discretionary or non-discretionary spending can be cut enough to move the budget to surplus.
Of course, I don't think the government always needs to run a surplus. People don't always make more than they spend, nor do businesses- why should governments?
{a budget that the goverment MUST live within as I do >.}
So you have no mortgage? You're the exception. Most people have a huge amount of debt.
{that is WHY with people like YOU we are carrying a 16 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT}
No. The reason is bad policy by the Bush administration and the Bush recession.
Then you are lucky. Virtually everyone has a mortgage. Do you know why? Because sometimes debt is less bad than the alternative. Surprise! Debt isn't always a bad thing!
{How much aid is your country getting from the united States ??}
No money. How much aid is the US getting from my country? More than nothing. Actually, the US is a net recipient of foreign aid.
{I WANT THE SUBIDIZES TO "STOP" AND A BALANCED BUDGET ,and "NOT THRU TAXTATION OR CUTTING SOCIAL SERVICE}
That's a contradiction. If you want an immediately balanced budget, you want either tax increases or slashing social services. There is no other way to immediately balance the budget (other than ending all defence spending). That's simply true.