Do you think Ron Paul should talk to his followers now and explain to them that if they vote for him , they will be voting for OBAMA??

by hazel Posted 2012/07/08 23:20:27

Related Topics: Obama, Ron Paul, Car, Vote, Voting

75 votes
Read all 437 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Ron Paul please talk to your supporters about this	20 votes	27%
	I dont car I am gonna vote for Paul even if it means giving a vote to OBAMA	8 votes	11%
	I have a different answer	47 votes	63%

I feel that the Ron Paul supporters feel that if they vote for him it will show tehir support for him ...when in fact its like a vote for OBAMA ...i think RON PAUL knows this and has a big responsibility to tell his suporters this

+14

Add a comment above

BattleBattlerBenji (PHAET) 2012/07/08 23:41:57

I have a different answer

+24
Clearly you haven't quite worked out the concept of voting. If people vote for Ron Paul, they will be voting for Ron Paul.
>> See Replies

More polls by hazel

Sir Bud to Freedom... 2012/07/10 01:41:20 (edited)

Quoting you is self explanatory(Including the spelling mistakes);

"...the sad part is you don't have the intelligence to fiqure it out.."

"...Maybe your time would be better spent to get educated rather than just show your ignorence around sodahead..".

"..You just resort to name calling as most children do when they have no intelliegence about a subject...".
Irony pure.

reply
Freedom... to Sir Bud 2012/07/10 01:55:35 (edited)

+3
Is that the best you can do? Resort to attacking my spelling. LOL Just forget the fact your government is screwing you. The spelling is more important and attacking the messenger.
I do understand it doesn't feel good to be reminded that your being taken advantage of it doesn't make anyone feel good. Don't get mad at me, get educated and use that anger to stop this from happening to America and stop voting in what you fight against without any knowledge of it. Your problem is you decided to pick on the wrong person today with your nasty come backs and I just told the truth and took up for myself end of story.

reply
Sir Bud to Freedom... 2012/07/10 12:01:54

+1
Not attacking-just pointing out your hypocrisy regarding insults and intelligence, which either you don't want to see or are not able to due to being egocentric and narcissistic.But that's just my opinion.

reply
Freedom... to Sir Bud 2012/07/10 21:02:27 (edited)

+3
Why don't you take your own advice. You started this trying to be cute on this website. You get what you put out. If you have a opinion fine, but if you wanted to be RUDE and present no facts in a debate, start commenting with an attitude that is your problem not mine. I just did what anyone would do, put you in your place for your rude remarks end of story. Speaking of hypocrisy you like to dish it out, but can't stand it when it comes back to you is my point. I think you suffer from a double standard issue, One standard of rules for YOU and ONE standard of rules for everyone else. But that is not my opinion its a FACT you have demonstrated that by your comments its further documentation of that fact. As a matter of fact that has been your reputation on this website, many fellow sodaheads are aware of this when they encounter your rudness. So take some friendly advice clean up your own backyard before you start cleaning up your neighbors. So man up, look in the mirror and clean up your act and if you don't like my comment move on. Instead of constantly inflecting yourself induced illness of insulting others and then having the nerve to speak about the hyprocrisy of it all. WOW You may think that spin of BS works on other people but it doesn't work with me. As I said you, decided to pick on someone and you got back as good as you sent end of story.

reply
Sir Bud to Freedom... 2012/07/10 21:49:23

First you insulted and then complained of the same-end of story.

reply
Freedom... to Sir Bud 2012/07/10 22:32:20 (edited)

+3
Saving face again I see, that is your speciality on sodahead . Hummm. I see your not man enough, to man up it fiqures. I feel sorry for you, you will continue to repeat the same mistakes as it is further documented on sodahead.

reply
Sir Bud to Freedom... 2012/07/10 22:34:46

http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

reply
hazel to Freedom... 2012/07/18 23:42:33

+2
OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN

reply
Freedom... to hazel 2012/07/19 03:58:30

+1
That comment is so true, as he documents it with every comment he makes. LOL

reply
hazel to Freedom... 2012/07/18 23:41:30

+2
ALWAYS FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT FREEDOM MOM

reply
Freedom... to hazel 2012/07/19 03:42:21

+2
Thanks for your support dear friend.

reply
hazel to Freedom... 2012/07/19 04:50:58

+1
any time friend

reply
Freedom... to hazel 2012/07/19 05:39:46

+2
:)

reply
Dodgerfan 2012/07/09 07:43:59

I have a different answer

+8
A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama. The only choice we have is Ron Paul.

Why are you afraid of Ron Paul? If all the media says he has no influence then why are so many like you wanting him to give support to Romney? A vote for Romney is a vote for four more years of big government with no solutions to a sinking ship other than taking on more water.

reply
cddjmikey to Dodgerfan 2012/07/09 12:12:53

+2
Let's see if I can explain this in simple terms. Throughout the primaries Ron Paul has been getting about 10% of the vote, on average. In the general election that HAS to take it from somebody. Since Paul is closer to being a Republican it is easy to say that the majority of these votes will come from them. So he gets 10%, Romney gets 40% and Obama gets 50%. Since most states are"winner takes all" as far as the electoral college is concerned Paul just handed the election to Obama.

reply
gary to cddjmikey 2012/07/09 13:00:30

+5
vote mittens out, vote Ron Paul in.

reply
hazel to cddjmikey 2012/07/09 15:51:02

why is that so hard for them to see , its really quite simple

reply
Dodgerfan to cddjmikey 2012/07/09 15:52:16

+3
With the voter fraud, and yes I said fraud, Ron Paul received more votes than he was shown to have and that was with a tidal wave of misinformation by the media and the uninformed. Had he been allowed to speak in the debates without prejudice from the moderators he would have been the Republican candidate now instead of Romney who was preselected by Wall Street and the banks.

I am not a robot and am able to think for myself and I know voting for Romney is a waste of time and fuel going to the poll. If there were no way I could vote for Paul and there was a "NONE OF THE ABOVE" choice I would take it before voting Romney.

reply
Technot... to cddjmikey 2012/07/09 15:54:53

+6
You are under the misguided assumption that the elections were all legal and above board. The situation is now in the hands of a Federal Court to determine if that was the case. Since they have over 300 complainents, I would venture to say it was not.

reply
historian 2012/07/09 07:10:16

I have a different answer

+6
Ron Paul isn't the Pope. If he's not on the ballot I won't be voting for Obama or Romney whether Ron Paul came out and said he thought I should or not. I want to vote for Ron Paul, but if he's not on the ticket that doesn't make me set all my beliefs and convictions aside I would proceed to pick another candidate that best represents me, the Constitution, and what I think is the best thing for this country as a whole and the future of the children growing up now. I don't expect Ron Paul to come out and tell others how to vote. I think people that blame those who aren't enslaved by the two-headed globalist party system for their "team loss at the game" need to wake up to what elections are supposed to be about, and what a vote really means.

reply
historian to historian 2012/07/09 07:19:33

+3
Another thing to consider in all the tirades about "third party votes might as well be votes for Obama", how many are you convincing to actually vote for Obama by saying such a thing?

reply
Hawkeye to historian 2012/07/09 12:19:50

At THIS point if they vote Obama they were going to do so anyway.. I have LONG said that a good portion of the so called Ron Paul Movement were,, in FACT,, Obama supporters trying to replicate the elections of '92 where Perot split the Republican Vote and CLinton WON with only 43% of the vote..

reply
historian to Hawkeye 2012/07/09 18:21:11

+1
"At THIS point if they vote Obama they were going to do so anyway."- By the same logic, at this point if they're voting for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, they're going to do so anyway, so why throw temper-tantrums like little spoiled rotten brats who want to blame someone else for going poopy in your pants?

"I have LONG said that a good portion of the so called Ron Paul Movement were,, in FACT,, Obama supporters trying to replicate the elections of '92 where Perot split the Republican Vote and CLinton WON with only 43% of the vote.."- Do you have any idea how absolutely ridiculous this is? Why would they not simply vote for Obama instead of putting the votes into a third party and risk the Republicans pulling a win? There may have been some in the Perot camp that campaigned and pushed for people to vote for him with the intent of pulling Republican votes away, but that would pure speculation. It's always back to Perot when people want to excuse their being stuck in the false-choice of picking between one of the two, owned candidates of the two-headed globalist party. Have you considered that maybe people are just sick of being lied to, stolen from, having their unalienable rights illegally violated, their family killed in for-profit wars of aggression and globalization, etc?

I ...

"At THIS point if they vote Obama they were going to do so anyway."- By the same logic, at this point if they're voting for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, they're going to do so anyway, so why throw temper-tantrums like little spoiled rotten brats who want to blame someone else for going poopy in your pants?

"I have LONG said that a good portion of the so called Ron Paul Movement were,, in FACT,, Obama supporters trying to replicate the elections of '92 where Perot split the Republican Vote and CLinton WON with only 43% of the vote.."- Do you have any idea how absolutely ridiculous this is? Why would they not simply vote for Obama instead of putting the votes into a third party and risk the Republicans pulling a win? There may have been some in the Perot camp that campaigned and pushed for people to vote for him with the intent of pulling Republican votes away, but that would pure speculation. It's always back to Perot when people want to excuse their being stuck in the false-choice of picking between one of the two, owned candidates of the two-headed globalist party. Have you considered that maybe people are just sick of being lied to, stolen from, having their unalienable rights illegally violated, their family killed in for-profit wars of aggression and globalization, etc?

I can't speak for everyone who decides to vote for a candidate not endorsed by big financial backers, corporate propaganda, an ingrained power establishment, etc, but as for myself, I believe I'm as responsible for who I vote for as I would be if I stood up and said I endorse their actions and will be take responsibility for the good and bad that comes from my decision. I feel confident in putting that vote with Ron Paul, judging from his words and history. I feel confident, though less so, in putting my voice with Gary Johnson, because of his record and words. I can not say the same about Obama or Romney. It's voting -for- a candidate based on principle, honest assessment of their qualities, principles, belief in which candidate is a positive choice for this country, which may take the corruption and unconstitutional lawbreaking out of the executive branch, etc. I find the persecution offensive, but typical of a crowd that booed Ron Paul when he mentioned living by the Golden Rule.
(more)

reply
Hawkeye to historian 2012/07/09 19:06:30

+1
A very long and drawn out rant that means absolutely NOTHING in the political world.. Vote for Paul and say hello to four more years of Obama.. If you THINK that Obama and Romney are the same then I have nothing further to say to you.. YOU are beyond reason.. But I'll TELL you this.. If Paul causes the same thing to happen in November that Perot did in 92 then he's politically FINISHED just like Perot was in '92....

reply
historian to Hawkeye 2012/07/09 19:29:14

+1
"YOU are beyond reason."- Reason dictates my choice of who to vote for, rather than the fear and enslaved mind that picks between Obama and Romney because they're told they can't leave the "political world" fabricated for them.

reply
Hawkeye to historian 2012/07/09 19:38:08

+1
Blah Blah Blah.. Come TALK to me when Ron Paul becomes the President of these United States and TELL me THEN how reasonable you are.. THEN,,, I'll LISTEN..

reply
gary to Hawkeye 2012/07/09 20:22:28

the rhinos picked mittens now are comeing to see the end of their party. WHY O WHY DID WE PICKED MITT?

reply
Hawkeye to gary 2012/07/09 21:21:16

+1
Hey.. look.. I agree .. The Republican Party has lost touch with it's members.. I'm not happy with Romney and like MOST Republicans I wasn't happy with McCain either.. To tell you the truth.. I didn't much care for EITHER Bush and WHO the hell ever nominated Bob Dole for ANYTHING other then a COMA inducing medical aid..

But the FACT remains that ALL of them would have been better then the guy we have now..

If Ron Paul were the answer I would VOTE for him in a heartbeat but if this cadaver with the personality of a Zombie can't gain the support he needs to get nominated in his own party,, what HOPE does he have with Obama and the MEDIA that supports HIM???

They'd EAT him alive..

reply
hazel to Hawkeye 2012/07/18 15:06:38

Just now reading these posts...kudos to you big time

reply
hazel to Hawkeye 2012/07/18 15:05:28

i WAS JUST THIS MINUTE GOING TO POST" Can we say Ross Perot BOYS AND GIRLS"......HAWKEYE...What is wrong with these infected brains??

reply
hazel to Hawkeye 2012/07/18 23:44:43

EXACTLY and trying to tell the ross perot people was impossible also

reply
Hawkeye to hazel 2012/07/18 23:51:19

I don't know but I suspect that if looked into,, the insanity of the left would be found to have a direct correlation with the increased drug use in this country..

reply
Hawkeye to Hawkeye 2012/07/18 23:53:34

BTW.. I have said this before.. I believe that no less then half of those pushing for Ron Paul are Obama supporters.. As was the case with Ross Perot,, their goal is to divide the opposition to THEIR candidate..

reply
gary to historian 2012/07/09 12:24:08

+5
I'm voting for RON Paul, it goes to R.P.

reply
hazel to gary 2012/07/18 23:46:47

RP do you mean Ross Perot?? might as well same results

reply
historian to hazel 2012/07/19 01:40:46

The status quo lovers and zombie R and D voters love pulling out Ross Perot when they're running a terrible candidate and get angry at those who choose to vote a third party candidate that actually represents the beliefs of a large segment of voters. What part of voting for someone that doesn't represent you being a wasted vote do you not understand? Voting because of "group-think" or because of fear tactics and claims the sky is falling got old a couple of decades ago. They use those tactics on the simple minded or mind-controlled and gullible populace to continue to put in power those candidates that are bought off and continue to grow government, expand military across the world, involve our men and women in aggressive wars for globalization, raise spending, raise debt, raise taxes(hidden if not obvious), etc. If you keep voting in the way that continues the demise of the United States, you are the problem.

reply
hazel to historian 2012/07/19 03:15:20

It is truly hard to believe you are this lame

reply
historian to hazel 2012/07/19 03:16:29

Lame? It's hard to believe you and many others are so unthinking, gullible, and mind-controlled.

reply
hazel to historian 2012/07/19 03:20:46

AHH I THINK LAME IS STILL BEST FOR YOU

reply
hazel to historian 2012/07/18 23:43:59

You dont have to actually vote for OBAMA , YOU WILL BE HELPING HIM WIN IF YOU DONT FOR FOR SOME ONE THAT CAN WIN

reply