I believe the GOP could walk away with the 2012 election if they can manage their own candidates. Perhaps someone will enter the race and get the support of all the party at a brokered convention.
I cannot see Obama winning re-election in this awful economy and without the support of his base. Obama meandered around with radical leftist policies and legislation and then backed away from other leftists issues.
Do You Think President Obama Will Win the 2012 Election?
SodaHead Politics
2012/02/22 00:46:28
|
|
|||||
|
477 votes
|
|
50% | |||
|
483 votes
|
|
50% | |||
We know you want to make your opinion count -- especially during the time of a serious election. So, every week, SodaHead will host a handful of up-to-date polls having to do with the upcoming 2012 election.
Vote on this week's election questions below and make sure to come back every Tuesday to see how everyone voted -- and to receive a new batch of questions worth pondering. It's a great time to have an opinion. So, dive right in to our 2012 Election poll.
Vote on this week's election questions below and make sure to come back every Tuesday to see how everyone voted -- and to receive a new batch of questions worth pondering. It's a great time to have an opinion. So, dive right in to our 2012 Election poll.
Read More: http://www.sodahead.com/survey/featured/2012-elect...
Top Opinion
-
Fef 2012/02/22 00:50:00






















our public education system. And they want to put billions more
dollars in that anti-God system; why? to put in moire infidel teachers
and professors?
And if he had "soirees" so against the 1%, why would they fall for it? Are you telling us the most successful people in the country are that easily fooled?
Could you go back to your handlers and tell them your tired old memes aren't working? Maybe they'll think up some fresh ones for you, and at least you won't be a tired old bore on top of being unfactual.
You are missing the point on the 1%. Obama is the 1%. He is Wall St. And, yes, the most successful people in the country are easily fooled just ask any rich Democrat.
Tired old memes, talk about tired. You left out crony and limbic brained.
will "win" it. Stealing it isn't winning it. Fraud isn't winning.
>Actually, the agenda was set years ago by George Soros
The eating healthy agenda was set by Sorors? That's pure tin foil. Thanks for helping the cause!
He has crippled this country and his empty cliches have done nothing to improve the situation.
He has proven that he is a partisan hack incapable of leadership.
Anybody in the Republican field would do a better job than Empty Suit. I would vote the local guy working the fryer at McDonalds before I would vote for BO.
He's just killing us and you are a sychophant to think otherwise.
Our federal government has far exceeded its constitutional powers, and it is time to reign them in, if it is not already too late.
Our Constitution created a very limited federal government with most of the governing power left in the hands of the states.
James Madison, considered the Father of the Constitution, stated the following::
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce."
Although our constitution only granted the federal government limited powers, they seem to believe they can do anything they wish, which is not true.
Madison also had this to say about welfare: “With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”
Maybe the reason the Republicia...
Our federal government has far exceeded its constitutional powers, and it is time to reign them in, if it is not already too late.
Our Constitution created a very limited federal government with most of the governing power left in the hands of the states.
James Madison, considered the Father of the Constitution, stated the following::
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce."
Although our constitution only granted the federal government limited powers, they seem to believe they can do anything they wish, which is not true.
Madison also had this to say about welfare: “With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”
Maybe the reason the Republicians are saying NO, is because even though they are also guilty of promoting big government, they have had enough of the fedral government exceeding its constitutional power.
"Obama’s Legislative Record"
Q: How many times did Obama vote 'present' as a state senator?
A: He did so 129 times, which represents a little more than 3 percent of his total votes.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008...
Wallstreet problem July 2008, Iraq war, Current Debt ect.
The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop...&
&&
&
The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie -starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barneyblocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!)
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!! So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch.
Budgets do not come from the White House.. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party. Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a deficit that I voted for, and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."
Get over it.
You said it Great.