Do you think President Clinton’s speech last night was a success?

by Fox Report with Shepard Smith Posted 2012/09/06 14:00:00

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Bill Clinton, President Clinton, DNC, Barack Obama

Read More

1,227 votes
Read all 1,389 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	719 votes	59%
	No	508 votes	41%

+31

Add a comment above

kudabux 2012/09/06 15:14:16

Yes

+36
If you have to ask that question, you didn't watch it. He was phenomenal: he put it out there in plain English just exactly what the Republican plan was, and explaining that no president could fix in four years what put us in the position.
>> See Replies

More polls by Fox Report with Shepard Smith

strawberry to Mattynr 2012/09/09 01:53:03

Republican administrations waste billions on wars. Just look at what Bush caused.? Pentagon cannot account for all money Bush wasted in Pakistan, Iraq, and Afghanistan. How can you vote for Mitt Romney who said it was not worth catching bin Laden.? Bill Clinton was right about what Obama inherited, and it does take more then four years to clean up the mess. What has Mitt Romney really told Americans.? Nothing of any substance but to attack President Obama.

reply
Mattynr to strawberry 2012/09/09 06:54:32

We simply have to get away from comparing to Bush.... we simply cannot allow Bush to be the standard of what is acceptable and what is not. Romney is not Bush just as much as Obama is not Clinton. Read my thoughts above.

reply
joseph ... to Mattynr 2012/09/09 01:58:08

And we are ashamed of you so please don't come back.

reply
Mattynr to joseph ... 2012/09/09 06:56:07

I have only returned...... been gone a long time.......... I may leave again if intelligent life does not live here.

reply
joseph ... to Mattynr 2012/09/09 08:05:36

If your looking for intelligent life, you certainly won't find it in the Rethuglican party, But you will find bigots ,homophobes, business cheats , liars, climate change deniers, misogynists, bithers , racists , mentally challenged, low information voters and unpatriotic sleaze bags who cheat the American people out of billions of tax revenues while hiding their funds in the Caymans. God luck with the party of corruption and amorality. You should feel quite at home.

reply
Mattynr to joseph ... 2012/09/10 00:08:08

I am not a Republican...... Democrat remember....... now Independent which is not a Party but a choice........ I choose not to vote for Obama.......

reply
joseph ... to Mattynr 2012/09/10 07:09:48

No, I don't remember, because I think you're a liar. Doesn't matter anyway, all the Republican professors at my former university are voting for Obama and cancelling you out, so it's irrelevant to me.

reply
Mattynr to joseph ... 2012/09/21 05:28:13

CA it will not matter.... Obama will win...... he has the Latino vote locked in which is kind of strange...... since many are Conservative.

reply
joseph ... to Mattynr 2012/09/21 06:17:11

Might have something to do with being treated like criminals by people like Mitt Romney just because their skin is brown, don't you think?

reply
Mattynr to joseph ... 2012/09/21 05:26:24

Pay attention...... I am not a Republican..... and no longer a Democrat..... I am an Independent which is not a Party but a choice. I will choose to NOT vote for Obama and I will vote for Romney but I will also vote for Diane Feinstein (D) Senator CA........ see how nice this Freedom is? Independent is wonderful.

reply
joseph ... to Mattynr 2012/09/21 06:15:28 (edited)
strawberry to T J 2012/09/09 01:45:20

+1
You are so very right.! Bill Clinton really socked it to those Mitt Romney followers. That Republican Convention was all attack, nothing of quality or realistic future plans.

reply
luvguins 2012/09/08 04:54:17

Yes

+3
He will be a great asset to the president's campaign. Great speech simplifying the issues for voters.

reply
DavidK 2012/09/08 04:41:40

No

+2
To those already voting for him maybe. Anyone else . no.

reply
T J to DavidK 2012/09/08 05:01:21

+4
That's because you can't be objective.

reply
DavidK to T J 2012/09/08 12:07:40
T J to DavidK 2012/09/08 17:28:42
strawberry to T J 2012/09/09 02:57:57

+1
That is what they do, too much talk, no factual information. In the past I have voted Conservative, Democrat and Independent. I now see Conservatives at their worst. Where were these Americans when Bush was sending billions to Pakistan, actually trying to build up Pakistan's Military to help U.S. fight Taliban.? Pakistan was never or will ever be a U.S. ally. All that money was helping Taliban. Bush had Americans so sidetracked with war in Iraq, they did not see what was happening on the home front.

reply
Mattynr to strawberry 2012/09/09 07:02:56

You have to get over Bush and evaluate using a better standard. I have to tell you that it is hard when you are on the young side and have only experienced one or two Presidents. Any President would look good compared to Bush, does this make Obama look good? Is this what it takes to make him look good? You do know Obama will take the place of comparison soon enough and is even worse than Carter and Nixon.

reply
DavidK to T J 2012/09/09 05:06:58 (edited)

not now that Obama has added 6 trillion more.

reply
T J to DavidK 2012/09/09 05:42:02

And you are still trying to put this recession on Obama. I just love how you make it look like the crash that began in 2007 is somehow Obama's fault. You people hate it when we blame Bush for this, but you're more than willing to blame Obama for stuff that began before he was even elected. It's not working. But since you like charts, I have one too:

reply
DavidK to T J 2012/09/09 06:25:59

then why is it at 8.1% Einstein?

reply
Mattynr to T J 2012/09/09 07:17:47

FACT....... there are 500,000 fewer jobs from Bush leaving office until today. I think you can get better figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The point is Obama ran for office, he ran to correct the wrongs and take care of what needed to be taken care of...... Fault is not the issue.... it is what it is and he came to it all willing to take over and do the job needed. He now says he needs more time to fix it. So, we have to decide whether we should give him more time. See how simple this all is? This has nothing to do with Republican or Democrat... this has to do with Leadership. We have to decide if we approve of Obama's leadership and take a chance on his ability to really do what is needed to SAVE US...... WE ARE IN SERIOUS TROUBLE.

reply
Mattynr to DavidK 2012/09/09 07:07:28

30% of all single Moms are in poverty ....... 1-6 Americans are in poverty and 23-25 Million Americans not working. In June there were 80,000 new jobs but in the same month.....80,000 added to Disability. In Aug. (now) there are an additional 360,000 Americans that have stopped looking for jobs.

reply
DavidK to Mattynr 2012/09/09 14:26:54

+1
Well Obama took America in the wrong direction. He even went over the heads of his own people with his executive order power. He WILL be gone in November! MARK MY WORDS!

reply
bob h. to DavidK 2012/09/09 01:32:48

+2

reply
DavidK to bob h. 2012/09/09 05:04:05

yea, almost as slow as Clintons! Thats why Obama needs to go!

reply
T J to DavidK 2012/09/09 05:42:57

This is government spending genius.

reply
DavidK to T J 2012/09/09 06:45:18

Obama has outspent every US President COMBINED!!!!!!!! If you look at the date dumbass, it is as of Jan. 2009! Wanna see an updated chart?

reply
Mattynr to DavidK 2012/09/09 07:32:28

16 Trillion now......... clicked to 16 Trillion on the first day of the Democrat Convention....... now that was in your face.

reply
DavidK to Mattynr 2012/09/09 14:28:48

wonder why the dems didn't show that! Obama single-handedly added over 5 trillion to that number with nothing to show!

reply
DavidK to bob h. 2012/09/09 06:42:42 (edited)

+1
lets update fool!

The national debt has crossed the $16 trillion threshold, and that it has increased by $5 trillion since Obama took office. You fools want to give him another 5 years?!?!?!?!?!?!? WON'T HAPPEN! MARK MY WORDS!!!!!

reply
Mattynr to bob h. 2012/09/09 07:24:29

+1
OMG....... this is the most distorted graft of them all...... Obama took office in 2008 and he was not charged with any of the spending until 2010 due to budgets created and submitted for the year to follow. All the spending in 2009 was credited to Bush. It is complicated and a truer picture is out there if you really want data that reflects spending. And by the way........ no Budget from Obama in 3 years. If we had one, it would give us an idea of what he has in mind for our Tax dollars.

reply
strawberry to DavidK 2012/09/09 02:51:06

You just don't get the message. This does not happen to U.S. economy in only a few years. This decline takes generations of bad Presidential administrations. Republican administrations waste over billions on wars. What was Bush doing trying to build up Iraq's infrastructure with American money.? U.S. Govt. has no business with such Mideast Nations or trying to change their culture. My son has been to Iraq three times, also on Pentagon business. Iraq has no direction at all now.

reply
DavidK to strawberry 2012/09/09 05:05:38

+1
Obama added 6 trillion and we got what to show?

reply
Mattynr to strawberry 2012/09/09 07:27:08

+1
Reagan inherited an recession, high unemployment, and inflation of 11 %...... took him 4 years but he solved the problems.

reply
Todd The Libertarian 2012/09/08 03:45:08

No

He has made a living kicking socialist Republicans ass.The Republican voters have served up two socialst dumb asses.Easy Job.Lie after lie..Gary Johnson is not such a easy target.

reply
messenger to Todd Th... 2012/09/08 17:53:15

+2
Sorry, who is Gary Johnson?

reply
Todd Th... to messenger 2012/09/09 14:08:05

Liberatarian canidate for President.Check out his story and his record.Campare it to the two Rombamas.

reply
DavidK to messenger 2012/09/09 14:30:45

some buddy of Ron Pauls. They will be extinct like Obama in November!

reply