
Do you think our next 4 years with Romney will be better than the last 4 with Obama?
tncdel
2012/07/04 23:28:58
|
|
|||||
|
28 votes
|
|
78% | |||
|
8 votes
|
|
22% | |||
You know how "well" Obama did his 4 years in office. Here's Romney's track record as an executive:
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/mitt-romney-as-governor...
Top Opinion
-
Wolfman 2012/07/04 23:51:34YES [explain why you think so].






















to make it succeed, just like he took the bankrupt Utah Olympics and provided
a safe and prosperous Olympics that Made Utah and America proud.
Sorry but this latest fiasco pretty much Iced the cake for me!
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/...
Are you sincerely trying to find out the truth, or simply trying to utilize lies for the purpose of bestowing a 2nd term on a liar?
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
The point to my post is that "trickle down economics" was proven to be a failure that does not lead to jobs, but does lead to exploding deficits. Even Reagan's budget director has admitted that is true.
http://billmoyers.com/content...
Paul is a lot closer to Obama when it comes to disregarding the Constitution's core tenet of DOMESTIC national defense. NumbersUSA rates Obama an F minus on illegal immigration, Ron Paul not much better at a D minus. Romney gets a B minus.
Plus Ron Paul even supported the Ground Zero "Victory Over America" mosque!
Get back to me when Ron Paul stops being "pick 'n choose" about what he upholds about our Constitution. That he would have the audacity to claim himself as a "strict constitutionalist" when he is so remiss on upholding the Constitution's basic mandate of domestic national defense is ludicrous. And any Paul-bot parroting that false claim about RP is just a soused on RP kool-aid as are Obama-bots.
RP's son Rand is closer to being a "strict constitutionalist" than is his dad because Rand abides more strongly by the Constitution on domestic national defense.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
Here's another reason:
https://www.numbersusa.com/co...
ALLOWING Americans to use AMERICA'S oil reserves, reigning in the anti-capitalist lunatics in the EPA, these will ALL fix our economic malaise.
I think he will be far worse than Obama who at least has balls. Economists say that the next 5 years will be beset with low employment, and I don't think Romney can change that.
Further, the difference between Romneycare and Obamacare is that Romney's plan was based on capitalism and individual right to choose, Obama's is based on socialism and compelled participation with fines and imprisonment if you don't. This excerpt from Ann Coulter sums it up:
"To act as if Obamacare is the same thing as "Romneycare" is just a word game, on the order of acting like a "gun" has the same properties as a "gunny sack," or "fire" is the same thing as a "firefly."
Romney supported the idea of other states doing something along the lines of his health care bill, but always opposed insurance mandates from the federal government (just as I oppose the federal government issuing general laws about rape, but support state laws against rape.)"
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...