Quantcast

Do you think Obama will allow our military to fight back when N. Korea attacks ours or an Allies ships?

EagleEye 2009/05/27 22:05:11
He will make us turn and run...I believe he is a coward!
He will allow our ships a limited response!
He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
He will destroy those attackers and then attack N.Korea!
He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
You!
Add Photos & Videos
After all he didn't fire back at the PIRATES....and these boys have bigger guns! Will he back down again....Is he a COWARD....or will he allwo our military to destroy the attackers...and then what do you think is next?

Please add your thoughts to your comments!

SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea threatened military action Wednesday against U.S. and South Korean warships plying the waters near the Koreas' disputed maritime border, raising the specter of a naval clash just days after the regime's underground nuclear test.

In Washington, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned that Pyongyang faced unspecified consequences because of its "provocative and belligerent" acts.

Pyongyang, reacting angrily to Seoul's decision to join an international program to intercept ships suspected of aiding nuclear proliferation, called South Korea's decision tantamount to a declaration of war.

"Now that the South Korean puppets were so ridiculous as to join in the said racket and dare declare a war against compatriots," North Korea is "compelled to take a decisive measure," the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea said in a statement carried by state media.

The North Korean army called it a violation of the armistice the two Koreas signed in 1953 to end their three-year war, and said it would no longer honor the treaty.

South Korea's military said Wednesday it was prepared to "respond sternly" to any North Korean provocation.

Clinton said "there are consequences to such actions," referring to discussions in the United Nations meant to punish North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests.

She also underscored the firmness of the U.S. treaty commitment to defend South Korea and Japan, U.S. allies in easy reach of North Korean missiles.

North Korea's latest belligerence comes as the U.N. Security Council debates how to punish the regime for testing a nuclear bomb Monday in what President Barack Obama called a "blatant violation" of international law.

Ambassadors from the five permanent veto-wielding council members — the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — as well as Japan and South Korea were working out the details of a new resolution.

The success of any new sanctions would depend on how aggressively China, one of North Korea's only allies, implements them.

"It's not going too far to say that China holds the keys on sanctions," said Kim Sung-han, an international relations professor at Seoul's Korea University.

South Korea, divided from the North by a heavily fortified border, had responded to the nuclear test by joining the Proliferation Security Initiative, a U.S.-led network of nations seeking to stop ships from transporting the materials used in nuclear bombs.

Seoul previously resisted joining the PSI in favor of seeking reconciliation with Pyongyang, but pushed those efforts aside Monday after the nuclear test in the northeast.

North Korea warned Wednesday that any attempt to stop, board or inspect its ships would constitute a "grave violation."

The regime also said it could no longer promise the safety of U.S. and South Korean warships and civilian vessels in the waters near the Korea's western maritime border.

"They should bear in mind that the (North) has tremendous military muscle and its own method of strike able to conquer any targets in its vicinity at one stroke or hit the U.S. on the raw, if necessary," the army said in a statement carried by state media.

The maritime border has long been a flashpoint between the two Koreas. North Korea disputes the line unilaterally drawn by the United Nations at the end of the Koreas' three-year war in 1953, and has demanded it be redrawn further south.

The truce signed in 1953 and subsequent military agreements call for both sides to refrain from warfare, but doesn't cover the waters off the west coast.

North Korea has used the maritime border dispute to provoke two deadly naval skirmishes — in 1999 and 2002.

On Wednesday, the regime promised "unimaginable and merciless punishment" for anyone daring to challenge its ships.

Pyongyang also reportedly restarted its weapons-grade nuclear plant, South Korean media said.

The Chosun Ilbo newspaper said U.S. spy satellites detected signs of steam at the North's Yongbyon nuclear complex, an indication it may have started reprocessing nuclear fuel. The report, which could not be confirmed, quoted an unidentified government official. South Korea's Yonhap news agency also carried a similar report.

The move would be a major setback for efforts aimed at getting North Korea to disarm.

North Korea had stopped reprocessing fuel rods as part of an international deal. In 2007, it agreed to disable the Yongbyon reactor in exchange for aid and demolished a cooling tower at the complex.

The North has about 8,000 spent fuel rods which, if reprocessed, could allow it to harvest 13 to 18 pounds (six to eight kilograms) of plutonium — enough to make at least one nuclear bomb, experts said. North Korea is believed to have enough plutonium for at least a half dozen atomic bombs.

Further ratcheting up tensions, North Korea test-fired five short-range missiles over the past two days, South Korean officials confirmed.

Russia's foreign minister said world powers must be firm with North Korea but take care to avoid inflaming tensions further.

The world "must not rush to punish North Korea just for punishment's sake," Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, adding that Russia wants a Security Council resolution that will help restart stalled six-nation talks over North Korea's nuclear programs and will not provoke Pyongyang into even more aggressive activity.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak urged officials to "remain calm" in the face of North Korean threats, said Lee Dong-kwan, his spokesman.

Pyongyang isn't afraid of any repercussions for its actions, a North Korean newspaper, the Minju Joson, said Wednesday.

"It is a laughable delusion for the United States to think that it can get us to kneel with sanctions," it said in an editorial. "We've been living under U.S. sanctions for decades, but have firmly safeguarded our ideology and system while moving our achievements forward. The U.S. sanctions policy toward North Korea is like striking a rock with a rotten egg."

___

Associated Press writer Steve Gutterman in Moscow and Edith M. Lederer at the United
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Quanchi 2009/05/28 14:17:17
    He will make us turn and run...I believe he is a coward!
    Quanchi
    +6
    That coward isn't on our side!

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Tee 2009/05/28 09:21:31
    He will destroy those attackers and then attack N.Korea!
    Tee
    +1
    We just got out of one war and now do another yes we must act when acted upon. Let us not forget if go to war they will do something in America look at the twin towers.
  • ana 2009/05/28 07:51:51
    He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
    ana
    +1
    He is a chicken
  • Tee ana 2009/05/28 09:25:22
    Tee
    Why is everyone crying for the lives lost in Iraq would you like for him to do like Bush and go to war and kill more of our youth and for what.
  • WR Tee 2009/05/28 10:51:12
    WR
    +1
    you are a nut we want starter this war
  • Andrea 2009/05/28 07:30:01
    He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
    Andrea
    +1
    Either he will give the order or we will attack without his approval. We will defend our home regardless of what BHO.
  • EagleEye Andrea 2009/05/28 15:26:38 (edited)
    EagleEye
    Andrea...we are still a nation of laws and our military will do whatever our Commander in Chief orders ,,,,its called ROE andrea nation laws military commander cheif orders roe
    loved that pic...don't know what it has to do with anything!
  • Andrea EagleEye 2009/05/28 16:15:06
    Andrea
    I understand that we are a nation of laws. I just don't see us sitting our hands if we are attacked and told to stand down.
  • bmx2884 2009/05/28 05:19:10
    He will make us turn and run...I believe he is a coward!
    bmx2884
  • BPF53 2009/05/28 04:20:20
    He will allow our ships a limited response!
    BPF53
    +1
    It's a "Dammed if you do & Dammed if you don't", either way the dead will be piling up. NK is looking for a fight their people are starving and they need someone to blame. The UN is a joke no backbone, China is pushing the NK to see what the US will do. The Russians & Europe also would love to see us fall flat on our butt and come crawling to them to intercede. Either way the US is in a real Cluster-Screw-up, with 2 other wars and Obama not taking a quick strong stand the NK's will push hard to see if we cave in. If that happens SK's will be on the receiving end with our 30,000 station troops.
  • Angel 2009/05/28 04:15:39
    He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
    Angel
    +5
    someone else will have to actually take the action , remember the pirates, then obama will step up to claim the victory ...
  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2009/05/28 04:08:43
    He will allow our ships a limited response!
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    We don't need in any more war's.
  • Tee Phyl *I... 2009/05/28 09:25:59
    Tee
    Thank You
  • Chris Phyl *I... 2009/05/28 13:37:42
    Chris
    +1
    Right, we don't need anymore wars, but tell me, what would you suggest we do if we are attacked? Shall we sit back and let someone continue to attack us and do nothing cuz you don't want another war? Shall we fight back? If someone broke into your home would you fight back or let them assault you? Personally, I fight back! It appears we may not have much of a choice......but we will see how this plays out. I'm betting Obama will run and hide much like Clinton did while we are attacked over and over again.
  • EagleEye Phyl *I... 2009/05/28 15:31:56 (edited)
    EagleEye
    +1
    No one wants war!.........But sometimes you must fight a small war to aviod a larger one...on our homeland!
    The reality is that over the last 60 years ther us an average of 63 wars going on at any one time! It's just the nature of the humanity! homeland reality 60 years ther average 63 wars nature humanity
  • Madelisa 2009/05/28 03:38:57
    He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
    Madelisa
    +1
    Oh jeez...The rest of these answers are really silly.
  • Ssgtwaldo 2009/05/28 03:18:30
    He will allow our ships a limited response!
    Ssgtwaldo
    +4
    He must respond, however, bombing an aspirin or baby food factory is considered a response by some...
    If he did desert our troops and allies he should be impeached and then hung.....IMO
  • David Maverick, The Godless... 2009/05/28 03:14:40 (edited)
    He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
    David Maverick, The Godless Liberal
    +2
    It would be nice to have a military that's not preoccupied with occupying two middle-eastern nations right now. It would be nice to know that if we ever had to go to war with North Korea, that our soldiers wouldn't be entering their 5th, 6th, 7th, or 8th consecutive tours of duty. It would be nice to not have the diminished national moral high-ground that we used to enjoy. It would be nice if we still had the staunch allies we had 10 years ago. It would be nice if we still had some bargaining power against china.
  • Tee David M... 2009/05/28 09:28:11
    Tee
    Well said.
  • Dan Right 2009/05/28 02:23:18 (edited)
    He will allow our ships a limited response!
    Dan Right
    +3
    limited response and go to the UN for somemore useless non-action crap. His half measures will be wrong play.

    I believe the right play would be destroy the ships that attacked and the base they came from. That would be what I would order the Navy to do.

    and if N.Korea still threatens the south or our own navy we go after the missle launch pads.
  • Chris Dan Right 2009/05/28 13:41:39
    Chris
    +2
    It may be wise to go after their missle launch pads, taking out their ability to launch anything. Problem solved.
  • Steve☮END THE FED☮ 2009/05/28 02:21:27
    He will make us turn and run...I believe he is a coward!
    Steve☮END THE FED☮
  • Selfish 2009/05/28 02:08:41
    He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
    Selfish
    +3
    He might as well go crawl in a hole and beg for mercy
  • DrTim 2009/05/28 02:02:08
    He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
    DrTim
    Not really worthy of a response.
  • Dan Right DrTim 2009/05/28 02:28:53
    Dan Right
    +3
    another nation attack our navy and its not worthy of a response? Just like the USSCOLE Clinton didnt respond to that and we got hit harder.
  • DrTim Dan Right 2009/05/28 02:31:14
    DrTim
    Right is right.............Right???
  • Angel Dan Right 2009/05/28 04:16:36
    Angel
    yet he stops in to make one.......geesh....
  • EagleEye DrTim 2009/05/28 15:43:17 (edited)
    EagleEye
    Dr Tim...as usual I admire your "Idealism"...however we must live in "Realism"....If someone pushes you and you don't push back, you will get pushed again or become a tool of that person. Unfortunetly there is a time in which you must fight or simply die! Like it or not.....That's life!
  • DrTim EagleEye 2009/05/28 18:07:08
    DrTim
    Who's the "Snotty little girl"??
  • NatAlex23 2009/05/28 01:58:07
    He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
    NatAlex23
    He will be under too much political pressure NOT to.
  • Kay 2009/05/28 01:41:32
    He will make us turn and run...I believe he is a coward!
    Kay
    +5
    I believe that Obama will get us all killed. The idiot still thinks that hugs will solve all the problems..
  • David M... Kay 2009/05/28 03:28:59
    David Maverick, The Godless Liberal
    he wouldn't be the first.

    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/...
  • Kay David M... 2009/05/28 11:57:13
    Kay
    +4
    Bush isn't in office, Obama is and he is one frightening idiot..
  • David M... Kay 2009/05/28 12:04:12 (edited)
    David Maverick, The Godless Liberal
    reading comprehension problems?

    reading comprehension problems
  • chaoskitty123 2009/05/28 00:26:24
    He will allow our ships a limited response!
    chaoskitty123
    +3
    Well after holding out his hand to iran the first month he was in office, having them spit in his face and fire a missile up his ass...kinda would think the leaders in North Korea saw that and realized the US had a child for a President who needs to learn what a President is before he might be taken seriously...I kinda think Obama himself caused that nuclear test that's got the Japanese so afraid.

    A seasoned President would go to China and tell them if they don't support action against North Korea then were are moving nuclear missiles to Japan to protect it against a North Korea attack.

    I still say it's time we had a leader begin talking about merging the two Koreas back into one nation or just let the Chinese have North Korea to shut that little turd up who runs the country.

    But I do believe if they fire on us that Obama would give our troops the right to a limited response...even if that's to tuck tail and run lol.
  • Dan Right chaoski... 2009/05/28 02:31:45
    Dan Right
    +1
    I think you mean wounded child for a President.
  • Jukebox chaoski... 2009/05/28 13:08:08
    Jukebox
    Except that Japan would never allow nuclear weapons on their soil.
  • EagleEye Jukebox 2009/05/28 15:46:44
    EagleEye
    that may change....but will China allow us to place them in Japan?
  • Jukebox EagleEye 2009/05/29 00:35:07
    Jukebox
    It's a negotiating point and one that we could easily do without. We can obliterate China by submarine, bombers and intercontinental, US-based missiles. Should it prove prudent to put missiles in Japan, there wouldn't be a thing China could do about it. They would bluster. They would threaten to threaten Taiwan. They might even threaten to dump US Treasury securities, but in the end they know there's nothing they can do because they can't risk any kind of direct military (or economic) confrontation with the US. China is a dangerous country, but they're not foolish. I can't see them risking all they've gained over the past 20+ years on non-issues like North Korea.
  • Zuggi 2009/05/28 00:08:40
    He will allow the full force of our military of the attacking ships!
    Zuggi
    duh
  • Linnaeus 2009/05/27 23:51:16
    He will go to the UN and ask for more Trade Embargo's
    Linnaeus
    He'll just let them take over the country, like he did with those pirates.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 02:55:01

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals