what i don't understand what about you christian right, you know the ones who are against abortion and gay sex cause the bible says its a sin???? well what about voting for a man who believes god lives on a planet in out space and that satan and jesus were brothers? what about a man who belongs to a church that wrote their own bible? and what about a m an who belongs to a church that teaches you can too become a god by following moron laws and one day have your own planet to rule just like God? it seems you all have chosen to look the other way on all of this this makes me think i was right you don't care about god or the bible just and excuse you have been using because how anyone can vote that a man involved in a cult against what jesus and the bible says is shocking , buthey at least hes the right color??? yeah i k now has nothing to do with race right
I don't vote for politicians because they claim to be Christians. Even Bush and Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore who claimed to be Christians, are really not, in my humble opinion, and as far as I know, there has not been one truly sanctified Christian who has been loyal to Biblical truth who has ever been a resident of the White House. The American voters are not electing Christians, they are voting for the men who they believe will promote and defend the Constitution. Obama is half Muslim and half black liberation theology phony Christian who was a member of a church whose pastor hated white people and hated America. Is that better than a Mormon? Really? Right now, you have two real choices - Obama or Romney - make your choice. Voting for Romney for President is not an endorsement of Mormonism. The racial comments are ludicrous.
You don't like to research your comments much, do you? If you took the trouble to look at my profile, you would find that, while I admire many of the SHs who are devoutly Christian, I am not now nor ever have I been a Christian. In fact, on more days than not, I'm an atheist.
As for abortion, I don't express any opinion on it in my profile, but in most of the postings I've put up on SH relating to abortion, I note that I have supported abortion as social policy since 1969 and worked for the then Republican controlled NYS Legislature which passed a statute legalizing abortion based solely on an attending physician's determination of medical need, becoming the first American jurisdiction to do so. Notwithstanding my view of abortion as social policy, however, I think the idea of a Constitutional right to an abortion is laughable, even if it has been judicially ratified on repeated occasions by theUSSC. Moreover, given the USSC finding that a woman has a Constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, I think the continuing inability of all biological fathers to terminate their liability for support of a child they did not intend to father is a denial of equal protection; not that I think that the father should have an absolute right to refuse paternity - though there's nothing ...
You don't like to research your comments much, do you? If you took the trouble to look at my profile, you would find that, while I admire many of the SHs who are devoutly Christian, I am not now nor ever have I been a Christian. In fact, on more days than not, I'm an atheist.
As for abortion, I don't express any opinion on it in my profile, but in most of the postings I've put up on SH relating to abortion, I note that I have supported abortion as social policy since 1969 and worked for the then Republican controlled NYS Legislature which passed a statute legalizing abortion based solely on an attending physician's determination of medical need, becoming the first American jurisdiction to do so. Notwithstanding my view of abortion as social policy, however, I think the idea of a Constitutional right to an abortion is laughable, even if it has been judicially ratified on repeated occasions by theUSSC. Moreover, given the USSC finding that a woman has a Constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, I think the continuing inability of all biological fathers to terminate their liability for support of a child they did not intend to father is a denial of equal protection; not that I think that the father should have an absolute right to refuse paternity - though there's nothing inherently illogical about that - but there are many conditions that could be established relating to paternal financial responsibility that States have refused to examine, w/ the tacit approval of the USSC.
This is my favorite sentence from the speech and I think it says it all!
"You know there is something wrong with the kind of job he's done as president when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him." ---- Mitt Romney
I think he did great. I am having trouble understanding all these people saying that he supposedly is this mediocre speaker. I thought his speech was very moving and just terrific actually. I also don't think he jumbles up his words as much as some people are saying. I have heard the democracts taking him out of context a few times and twisting his words. I have not heard him gaffing as people are saying. His speech was perfect.
His speach was about as perfect as rash on my ass in the summer.talk is cheap where the policy and detailed plan to improve america ????anybody where u at
"And unlike the President, I have a plan to create 12 million new jobs. It has 5 steps.
First, by 2020, North America will be energy independent by taking full advantage of our oil and coal and gas and nuclear and renewables.
Second, we will give our fellow citizens the skills they need for the jobs of today and the careers of tomorrow. When it comes to the school your child will attend, every parent should have a choice, and every child should have a chance.
Third, we will make trade work for America by forging new trade agreements. And when nations cheat in trade, there will be unmistakable consequences.
Fourth, to assure every entrepreneur and every job creator that their investments in America will not vanish as have those in Greece, we will cut the deficit and put America on track to a balanced budget.
And fifth, we will champion SMALL businesses, America's engine of job growth. That means reducing taxes on business, not raising them. It means simplifying and modernizing the regulations that hurt small business the most. And it means that we must rein in the skyrocketing cost of healthcare by repealing and replacing Obamacare."
I notice that he doesn't actually say those 12 million new jobs will be in America. Given Romney's track record, it's more likely that he'd create 12 million new jobs in China.
Yeah - right. Are you kidding me? Come on, man! I'm sure he meant that he planned to create 12 million jobs in China. You, moron! Get out of your mother's basement and come up into the light, breath some fresh air, and take a bath. You'll feel better about yourself and you will think more clearly.
Given Romney's absolutely dismal record at job creation as governor of Massachusetts, I see no reason to believe he'd be able to create 12 million jobs in America.
I think he had a fairly good record as a governor: at least he has a record. Obama came to the presidency with virtually no record and his record as president has been abysmal.
Obama's record as president has been 3 years of nonstop job creation. Romney's record as governor was 47th in the nation in job creation. One of the few states below Massachusetts when Romney was governor? Post-Katrina Louisiana. And remember, prior to Romney's failed stint in the governor's mansion, the Massachusetts economy was known as the "Massachusetts Miracle". It took incredible incompetence for Romney to screw that up.
Three years of non-stop job creation? If that were true the unemployment rate would be coming down. Sadly, it isn't.
The Massachusetts Miracle took place in the 1980,s. There was a terrific and devastating downturn in the economy there prior to Romney's term in office which began in 2003. They were losing jobs at a record pace:
“Massachusetts is number one in the nation in job losses, shedding 4.7 percent of all jobs over the last two years. The state has lost 71,000 manufacturing jobs, or 17 percent; 69,000, or nearly 14 percent, of all jobs in the professional and business services sector; and nearly 18 percent of all jobs in the information industry.” (Boston Globe April 2003)
While Romney was governor that changed and even though the rate of increase in job creation ranked 47th - that was a great turnaround from the situation that has previously existed. Romney did a great job as governor and you are a liar.
The unemployment rate has come down. It topped 10% at the height of the recession. And it would be around 6% right now if Republicans weren't orchestrating mass layoffs of public workers.
It was over 9% when he took office, and climbed to over 10%. Now it's still over 8%. Sure continue to play the blame game. It won't work come November.
Another Liberal racist hypocrite joins the rest of the idiot leftists on Sodahead. Have fun getting your ass handed to you daily by the Patriotic, American conservatives who own this site.
But, it was Obams's BS that told them that the plant would not close and, once it closed, and Obama was elected, the plant, along with countless others, has not re-opened.
Obama said: 'I believe that if our government is there to support you, this plant will be here for another hundred years.' That's what he said in 2008. It's all about facts!
He made an empty promise; a recurring theme throughout his administration. He was talking out of his ass at the time; and continues to do that same thing today.
As for abortion, I don't express any opinion on it in my profile, but in most of the postings I've put up on SH relating to abortion, I note that I have supported abortion as social policy since 1969 and worked for the then Republican controlled NYS Legislature which passed a statute legalizing abortion based solely on an attending physician's determination of medical need, becoming the first American jurisdiction to do so. Notwithstanding my view of abortion as social policy, however, I think the idea of a Constitutional right to an abortion is laughable, even if it has been judicially ratified on repeated occasions by theUSSC. Moreover, given the USSC finding that a woman has a Constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, I think the continuing inability of all biological fathers to terminate their liability for support of a child they did not intend to father is a denial of equal protection; not that I think that the father should have an absolute right to refuse paternity - though there's nothing ...
As for abortion, I don't express any opinion on it in my profile, but in most of the postings I've put up on SH relating to abortion, I note that I have supported abortion as social policy since 1969 and worked for the then Republican controlled NYS Legislature which passed a statute legalizing abortion based solely on an attending physician's determination of medical need, becoming the first American jurisdiction to do so. Notwithstanding my view of abortion as social policy, however, I think the idea of a Constitutional right to an abortion is laughable, even if it has been judicially ratified on repeated occasions by theUSSC. Moreover, given the USSC finding that a woman has a Constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, I think the continuing inability of all biological fathers to terminate their liability for support of a child they did not intend to father is a denial of equal protection; not that I think that the father should have an absolute right to refuse paternity - though there's nothing inherently illogical about that - but there are many conditions that could be established relating to paternal financial responsibility that States have refused to examine, w/ the tacit approval of the USSC.
B. I don't vote religion at any rate.
"You know there is something wrong with the kind of job he's done as president when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him." ---- Mitt Romney
First, by 2020, North America will be energy independent by taking full advantage of our oil and coal and gas and nuclear and renewables.
Second, we will give our fellow citizens the skills they need for the jobs of today and the careers of tomorrow. When it comes to the school your child will attend, every parent should have a choice, and every child should have a chance.
Third, we will make trade work for America by forging new trade agreements. And when nations cheat in trade, there will be unmistakable consequences.
Fourth, to assure every entrepreneur and every job creator that their investments in America will not vanish as have those in Greece, we will cut the deficit and put America on track to a balanced budget.
And fifth, we will champion SMALL businesses, America's engine of job growth. That means reducing taxes on business, not raising them. It means simplifying and modernizing the regulations that hurt small business the most. And it means that we must rein in the skyrocketing cost of healthcare by repealing and replacing Obamacare."
That seems pretty clear to me.
The Massachusetts Miracle took place in the 1980,s. There was a terrific and devastating downturn in the economy there prior to Romney's term in office which began in 2003. They were losing jobs at a record pace:
“Massachusetts is number one in the nation in job losses, shedding 4.7 percent of all jobs over the last two years. The state has lost 71,000 manufacturing jobs, or 17 percent; 69,000, or nearly 14 percent, of all jobs in the professional and business services sector; and nearly 18 percent of all jobs in the information industry.” (Boston Globe April 2003)
While Romney was governor that changed and even though the rate of increase in job creation ranked 47th - that was a great turnaround from the situation that has previously existed. Romney did a great job as governor and you are a liar.
69% of SH respondents think that it was a success. Back in 2008, 68% of SodaHeads hoped and believed that McCain would be elected. Wrong, as usual.