Do you think criminals should have it easier to prey upon unarmed citizens because of the gun control freaks? rave if you think gun control freaks will endanger more lives, and cause higher crime in general
They ask, "why do you need an AR-15?" and the truth is that a home invasion of 4 or 5 Obama Voters hyped on PCP need 5 or 6 shots each to put them down. You need a 30 round clip to protect your family from that and the likely bands of marauding Obama Voters resulting from the collapse caused by Obama's policies.
Do you think that tax paying, law abiding citizens should have their children massacred at their grammar school because the US has no reasonable gun laws?
Depends on reasonable, ad since we don't use the laws on the books npow , what are new ones going to do, [ nothing as usual ] Better to be armed , then not.
The fact that a mentally ill person can walk into his Mom's house, and then walk out with the weapons that the Newtown killer did is evidence enough that we don't have sensible gun laws.
Thanks for the silly cartoon, otherwise I may have assumed you were serious. The fact that the criminal has such easy access to guns hardly supports your argument. He probably bought them at a gun show.
Arm the blind. Arm the school children. Arm Black people.Arm illegal aliens. Arm the Poor. Arm the Muslims. Make open carry REQUIRED. Then we'll ALL feel safer.
The Panthers were EXERCISING THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS. That makes them LAw-Abiding Citizens for the record. What did they get for that? COINTELPRO, or government sanctioned murder by the police and FBI.
I've been around a very long time. FDR was president when I was born. To this day I never had reason or cause to fire a gun in anger. (I'm a U. S. Navy peace time veteran.) People with guns kill people more than people with fists, knives or baseball bats kill people. Hell, we already have a well armed militia. Unless you are planning on overthrowing the government, why would you need assault weapons?
why? just a few weeks ago a women with two kids had a home invasion and she shot the attacker 5 times, he was able to leave and drive away. What if there had been 2,3 or 4 of them? She'd be dead. In my area in the last six months of last year there were a dozen home invasions within an hours drive of me, and though remote, it could happen. (by the way in several of them the homeowners were killed) And if there are multiple attackers they could require 5 or 6 shots each plus you figure you miss a few, you need a 30 round clip for that.
Also, I don't believe that the people in the government should be allowed better protection than regular people are allowed to have. And I also believe that under Obama's policies of printing money and running up the debt we are likely to have a massive collapse that will make the last one look fun. And given that Obama Voters burned LA some 20 years ago, given any reason they will be out doing it again, and I am ready for any outcome, that is my right to be so prepared.
Moreover, it is no ones business how I choose to be ready to defend my family and property, and I believe anyone who is not prepared as I am is a fool.
I am gad the woman is safe, Andy. But I suspect that had there been 2, 3, or 4 of them and they too were armed, there would have been tragic results.
Our leading government officials - Republican and Democrat are under constant threat in the performance of their duties. Some, but not all, need security.
So you are worried about people from the inter-cities invading your tranquil, drug free, top schools, crime free, White suburbia? And, just in case, you feel the need to own an arsenal to protect yourself and your family?
I hope that your paranoia is just that - paranoia. Gook luck.
I believe it to be simple insight, we have too many who believe "fairness" is taking from others and monetizing the debt will lead to collapse. You go risk your life on the benevolence of the mobs, I won't.
It restricted Black People who were being KILLED BY the Police from owning arms for self-defense. Curious how the Mulford Act was only passed AFTER the Panthers showed up at the State Capitol in Sacramento exercising THEIR 2nd Amendment rights. Where was the NRA THEN? Oh, that's right, on the side of WHITE people and the STATE.
LMAO.... Still clueless..
Also, I don't believe that the people in the government should be allowed better protection than regular people are allowed to have. And I also believe that under Obama's policies of printing money and running up the debt we are likely to have a massive collapse that will make the last one look fun. And given that Obama Voters burned LA some 20 years ago, given any reason they will be out doing it again, and I am ready for any outcome, that is my right to be so prepared.
Moreover, it is no ones business how I choose to be ready to defend my family and property, and I believe anyone who is not prepared as I am is a fool.
Our leading government officials - Republican and Democrat are under constant threat in the performance of their duties. Some, but not all, need security.
So you are worried about people from the inter-cities invading your tranquil, drug free, top schools, crime free, White suburbia? And, just in case, you feel the need to own an arsenal to protect yourself and your family?
I hope that your paranoia is just that - paranoia. Gook luck.