Quantcast

Do you think assault weapons should be banned?

Tudie BN 2012/08/06 19:07:31
Related Topics: Questions, Assault, Aw
Hmm
Aw
Undecided
All of the above
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Please Rave this question .. Thanks

Welcome Friends to Tudies Questions ! Thanks for your reply ! : )
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • America... Ambassa... 2012/08/08 01:14:24
    American Reformed
    Neither has mine. My evaluations were mandatory for all of us.

    Blessings Upon You
  • Ambassa... America... 2012/08/08 01:19:50
    Ambassador II
    Must have been some reason and all this "Sky Man" stuff gives us a clue as to the background. If "us" were Priests or other religious sorts, don't waste more time telling about the "evaluations" as we know the rest of the story.
  • America... Ambassa... 2012/08/08 01:55:51
    American Reformed
    +1
    It's quite simple I was a medic attached to a Marine unit and then served a large metropolitan area responding specifically to trauma calls. I've seen a lot of death, I've seen a lot of dismemberment, I've seen a lot of gun shot wounds (I served a high crime area for a fair amount of time). Evaluations were routine as many who do my job eventually suffer from PTSD or some other type of anxiety disorder. Responding to any call that involved the death of children resulted in evaluations. Responding to calls that involved some type of violent death such as a GSW, or a dismemberment from motor vehicle accidents also often resulted in evaluations. While enlisted we also had routine evaluations. I was fortunate, not all departments have the resources we had. I never minded the evaluations.

    As for your comments concerning the Clergy; I'm not Roman Catholic. So far as I am aware the Orthodox body of which I am a part has never had an accusation of any type of sexual abuse. I also know that in my position our response, should any such accusation be made, is to help the family notify the authorities and then notify the Bishop; in that order.

    Now if you have something to add to the discussion I'd be interested in reading it but if your intention is to continue to question my sanity or to continue to take shots at a Church I don't even belong to I am not really interested in continued discussion with you.

    Blessings Upon You
  • john brenni 2012/08/07 00:12:07
    All of the above
    john brenni
    +2
    the way things are going in the big cities one of which i live in god forbid the annointed one isnt reelected.....the mobs of his base[obama gonna buy me free gas, pay my mortgage] will go nuts and riot especially targeting whites fir [electing that cracker romney] i will be ready for them.
  • Georgia50 2012/08/07 00:07:36
    None of the above
    Georgia50
    +4
    No. A million times no.
  • Squatch 2012/08/06 23:19:06
    Aw
    Squatch
    +3
    would not matter - personally I think a car explosion with it full of gas in the tank and trunk would kill more people - look at the middle east - guns all over the place there - yet IEDs and car bombs kill way more than guns - bottom line is - if crazy people want to kill you they are going to find a way
  • SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY 2012/08/06 23:18:29
    Hmm
    SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY
    +2
    nnnope.
  • Bluishfire 2012/08/06 23:14:55
    None of the above
    Bluishfire
    +1
    I dont think it would make much of a difference to bann it, because if people really want something they will find a way around it anyhow.
  • Tudie BN Bluishfire 2012/08/06 23:16:30
    Tudie BN
    +1
    Thanks Bluishfire !
  • WinterLynn 2012/08/06 23:14:43
    None of the above
    WinterLynn
    +4
    Nope.

    My husband owns 3 Assault Weapons.

    2nd Amendment
  • Wake Th... WinterLynn 2012/08/06 23:22:15
    Wake The Sheeple
    +2
    Please call them tactical weapons. Do not use the gun grabber terminology.
  • Gordon 2012/08/06 23:10:03
    None of the above
    Gordon
    +3
    Animal hunters do not need assault weapons unless they are very poor shots. In that case, they should not be out hunting. Assault weapons are for killing lots of people. American citizens have not needed them until we got stuck with a socialist pig racist for president. We might need them to defend ourselves against Obama's gestapo dogs.
  • Ambassa... Gordon 2012/08/07 01:00:45
    Ambassador II
    +1
    You demonstrate completely why lunatics and mentally unstable sorts should not be allowed to own such weapons. The world is filled with such fools and crazies.
  • Bocephus 2012/08/06 23:09:50 (edited)
    Undecided
    Bocephus
    +5
    Simple No. No one group should have absolute power. It should be spread through out the people. kids shooting guns
  • phil white Bocephus 2012/08/06 23:24:48
    phil white
    +1
    OK Mom, what's this "grounded" kr-p?
  • Ambassa... Bocephus 2012/08/07 01:03:42
    Ambassador II
    +1
    Isn't this a great example of the sickness that surrounds us, the teaching of violence and murder to innocent children. When they are teenagers and face a crisis or failure, they can
    take "Daddy's gun" to school and kill their tormentors, or go to Grandma's house and kill the old lady and steal her car. Sickos, absolute fools without any remorse for their stupidity.
  • historian Ambassa... 2012/08/07 05:01:00
    historian
    +1
    Guns don't create the depraved mind you're describing that would take a weapon and murder people and family. Do you have a gun phobia that triggers these nightmarish visions?
  • Liberty... historian 2012/08/07 05:03:56
    LibertyCaroline
    +1
    He must be part of the psychic police.
  • Bocephus Ambassa... 2012/08/18 19:42:10
    Bocephus
    +1
    What you said isn't as common as you would think. More children die in pools then they do from guns. Get your facts straight.
  • Ambassa... Bocephus 2012/08/18 20:21:39
    Ambassador II
    +1
    And is that some sort of good news you are wanting to share? Each life is precious and not to be dismissed because it is a lesser happening than some other. Good God, where do these sorts of irrational comments come from?
  • Michael S. Bocephus 2012/08/07 20:32:51 (edited)
    Michael S.
    +1
    Okay, I really hope those are unloaded. Kids incapable of responsibly handling a weapon should not be used to make a statement like that...it's sick, and it sends the wrong message, and this is coming from someone who believes the Second Amendment is absolute.
  • "OG" 2012/08/06 23:08:52
    None of the above
    "OG"
    +3
    To much MSM is why people believe they are Assault Weapons. They are Combat or Tactical weapons perfectly legal to sell and purchase in the US. To inform those who don't know Full Auto weapons and suppressors could be owned by anyone up until 1934 when the National Firearms Act was put into place. A full auto weapon and suppressor can be legally owned in this country as long as you purchase the 200 dollar tax stamp for the weapon and the suppressor and pass the proper background checks. Suppressors can now be used for hunting wild game.
  • Lulu's Mom 2012/08/06 23:04:28
    Hmm
    Lulu's Mom
    +2
    I already know who will say yes and who will say no. So I will just say that you can protect yourself with a 22 as easily as you can with an AK-47.
  • Tudie BN Lulu's Mom 2012/08/06 23:04:57
    Tudie BN
    +1
    Thanks Lulu's Mom !
  • Wake Th... Lulu's Mom 2012/08/06 23:24:21
    Wake The Sheeple
    +4
    Care to wager your life on that? I sure as hell don't.
  • phil white 2012/08/06 23:04:05 (edited)
    Aw
    phil white
    +6
    No, an armed citizenry is the last barrier to dictatorship.

    And we need to make if part of the local Sheriffs job to organize the local militia. Every able bodied man 17 to 50 should keep a standard military rifle at home.
    The crew served weapons should be kept at the armory.
  • GoatHorns 2012/08/06 22:46:43 (edited)
  • DFA 2012/08/06 22:41:34
    Hmm
    DFA
    +2
    Yes. They are excessive.
  • handeman 2012/08/06 22:30:07
    Hmm
    handeman
    +3
    No bans at all
  • **StarzAbove** 2012/08/06 22:24:54
    Hmm
    **StarzAbove**
  • Tudie BN **Starz... 2012/08/06 22:29:42
    Tudie BN
    +1
    Thanks StarzAbove !
  • **Starz... Tudie BN 2012/08/06 22:32:28
    **StarzAbove**
    +1
    YW Tudie.
  • zapped 2012/08/06 22:21:45
    None of the above
    zapped
    +3
    define the fact the shooter in the temple used a hand gun ...

    wasnt an assault rifle ..

    the weapon used in colorado was SEMI AUTO " wasnt and better than a weapon used for hunting ...
  • Tudie BN zapped 2012/08/06 22:29:54
    Tudie BN
    Thanks zapped !
  • Wake Th... zapped 2012/08/06 23:19:55 (edited)
    Wake The Sheeple
    +1
    There were 4 shooters according to eye witnesses... Just like the Colorado shooting had more than one according to eye witnesses. Stinks of a "ends justifying the means" scenario.
  • zapped Wake Th... 2012/08/08 02:33:16
    zapped
    +1
    well the senario in colorado stinks of collaboration .. in more ways than one !

    and unless the FBI does there job well never know the truth ,,( then if there involved we'll never know )

    collateral cassualites ... unforunately yes !

    the agenda stands ,,, and more to come !
  • Wake Th... zapped 2012/08/08 04:43:22
    Wake The Sheeple
    Anytime a federal agency "takes over" we know that it isn't what they say it is.
  • zapped Wake Th... 2012/08/08 21:13:35
    zapped
    +1
    especially when a police commander made a statement to the public (NOW RECANTED ) that there was above the experience level of a lone gunman ( the trip wires were well above his tatical experience level ) more of a spec ops trning !

    you tell me ?
  • Wake Th... zapped 2012/08/08 21:48:50
    Wake The Sheeple
    Bingo! They have to sell the UN small arms treaty to the American people somehow.
  • zapped Wake Th... 2012/08/08 23:10:01
    zapped
    +1
    the interesting point here is the UN ammo restrictions BAN hollow point ammo. but the homeland security ordered & recieved 450 MILLION rounds of 40/45 caliber rounds ??

    and they need to sell this agenda to the libs .

    so if they can orchestrate "incidences " w/ collateral cassualties , then glamorize it and have many cassualties . then can restrict the posession / purchase , of these weapons ,,then get the UN treaty into this country !

    but they cant with our constitution in place !

    then this thought ,,,,w/ the bungelled fast & furious there was 300 mexican civillians killed in that affair !.....soooo ?

    that was hushed in the media ....!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 21:41:36

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals