Quantcast

Do you thing limits should be applied to welfare and food stamp receipients?

Robert 2012/04/15 17:14:11
You!
Add Photos & Videos
It's my belief that limits should be set. I think you should only be allowed 2 children. How may times does someone have to get pregnant before she realizes that sex without the use of contraception causes pregnancy. I feel that 2 is more that enough children for this message to be learned. It's just not fair for taxpayers to keep feeding a house full of children that could have been avoided by using some plain and simple common since.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Melicious Kiss of PHAET 2012/04/15 18:34:26 (edited)
    NO
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +16
    This is a slippery slope. First you legislate how many children a person on welfare can have, then it because based on financials, then race, then sexuality. Where does it end? Who decides? What about religious beliefs? Do you think abortion and infantcide will decrease or increase?



    China has laws like these, is that what you want?

    warning slippery slope

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Phillip... Bearish... 2012/04/16 00:48:23
  • Bearish... Phillip... 2012/04/16 01:00:59
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +1
    shes a lib, Nuff said
  • Phillip... Bearish... 2012/04/16 01:27:24
  • Bearish... Phillip... 2012/04/16 10:52:46
    Bearish~PWCM~
    I think it may be an issue of not being able to admit they made a mistake?
  • Phillip... Bearish... 2012/04/16 12:46:11
  • Bearish... Phillip... 2012/04/16 15:50:45
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +1
    Generally I try to keep my mouth shut unless I'm sure about the subject.. But when I'm wrong, I will be the 1st to admit it
  • Phillip... Bearish... 2012/04/17 00:24:17
  • Cat 1017 2012/04/15 20:09:49 (edited)
    YES
    Cat 1017
    +2
    There already IS.....
  • John Galt jr or Ron/jon 2012/04/15 18:59:19 (edited)
    NO
    John Galt jr or Ron/jon
    +7
    no that's what they do in china

    and I might be willing to listen to your opinion if you had a better grasp of the english language
  • Robert John Ga... 2012/04/16 00:47:08
    Robert
    +2
    Double check your replies for errors before commenting on someone elses english. The first word of any sentence should be capitalized sir.
  • Linnster Robert 2012/04/16 03:57:49
    Linnster
    +1
    Well, there should be an apostrophe in "else's," English deserves a capital "E," and I'm pretty sure there should be a comma before "sir." Otherwise, you did well.
  • Robert Linnster 2012/04/16 04:40:09
  • Linnster Robert 2012/04/16 11:30:00
    Linnster
    I'm sorry - I couldn't resist. :))) Have a great day, Robert.
  • John Ga... Robert 2012/04/23 22:49:01
    John Galt jr or Ron/jon
    and if I am disabled and only have one hand to type with?
  • Melicious Kiss of PHAET 2012/04/15 18:34:26 (edited)
    NO
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +16
    This is a slippery slope. First you legislate how many children a person on welfare can have, then it because based on financials, then race, then sexuality. Where does it end? Who decides? What about religious beliefs? Do you think abortion and infantcide will decrease or increase?



    China has laws like these, is that what you want?

    warning slippery slope
  • oldlady Melicio... 2012/04/15 18:44:11
    oldlady
    +4
    Does China still kill girls a birth? Maybe he would be happy if we did the same (((shivers))).
  • Melicio... oldlady 2012/04/15 18:45:58
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +8
    China and India both. :(
  • oldlady Melicio... 2012/04/15 18:57:38
  • Bearish... oldlady 2012/04/15 23:46:30
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +2
    But its OK for you Libs to murder millions of babies, As long as its called abortion Not murder? You guys make China seem humane
  • Melicio... Bearish... 2012/04/16 01:10:02
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +9
    You just showed your ignorance. "You guys make China seem humane." Rrrriiiiighht. Perhaps you should do your home work and you won't look so foolish.

    China has approximately 13 million abortions a year, versus 1.2 million abortions in the United States.

    http://articles.cnn.com/2009-...

    http://www.christianpost.com/...
  • Bearish... Melicio... 2012/04/16 01:18:16
    Bearish~PWCM~
    OH for Gods sake, I was trying to make a point not a calculation.. OK OK so you only killed1.2 million human beings.. I'm sorry you are not as much a murderer as those in China.. You feel better now? Do you think those 1.2 MILLION babies care if your feelings were hurt?
    BTW.. Do the math as far as %s by population?? Those numbers get a lot closer.. You libs crack me up... I'm ignorant because I don't believe in the killing of children.. Thank you God, I'm ignorant
  • Melicio... Bearish... 2012/04/16 01:24:05
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +9
    My feelings weren't hurt at all.

    I was merely pointing out the facts to you. You are the one who seems quite upset. chill pill
  • Feria~T... Melicio... 2012/04/16 02:48:04
    Feria~THEZombieSlayingB!tch of PHAET!~Badass Incarnate~
    +8
    I love you he said it like you personally killed all those fetus'. Watch out Mel, they'll be coming for ya!
  • Melicio... Feria~T... 2012/04/16 02:50:36
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +7
    I know right? Little does he know, eh? Oh and the "do your math" argument doesn't work so well either.

    Let 'em come, I have Feria the BAMF zombie slayer on my side. Together we shall take them down!!!
  • Feria~T... Melicio... 2012/04/16 03:04:56
    Feria~THEZombieSlayingB!tch of PHAET!~Badass Incarnate~
    +7
    LMAO! True that!

    this is my boomstick
    WOOT!
  • Latti I... Bearish... 2012/04/16 04:38:09
    Latti Ice Ganga Gangsta of PHAET
    +6
    The difference is most are forced in China with the one child ruling.
  • Melizmatic Melicio... 2012/04/15 19:52:12
    Melizmatic
    +7
    Agreed.
  • Bearish... Melicio... 2012/04/15 23:45:20
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +2
    Its clear that Robert was saying that only 2 children should be considered when evaluating the amount paid to a welfare recipient.. I don't think he is implying in any way the killing of any children beyond 2 as they do in China..
  • Melicio... Bearish... 2012/04/16 00:32:48
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +6
    No? Isn't that how it starts. "Oh crap! I'm pregnant with child #3, I cannot afford it, and I wont get any more assistance... guess I should get rid of it."

    Like I said. Slippery slope.
  • Bearish... Melicio... 2012/04/16 00:40:43
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +1
    What I'm saying is there are woman (with the mans blessing) who intentionally get pregnant for the additional bennies.. Then they use those very benefits for illegal activities.. It makes me sick.. Maybe if the incentive was gone there would be less
    OH CRAPS out there
    There are plenty of people looking to adopt.. There is no need to "get rid of it" as you say.. That is another issue society has, Everything is disposable, Even a life
  • Melicio... Bearish... 2012/04/16 00:42:37
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +8
    There are plenty of people looking to adopt? Really? If this is true, then why are their so many children lingering and failing in foster care. Why are they not being adopted?
  • Bearish... Melicio... 2012/04/16 01:04:21
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +2
    The government has made it next to imposible to get through the red tape..
    That is the reason people are going out of country..

    So rather than have a kid in foster care we should "Get rid of IT"
  • Melicio... Bearish... 2012/04/16 01:06:18
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +8
    Funny. I know several couples who adopted from the Foster system, far faster than adopting a baby. Red Tape wasn't much of a problem.
  • Ves~Sai... Bearish... 2012/04/16 05:17:30
    Ves~Sailor Soldier of PHAET
    +3
    There are not enough people to accommodate all the children there are in the country/ let alone world, whom have no homes/ in foster care. Yes people who can/want/and will adopt should, but there will never be enough parents vs kids, there are more babies/children out there than any couple could adopt to make up for all those in foster care.
  • Robert Bearish... 2012/04/16 00:51:39
    Robert
    +1
    TY, you are correct. I don't know where someone got the aborting babies idea. In fact I'm pro-life.
  • Melicio... Robert 2012/04/16 01:06:37
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +7
    Who said you weren't pro-life?
  • Bearish... Robert 2012/04/16 01:09:02
    Bearish~PWCM~
    +2
    NP The assumptions they made as to the motive of your question are Ridiculous..
    It was pretty obvious what you were asking..
    *Scratching my head* Some people just enjoy twisting the words of others
  • Elaine Melicio... 2012/04/16 02:15:13
    Elaine
    This has nothing to do with the question.
  • Melicio... Elaine 2012/04/16 02:29:34
    Melicious Kiss of PHAET
    +7
    What has nothing to do with the question? Arrows fall weird, not sure which comment you are referring to.
  • Panloker 2012/04/15 18:12:01
    YES
    Panloker
    +2
    I don't know why anyone in their right mind would wanna continue having children while living off the system. I know in inner cities there are women with 5, 6 or more children, often different fathers each who continue collecting welfare benefits. It is not right that they play the system and these children will often follow the same path because that is what they are taught. I have heard of people deliberately getting pregnant to collect benefits. Children are not meant to be meal tickets!! What a way to grow up :(

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/09/17 09:40:24

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals