Do you dislike Obama for the color of his skin or the content of his character?
Gracie - Proud Conservative
2012/06/23 03:05:59
|
|
|||||
|
15 votes
|
|
6% | ||
|
257 votes
|
|
94% | ||
I dislike President Obama because of his policies, his agenda, his arrogance and his disregard and dislike of America. It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, PERIOD. He has a serious problem telling the truth but I suppose that comes from being a Progressive, they must lie about their intentions or they'd never get elected. He's thin-skinned and I've never seen a President in my life that hated capitalism and refused to accept responsibility for his own actions. Is this what leadership looks like?
Top Opinion
-
Or the content of his character
+24Actually, he has no character. He is an arrogant, self aggrandinizing little man and would be so no matter what color his skin. Leftists have played the race card to defend him so much that it's in tatters. Null and void.
His diligent efforts to turn the USA into a Socialist Third World Country, is much more to dislike.
Also, ANYONE who votes FOR someone because of his color.... is a RACTIST too!
I really like Allen West, a true American hero and a loyal American.
Why is that so hard for you hillbillies to understand?
http://www.commentarymagazine...
Second - yeah, the Arab World doesnt like us very much because we're at WAR! We kinda slaughtered a lot of civilians. Any President of America wouldn't be popular over there.
http://aai.3cdn.net/5d2b8344e...
Thousands of our beautiful soldiers have also been slaughtered because the Taliban are Pissed Off!!!
Who started this crap. Bush! After 9/11, it should have been going after the ones who caused this movement and intended to cause MORE destruction.
I did click on your link...I always check out links. It's a right winged rag mag site. Geez....assume much?
Perhaps if the Clinton administration had addressed the issue of terrorism, instead of totally ignoring it, we wouldn't have had 9/11, Iraq or Afghanistan.
One day someone is going to have to take responsibility for their own actions, instead of always blaming Bush. At least he went to Congress, they voted for it. He didn't lie about anything, they already had the same info. Democrats are always a bunch of weenies!
As he said in one bullet point:
The killing of bin Laden only worsened attitudes toward the U.S.
So...whoever killed bin Laden (according to Zogby) is going to get lower ratings right?
Now, tell me the logic in you argument. As a whole, the Middle East HATES the US. killing bin Laden (the leader of Al Qaeda) making it worst. You could plug in any name of a President at this time and their ratings will go down.
Remember, there are Generals and the Secretary of Defense making most of these recommendations and calls. Bush had his mind set and bombed Iraq.
Even then, logically, most people were going "Why There??". Go after the Taliban and AlQaeda! Not Sadam!
Where did I say "love" as in regard to his place in the World?
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and othe...
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002