Quantcast

Do you consider people who make $250,000 per year, WEALTHY?

Drue-AFCL 2012/07/11 02:54:19
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mark 2012/12/04 02:24:19
    YES
    Mark
    250,000 before taxes is a lot of money. With all the deductions and corporate loop holes a 250,000 income stays pretty healthy. Any notion that most of the 250,000 is eaten up by taxes and cost of living is wrong the 250,000 a year gross folks have it made. The real question is why are so many people with 25,000 a year incomes wanting the wealthier to have a low tax. Let the wealthy come out and defend themselves or are they cowards who get the misguided underinformed poor to do their bidding. Come on rich lets hear from you. Our sons and daughters helped make you money the country collectively helped so why don't you rich say something maybe you are sneeky and greedy and are to busy at the "club"
  • **StarzAbove** 2012/07/13 00:23:37
    YES
    **StarzAbove**
    Yes
  • MrsJJS 2012/07/12 19:34:15
    NO
    MrsJJS
    +1
    Not necessarily considering the cost of living.... I would describe them as Comfortable. Although I wouldn't mind making $250,000 a year! :-)
  • LibertyCaroline 2012/07/12 17:29:16
    NO
    LibertyCaroline
    +1
    No, based on the economy and taxes, but I suppose to those making a lot less it might seem that way.
  • Myagooshki 2012/07/12 06:07:22 (edited)
    NO
    Myagooshki
    +1
    0-15,000= Lower Class

    15,000-30,000 = Lower Middle Class

    30,000-100,000= Middle Class

    100,000-500,000= Upper Middle Class

    500,000 + = Wealthy



    I've lived in numerous neighborhoods and been around many different people of different affluencies. The people I know who could be making around 250,000 or more than that are not the type of people who always eat at fancy restaurants or live in MANSIONS or have yachts or butlers or any of that. 250,000 is pretty much upper middle class that your respectable lawyer or doctor would take home.
  • Catnip 2012/07/12 05:15:26
    NO
    Catnip
    +1
    Do these people have children? Children cost money, a LOT OF MONEY!!!!
  • fortycal_sig 2012/07/12 04:18:22
    NO
    fortycal_sig
    +1
    Considering the true cost of things, and the level of taxation, that's just barely upper-middle class.
  • Reggie☮ 2012/07/11 22:45:23
    NO
    Reggie☮
  • TheTruth1313 2012/07/11 20:19:05
    YES
    TheTruth1313
    Perhaps not "WEALTHY", but absolutely very well off. Wealthy is kind of a relative term.
    However, if you can't live extremely comfortably on 250k/year, then you are extremely financially irresponsible at the very least.
  • Ron in Oregon 2012/07/11 19:18:25
    NO
    Ron in Oregon
    +1
    Look at it from a percentage viewpoint.
    If you have a little more money you spend more and help the economy.
  • Jackie 2012/07/11 17:49:03
    YES
    Jackie
    That is a million compared to what I make
  • BackWoodsMike 2012/07/11 17:36:44
    NO
    BackWoodsMike
    +1
    For the eight years prier to my retirement in 2004, my annual salary was over $265K not including bonuses.

    That is far from being rich, especially with the amount of taxes I was forced to pay.
  • jere.chievres 2012/07/11 17:17:57
    NO
    jere.chievres
    +3
    Because they usually spend it as fast as the get it.
  • PumpkinMuncher 2012/07/11 17:10:17
    YES
    PumpkinMuncher
    Since I make about 10,000 a year hell yeah thats wealthy to me
  • Rand 2012/07/11 16:29:02
    NO
    Rand
    +4
    All things realative. Those who make $250,000 per year net after taxes are usually there because of education, risk or they own their own business. If we assume after taxes, then we have to assume, they are laying it all out there to make the money. Meaning traveling distances, working hours in the 12 to 18 hours per day or very highly skilled work.
    NO matter your income it does not matter how much you make , but how much you can save.
    Those who make $250,000 usually own their own business and are employing people, unless they are a gov't people, who do not provide a product or a service. Those folks are sucking the life out of America.
  • Farnsworth 2012/07/11 16:13:13
    YES
    Farnsworth
    +1
    anyone who has a dollar more than me is wealthier than me...

    I could live high on the hog if I had that much income
  • Bearish 2012/07/11 14:59:05
    NO
    Bearish
    +1
    That is upper middle class.. It is by no means "Wealthy"
  • Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥ 2012/07/11 14:30:19
    YES
    Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥
    I should. I never made more than a tenth of that in one year.
  • Golden Panther 2012/07/11 14:19:11
    NO
    Golden Panther
    +2
    Back in the day yes, but with all the Federal Reserve money printing inflation and excessive taxation it is just about a living wage. Can you imagine obumbo and his spoiled rotten family being able to get along with those few paltry dollars?
  • merlinskiss 2012/07/11 13:57:13
    NO
    merlinskiss
    But they should be living very well if they have half a brain and they should be saving a lot as well.
  • ♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒ 2012/07/11 13:44:23
    YES
    ♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒
    yesh, and good for them.
  • D D 2012/07/11 13:35:09
    YES
    D D
    My household makes $40k. So yes, $250k is rich.
  • Reichstolz 2012/07/11 13:18:23
    NO
    Reichstolz
    +1
    In most cases making $250,000 as a family is just another stepping stone toward wealth.
  • Mandy 2012/07/11 13:02:34
    YES
    Mandy
    +1
    Considering I make less than 1/4 of that and am getting by just fine, yeah, I think that's doing pretty good.
  • Jean 2012/07/11 12:38:45
    NO
    Jean
    +1
    $250,000 per year is what a construction worker or welder can make in a good year with a lot of overtime. It's also what B2B sales reps make before taxes, insurance and other deducts that are the responsibility of independent contractors. And if the person lives in a high-tax, high cost of living area such as NYC or Los Angeles, $250,000 per year is solidly lower middle class.
  • Freeranger 2012/07/11 12:08:18
    NO
    Freeranger
    +1
    I do not.
  • MlssCue =Go Blue= 2012/07/11 11:18:48
    YES
    MlssCue =Go Blue=
    +1
    Compared to my income that's hell a wealthy!
  • Jean MlssCue... 2012/07/11 12:39:16
    Jean
    You might want to look at your skill set and see where you can improve!
  • MlssCue... Jean 2012/07/11 12:48:19
    MlssCue =Go Blue=
    +1
    Novel idea, why didn't I think of that?!
  • dj 2012/07/11 10:30:29
    YES
    dj
    +2
    Compared to most people I know and myself, it is wealthy. Compared to millionaires it is not.
  • tff~PWCM~JLA 2012/07/11 10:02:24
    NO
    tff~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Most people making that kind of money are family businesses whose personal and business taxes are one and the same.
  • pops 2012/07/11 09:49:03
    NO
    pops
    +1
    Not in this day and age.
  • moby 2012/07/11 09:28:45
    NO
    moby
    +1
    they would be upper middle class.
  • ed 2012/07/11 08:49:39
    NO
    ed
    +1
    they are better off than most but that's it.
  • Fariborz-Zak 2012/07/11 08:07:21
    YES
    Fariborz-Zak
    +1
    somewhat
  • Heptarch 2012/07/11 07:31:46
    YES
    Heptarch
    +1
    Yes. Because they are.
  • hat man 2012/07/11 07:16:56
    NO
    hat man
    +1
    I think it is more than enough to live on. But I only see the billionaires as wealthy; that's when you have real power.
  • Windy 2012/07/11 07:05:59
    NO
    Windy
    +2
    I would call them upper middle class, well off but not truly wealthy.
  • NYCbrit 2012/07/11 06:32:08
    NO
    NYCbrit
    +3
    Upper middle class, as long as they're not in say NYC or much of CT. Then middle at best.
  • Prophet 2012/07/11 06:02:03
    YES
    Prophet
    And So?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 13:59:09

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals