Quantcast

Do you believe that Obama is GENUINELY concerned with strengthening America?

Drue-AFCL 2013/01/22 01:26:30
Related Topics: Obama, America
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Death The Kid 2013/01/31 07:31:40
    Yes
    Death The Kid
    Sore losers are sore.
  • T. James H 2013/01/29 23:26:57
  • Bureauc 0Bamao 2013/01/28 16:11:31
    No
    Bureauc 0Bamao
    +2
    We get the best insight into 0bamas real agenda when he's caught on an open mic.
    "After my election i'lI have more flexibility." (To disarm America)
  • mark 1 2013/01/28 01:36:01
  • ☆ QueenAline 2013/01/27 23:02:36
  • ratclifft~pwcm 2013/01/26 19:23:28
    No
    ratclifft~pwcm
    +2
    NO .he want's us as weak as he is
  • chuck 2013/01/25 17:55:17
    Yes
    chuck
    I have4 change my mind on Obama so much from beliving lies about him to finding how good he really is
  • Tom Trojan 2013/01/24 03:22:49
    No
    Tom Trojan
    +2
    He wants to bring us down to an equal level with other nations........
  • mikeyavelli 2013/01/23 18:21:11
    No
    mikeyavelli
    +2
    obama has a goal. he is to sell his brand of communism with a smile and n illusion of fairness. his laissez-faire poltics abroad, his appointment of kerry and hagel, his disdain for america as the lone superpower, all show that a weak america is an obama america.
  • Charlie 2013/01/23 16:00:03
    No
    Charlie
    +3
    in a true communist society the ruler is more concerned with weakening the state in order to make the poor and ignorant dependent upon the government. people from china and cuba and communist nations all over the world who live here now...all say Obama is doing EXACTLY what these other communist rulers did to their country...wake up America..
  • Sissy 2013/01/23 11:56:25
    Yes
    Sissy
    +2
    What evidence do you have otherwise?
  • Simone Seitz 2013/01/23 02:47:53
    No
    Simone Seitz
    +2
    If you mean he's concerned with his version of America. Then yes.
  • Sissy Simone ... 2013/01/23 11:56:51
    Sissy
    +1
    What "version" might that be?
  • Stinger61 2013/01/23 01:00:02
    No
    Stinger61
    +2
    There are too many examples, where President Obama could have taken steps to affirm our countries resolve, in the face of powers that obviously hate us and want to do us harm. But for whatever reason he chose not to defy or defend, our position, as a country. Why?
  • Sissy Stinger61 2013/01/23 11:57:27
    Sissy
    +1
    When has he not defended our "position"?
  • Stinger61 Sissy 2013/01/23 19:49:54
    Stinger61
    +1
    Defense experts call Obama’s defense strategy “a strategy of hope “he wants America’s allies to do more in combating the problems facing the U.S overseas, the problem is the countries we are having conflict with, hate the US more than anybody, and our allies don’t want to get involved to deep. In the process he wants to reduce our military presence taking a chance that fewer resources will not weaken our military strength. Then of course you have Benghazi, and the Iranian nuclear problem.
  • Sissy Stinger61 2013/01/24 12:12:02
    Sissy
    Considering the fact that our defense budget takes up over 30%, a great deal of it (admittedly by Gates), overspending, I have never heard anything but cutting waste without diminishing our security.

    We know the world is a dangerous place. As Clinton said, there are new emerging governments that are weak in governing because they are so new. It is our responsibility as the toughtest player on the block to protect our interests. It would be helpful if the Dept. got the resources they need to do so.
  • Joe Shwingding BN-ZERO 2013/01/23 00:27:52
    Yes
    Joe Shwingding BN-ZERO
    +1
    weakening America weakens his power base.... NO leader is interested in that.
  • J.L.Worley 2013/01/22 23:49:11
    No
    J.L.Worley
    +3
    I genuinely believe that Odumbass doesn't care for America at all.
  • Sissy J.L.Worley 2013/01/23 11:57:50
    Sissy
    +1
    What has he done/said to make you believe that?
  • J.L.Worley Sissy 2013/01/23 15:04:45
    J.L.Worley
    +1
    He has ruined this country's economy, and is trying to take away our right to bear arms which is very unconstitutional.
  • Sissy J.L.Worley 2013/01/24 12:14:33
    Sissy
    +1
    He is making every effort to revive the economy that had tipped us to the edge of an every greater Depression than the last time. If you can't see or accept that, there isn't anything to discuss.

    He has never said he is going to take away your stupid guns. There are 300,000,000 of them in this country. How soon do you think the Feds are going to be knocking on your door to take yours? If you guys would think rationally for two seconds, you would understand that it isn't guns, its common sense. Hopefully some of you will get some.
  • J.L.Worley Sissy 2013/01/24 15:42:38
    J.L.Worley
    I feel sorry for you are one of his brain washed zombies.
  • Sissy J.L.Worley 2013/01/29 01:07:49
    Sissy
    :)
  • debra.faber 2013/01/22 22:43:51
    Yes
    debra.faber
    +3
    Obama is certainly concerned with strengthening the American economy, education system, safety net, and re-establish America as the land of opportunity for ALL.
  • Drue-AFCL debra.f... 2013/01/22 23:00:24
    Drue-AFCL
    +2
    Sounds good. . . . .I don't buy it!
  • Sissy Drue-AFCL 2013/01/23 11:58:25
    Sissy
    Did you listen to his inaugural address?
  • Drue-AFCL Sissy 2013/01/28 20:59:04
    Drue-AFCL
    Talk is cheap. . . . .actions speak volumes over mere words. You can not strengthen America or anywhere else for that matter when you are pulling 1 Trillion Plus deficits every year and not having a budget in 4 years. Those actions show his insincerity. Another example of Obama saying things that he obviously did not mean. . . . ..




    Listen to what Sen. Barack Obama said in a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate in 2006 as a matter of record:

    “Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America’s debt problem. The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our government’s reckless fiscal policies.
    That is a clip, but I am sure you catch the drift right?
  • Sissy debra.f... 2013/01/23 12:02:41
  • kaZappoo 2013/01/22 22:34:41
    No
    kaZappoo
    +2
    from his prevous term ,, strenghting isnt his intent ,,,clearly the opposite !
  • Sissy kaZappoo 2013/01/23 11:58:37
    Sissy
    How so?
  • Stop Hillary 2016 2013/01/22 22:30:30
    No
    Stop Hillary 2016
    +2
    In 1994, President Clinton earned a pyrrhic victory for the Democrats as he signed into law the so-called Assault Weapons Ban. Shortly thereafter, however, the Democrats lost control of both houses of Congress as Republicans gained eight Senate seats, fifty-four House seats, and ten governorships. America had made their voices heard on how they felt about the radical legislation. Democrats have been trying to play nice ever since- until now.

    For twenty years, the Democrats have been trying to convince Americans that they weren’t coming for their guns. As we near almost twenty years of Democrats posing with their hunting rifles and touting their halfhearted support of the Second Amendment, the Democrats are celebrating their hard-earned headway with the American people by- you guessed it- coming for the peoples’ guns.

    The irony would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.

    What is wrong with these people? I understand that the left has little use for history and the lessons it serves, but these legislators were alive when Democrats were run out of Congress on a rail. In fact, many were serving at the time! Surely they can recall the political fallout from their brazen trampling of our Second Amendment rights; so why try and recapture that catastrophe from which it took twenty year...



















    In 1994, President Clinton earned a pyrrhic victory for the Democrats as he signed into law the so-called Assault Weapons Ban. Shortly thereafter, however, the Democrats lost control of both houses of Congress as Republicans gained eight Senate seats, fifty-four House seats, and ten governorships. America had made their voices heard on how they felt about the radical legislation. Democrats have been trying to play nice ever since- until now.

    For twenty years, the Democrats have been trying to convince Americans that they weren’t coming for their guns. As we near almost twenty years of Democrats posing with their hunting rifles and touting their halfhearted support of the Second Amendment, the Democrats are celebrating their hard-earned headway with the American people by- you guessed it- coming for the peoples’ guns.

    The irony would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.

    What is wrong with these people? I understand that the left has little use for history and the lessons it serves, but these legislators were alive when Democrats were run out of Congress on a rail. In fact, many were serving at the time! Surely they can recall the political fallout from their brazen trampling of our Second Amendment rights; so why try and recapture that catastrophe from which it took twenty years to recover? Is this some sort of political masochism?

    The answer: They think they’re untouchable. In 2004, the best they could scrounge up was John Kerry- a man so exciting that he makes Mitt Romney look like Steven Tyler. Fast forward ten years later, and the powerhouse Democratic Party has spread it’s messaging near and far, to the young and old and to the rich and poor. They have momentum, and they think they can continue to do whatever they want.

    However, their hubris caused them to kick the hornets’ nest. Because while many Americans have developed too lenient of an attitude towards government ineptitude and backwards policies, the quickest way to make them stand up and take notice is by omitting the stench of tyranny when slowing reaching for their guns.

    Since 1994, every Democrat, with very few exceptions, have had to give their obligatory speech announcing their support for gun rights. “Yada, yada, yada I am a believer in hunting rights. I won’t try and repeal the Second Amendment.” It’s been this way for twenty long and frustrating years.

    Even President Obama and ol’ Slow Joe Biden have come out to say that they “support the Second Amendment.” But by saying so, they’re telling us something different. Notice how they never come out and say, “I’m for you having freedom of speech,” or “I’m against quartering soldiers in your home.” No, instead, they have to single out and claim that they’re okay with the right to bear arms- But the mere fact that they have to say that indicates otherwise. If you’re running for the presidency, you should be okay with the Second Amendment!

    In fact, as Americans, we’re not asking your opinion- if you want to be an elected official, you will have to swear an oath saying you will protect and defend the Constitution, not only the parts with which you agree! If you have any reservations about whether you should abide by any of the amendments, then find another line of work- I hear Kinko’s is hiring.

    The Republican Revolution of ’94 is a cautionary tale. The Democrats flew too close to the sun on that one, and paid a steep price. The political fallout was enormous for the Democrats in Congress and Clinton may have been re-elected, but that really said more about Bob Dole than it did about Bill
    Clinton.

    The modern Democratic Party is headed by radicals who have become entirely too cocky. Americans have a long history of fierce independence when it comes to firearms and this new push to disarm the American population may have devastating results for the leftists.

    But if the Democrats insist on revisiting this trauma, that’s fine. Let’s just hope they don’t take our Second Amendment down with them.


    http://tpnn.com/rusty-humphri...
    (more)
  • Joe Shw... Stop Hi... 2013/01/23 00:29:49
    Joe Shwingding BN-ZERO
    +2
    funny ... for someone so "interested" in "history" you forget the 12 years of Reganomics and the rejection of those policies which ended in disaster.
  • Stop Hi... Joe Shw... 2013/01/23 20:37:45
    Stop Hillary 2016
    Then go to the site and call them a liar
  • Joe Shw... Stop Hi... 2013/01/23 20:57:13
    Joe Shwingding BN-ZERO
    +1
    No ned. You brought their garbage here ... a party which ... got their clocks cleaned in the last election. I'd say a full rejection by the greater populace of a group which was taken over by corporate interests.
  • childofHis 2013/01/22 22:24:25
    No
    childofHis
    +2
    No, not in any way. I think he's hell bent on destroying America.
  • Sissy childofHis 2013/01/23 11:59:51
    Sissy
    +1
    What exactly is he doing to "destroy America" that the fringe who make up the minority of the majority in the House haven't done themselves for the last two years?
  • childofHis Sissy 2013/01/25 05:21:46
    childofHis
    He's lied about the economy, trying to take away guns, downsizing the military, giving planes to Egypt....need I go on? If you can't see it, you're either a fool or still in high school.
  • Sissy childofHis 2013/01/29 01:12:17
    Sissy
    You can't see so well yourself cupcake. Never said he was coming to get your guns. That would be a full-time job seeing there are 300,000,000 of them in this country. It would be so helpful if the republicans would have rolled up their sleeves and helped fix the problem they mostly made with the economy, and I'm not in high school, I retired from teaching in it.
  • childofHis Sissy 2013/02/03 02:23:46
    childofHis
    Probably from LAUSD by the way you think. I really think you are missing the point, but keep blaming the Repubs if it makes you happy.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/01 08:11:35

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals