Do You Believe Marriage Should Be Solely Between a Man and a Woman?

I have no problem with that what so ever. BUT, that is still ignoring the elephant in the room. What about pay, benefits, taxes, pensions? To extend breaks to more by a judges fiat? This gives more to more while while letting more pay less.
We already have a system that is disfunctional and unfair, a couple without children subsidizes those who do have kids. The more kids you have the less you pay even though you are the ones driving up demands for government services. In Alaska a state worker retires with state paid health insurance, OK. They die the spouse continues coverage, fine. If the spouse goes to work they can opt out of the employers insurance and pocket the money their coworkers are paying as their share. If they remarry their new spouse is covered under the original workers state insurance. Now both can opt out of the employer offered insurance and pocket the the money. I don't like that system and do not want to see it expanded further.
Gays in the military, no problem, they were there in the seventies when I was in. If you are married you get more money than singles and are free to live where you choose with a tax free housing allowance. Singles are required to live in barracks. Two guys get "married", now they have more rights than the single trooper and two housing allowances, thousands a month tax free.
The partners get a lot of benefits without the society getting anything of value in return. Traditional marriage gave society the benefit of the child bearer being freed to raise the children and have some measure of security. The breakdown of traditional marriage has taken much of the societal benefit away. If you want to remove some of the benefits from traditional couples, no problem there.