Quantcast

Do people with disabilities face staggeringly low employment rates and discrimination in hiring practices?

poet4justice 2012/09/14 02:19:22
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Newspaper Slams Disability Hiring Effort
By

August 27, 2012Text Size A A

A Washington, D.C. newspaper is facing rebuke after an editorial written by its own staff criticized federal efforts to hire more people with disabilities.

The opinion piece from The Washington Times editorial board focused on a recent U.S. Department of Justice memo informing employees about the agency’s plan to hire more people with so-called targeted disabilities including cerebral palsy, deafness, blindness and severe intellectual disability.

“Most employers would balk at even minor mental disabilities in hiring a lawyer, let alone severe ones. But the policy states that the Cabinet department run by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. must ‘achieve a work force from all segments of society,’ which includes those who are teetering on the edge of sanity,” The Washington Times said in its Aug. 22 editorial.

The commentary is drawing strong backlash from disability advocates who say the criticisms are baseless and rely on untrue information.

“While the Times editorial suggests applicants with disabilities would be fast-tracked into jobs at the DOJ without due screening and assessment, the DOJ memo clearly states otherwise,” said Jonathan Young, chair of the National Council on Disability. “To mischaracterize the DOJ initiative with fear-mongering and hyperbole misses the point.”

Under a 2010 executive order signed by President Barack Obama, all federal agencies are supposed to dramatically increase hiring of people with disabilities. The presidential initiative calls for an additional 100,000 employees with disabilities in five years.

“The fact is that since the 1970s, the law requires federal agencies to be model employers and hire qualified people with disabilities. This practice has had bipartisan support ever since President Nixon signed it into law,” said Julie Ward of The Arc. “It is still needed today as people with disabilities face staggeringly low employment rates and discrimination in hiring practices.”

A recent Government Accountability Office report found that federal agencies have a long way to go toward meeting Obama’s goal, with just 20,000 new hires added under the policy in 2010 and 2011.

The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment on the newspaper editorial and the agency’s hiring practices.

Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Alexander T Steward 2012/09/15 18:10:20
    yes, because
    Alexander T Steward
    Yes we do because not all disabilities are well-known or even recognised as such.
  • SA 2012/09/14 15:19:58 (edited)
    yes, because
    SA
    +1
    Many people who hire see a disabled person as one who is too risky to hire. I am over 50 and have Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy and now Arthritis.

    I worked WITH a handicap for almost 9 years at the SAME PLACE until I was assaulted by a client and went on Workman's Comp to recover.

    To make a very long story short, I decided to quit that job, because I was afraid of being assaulted again. I was a Client Service Caseworker in a shelter/rehab center.

    I arrived early to work, left late, trained interns, volunteers, those new to my department, the residents in the alcohol drug program, took only 2 vacations, rarely took sick leave, volunteered to help out on my own time without pay to serve our clients during Christmas.

    After I left the job, I looked for a job for one year, without success. My degree in Human Services didn't help because I was told I was either over qualified or needed a Masters Degree.

    I went to many non profits, as well as getting desperate enough to fill out an application with Social Services as a technician, not a client.

    I would love to work, if given a chance. I am now receiving disability, which is about a third of what I made while working. I've done a lot of changing to merely survive.

    NOBODY IN THE POSITION OF HIRING WILL ADMIT THIS, BUT MY DISABILITY HAS BEEN A HUGE FACTOR REGARDING MY WORK STATUS.

    I worked twice as hard many times, to be considered just as good as others.
  • Mike 2012/09/14 14:25:18
    yes, because
    Mike
    +2
    most employers consider them a hassle and the govt offers very little in incentives to hire one
  • Angela Chambers 2012/09/14 10:33:23
    yes, because
    Angela Chambers
    +2
    They are disabled. Plain and simple. People will descriminate against anything different. That's just the way it is. That's the way it's always been, and that's the way it always will be.
  • SA Angela ... 2012/09/14 16:01:11
    SA
    +1
    I agree......unfortunately.
    i am a disabled person who has experienced this.
  • Daniel 2012/09/14 03:04:10 (edited)
    yes, because
    Daniel
    I can only assume yes. It's an employers market right now. I've hired the best and pay them well. I've built a company like the Green Bay. Everyone wants in and only a few make the cut. I could hire more but will wait till after November. If Romney wins I'll hire 10 - 20 men. If Obama wins I'll down size.I'm not the only one and here lies the problem with unemployment.
  • poet4ju... Daniel 2012/09/14 03:30:08
    poet4justice
    How many people with disabilities have you hire that fit your qualification?
  • Daniel poet4ju... 2012/09/14 10:51:20
    Daniel
    Non. That's the point. We're in a depression and I'm not going to turn away a better qualified man to hire a guy who can only do half the work. Now in a thriving economy companies can afford to hire bodies.
  • poet4ju... Daniel 2012/09/15 00:48:24
    poet4justice
    So you hire more base on the idea that if your party win and you will fire when your party don't win. hhhmm, this is not a company that hire people base on qualification and I can't tell you no that qualify people with disabilities will work for a company that hire on base pity?
  • Daniel poet4ju... 2012/09/15 02:44:03
    Daniel
    I don't think you understood. I hire people win the company can afford them I lay them off when we can't. I do not like to fire or lay people off. I could hire 10 more men today but don't want to have to lay them off in January. Instead I keep the guys I have working and they love the overtime. Obama and Liberals have screwed our economy. Obama's Health Care will put a tax on me that will force me to down size. My men make $30,000 - $40,000 a year. I bid my jobs to cover my over head. I make $50 + thousand a year. I don't make much more then my men and I'm the guy putting 12-16 hrs a day in. Now it's cheaper for me to pay the 700.00 a year in fines per employee then pay the insurance. This will give me the same wage as my men and all the stress. I'm not a greedy Conservative just hard working and fair. I have perks or I wouldn't do it yes. I drive a company truck home but then so does a couple of my men. Company pays my cell bill so I save money there. If it doesn't pay to own a business I'll go work for someone else. Yes the way my company runs will be determined by this election.
  • marty 2012/09/14 02:50:14
    yes, because
    marty
    +1
    People don't think a disabled person can do a job. Certain jobs really aren't fit for certain disabilities, but excluding before an interview is just wrong.
  • Rust 2012/09/14 02:36:09 (edited)
  • Tee Quake 2012/09/14 02:22:54
    no, because
    Tee Quake
    People with disabilities are benefiting from years of campaigns encouraging employers to hire the handicapped. Frankly, I have found most handicapped employees I have been fortunate enough to work with are excellent workers and appreciate the fact that they have a JOB. God Bless them.
  • poet4ju... Tee Quake 2012/09/14 02:27:17
    poet4justice
    did you mean to say "Yes"?
  • poet4justice 2012/09/14 02:21:28
    yes, because
    poet4justice
    +1
    and we need more in the private sector and nonprofit
  • Zervur 2012/09/14 02:20:53
    no, because
    Zervur
    people should be able to hire who they want.
  • poet4ju... Zervur 2012/09/14 02:32:08
    poet4justice
    +1
    I agree with your statement but if you don't try to hire a person with disabilities then people should not be complaining about people with disabilities on welfare
  • Zervur poet4ju... 2012/09/14 02:33:11
    Zervur
    If they are competitive, why are they on welfare?
  • poet4ju... Zervur 2012/09/14 02:35:48
    poet4justice
    well let put it this way. have you hire or interview a person with disabilities?
  • Zervur poet4ju... 2012/09/14 02:36:34
    Zervur
    I don't make hiring decisions.
  • poet4ju... Zervur 2012/09/14 02:40:14 (edited)
    poet4justice
    have you interview them?
  • Zervur poet4ju... 2012/09/14 02:41:03
    Zervur
    I dont interview.
  • poet4ju... Zervur 2012/09/14 02:48:05
    poet4justice
    So how do you know about their competitive levels or skills when you are not involved in the process of hiring?
  • Zervur poet4ju... 2012/09/14 02:48:49
    Zervur
    If someone is competitive, they will get hired.
  • SA Zervur 2012/09/14 16:13:34
    SA
    I am disabled NOT on welfare, but on disability because I have worked previously. Most disabled people don't want to be treated special, just given a chance to prove ourselves just as good.

    You are right. People should hire who they want. I worked at the same place for almost 9 years and NEVER once received a write up, bad yearly performance, or complaints.

    When our department was looking for a replacement for my supervisopr I was in charge. I was very capable, but unfortunately over or under qualified for other places.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 23:46:48

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals